Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/30706
Title: Fear of the Dark? The CJEU adds electricity shortage to the reasons justifying an ex post regularization of projects without an EIA: Case C-411/17 Inter-Environnement Wallonie and Bond Beter Leefmilieu Vlaanderen, EU:C:2019:622
Authors: ILIOPOULOS, Theodoros 
BIJNENS, Daan 
Issue Date: 2020
Publisher: 
Source: Maastricht journal of European and comparative law, 27 (1) , p. 120 -129
Abstract: In July 2019, the CJEU delivered its judgment on the case C-411/17 Inter-Environnement Wallonie and Bond Beter Leefmilieu Vlaanderen. The case relates to the protracted debate on the production and use of nuclear energy in Belgium, which at present culminated with the legislative extension of the operation of two nuclear power stations. The CJEU ruled that the extension should have only been granted after an assessment on the stations’ impact on the environment had been carried out and, thus, the national measures were in breach of EU law. However, it is here argued that the judgment does not settle the dispute: it only initiates its second phase. Accordingly, this contribution focuses on the judgment’s expected implications for EU law and for the national constitutional order.
Keywords: Constitutional law;Directive 2011/92;EIA;energy law;European Law
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/30706
DOI: 10.1177/1023263X19898645
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validations: vabb 2022
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
After peer review Maastricht Journal Submission CaseNote_C-411-17.pdf
  Restricted Access
Peer-reviewed author version104.64 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record

Page view(s)

90
checked on Jun 9, 2022

Download(s)

28
checked on Jun 9, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.