Disrupting Scholarship
Skip other details (including permanent urls, DOI, citation information)
: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Please contact mpub-help@umich.edu to use this work in a way not covered by the license.
For more information, read Michigan Publishing's access and usage policy.
Abstract
Although the video-essay here implicitly argues against the print-literacy form of an abstract, and that the forms of scholarship available here explicitly demonstrate and argue that we cannot simply translate this type of multimodal scholarship into a textual abstracted message outside of the media forms, this abstract gives access to search engine bots. In that sense, this is primarily an abstract for machine reading search engine bots and not merely for human readers.
Key Phrases: Multimodal Scholarship, Open Access, Visceral Scholarship Online, Folk Vine, Digital Humanities, On Revolution, Lynn Tomlinson, Roving Eye Press, Punctum Books, Intimate Bureaucracies, Bob Brown, readies, rovingeyepress.com, Robert Carlton Brown, folkvine.org, redefining, multiple audiences for one message, Beuys, McLuhan, Ulmer, Saper.
