Statistically Adrift: Why A Central Conclusion in Academically Adrift is Faulty

Date
2012
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Description
Abstract

One of the most cited findings reported in the book Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses by Arum and Roska is that 45 percent of the students did not show a statistically significant gain in critical thinking. In this paper we show that the significance tests were conducted incorrectly and that it would be very unlikely for any single student to show a statistically significant gain.

Description
Advisor
Degree
Type
Report
Keywords
Citation

Lane, David and Oswald, Fred. "Statistically Adrift: Why A Central Conclusion in Academically Adrift is Faulty." (2012) https://hdl.handle.net/1911/79040.


Lane, David and Oswald, Fred. "Statistically Adrift: Why A Central Conclusion in Academically Adrift is Faulty." (2012) https://hdl.handle.net/1911/79040.

Has part(s)
Forms part of
Published Version
Rights
Link to license
Citable link to this page