User menu

Accès à distance ? S'identifier sur le proxy UCLouvain

2005 PRETEXT: a revised staging system for primary malignant liver tumours of childhood developed by the SIOPEL group

Primary tabs

download
  • Open access
  • PDF
  • 551.68 K
Roebuck, Derek J. Aronson, Daniel Clapuyt, Philippe [UCL] Czauderna, Piotr de Ville de Goyet, Jean [UCL] Otte, Jean-Bernard [UCL] Perilongo, Giorgio

Over the last 15 years, various oncology groups throughout the world have used the PRETEXT system for staging malignant primary liver tumours of childhood. This paper, written by members of the radiology and surgery committees of the International Childhood Liver Tumor Strategy Group (SIOPEL), presents various clarifications and revisions to the original PRETEXT system.

Document type Article de périodique (Journal article) – Article de recherche
Access type Accès libre
Publication date 2007
Language Anglais
Journal information "Pediatric Radiology : roentgenology, nuclear medicine, ultrasonics, CT, MRI" - Vol. 37, no. 2, p. 123-132 (2007)
Peer reviewed yes
Publisher Springer (Heidelberg)
issn 0301-0449
e-issn 1432-1998
Publication status Publié
Affiliations UCL - MD/RAIM - Département de radiologie et d'imagerie médicale
UCL - (SLuc) Service de radiologie
UCL - (SLuc) Centre de malformations vasculaires congénitales
UCL - (SLuc) Centre du cancer
UCL - MD/CHIR - Département de chirurgie
UCL - (SLuc) Service de chirurgie et transplantation abdominale
MESH Subject Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Pediatrics - standards ; Neoplasm Staging - standards ; Liver Neoplasms - classification - pathology ; Internationality ; Humans ; Child
Keywords Liver ; Tumour ; Hepatoblastoma ; Staging ; Children
Links
  1. MacKinlay GA, Pritchard J (1992) A common language for childhood liver tumours. Pediatr Surg Int 7:325–326
  2. Pritchard J, Brown J, Shafford E et al (2000) Cisplatin, doxorubicin, and delayed surgery for childhood hepatoblastoma: a successful approach – results of the first prospective study of the International Society of Pediatric Oncology. J Clin Oncol 18:3819–3828
  3. Aronson DC, Schnater JM, Staalman CR et al (2005) Predictive value of the pretreatment extent of disease system in hepatoblastoma: results from the International Society of Pediatric Oncology Liver Tumor Study Group SIOPEL-1 study. J Clin Oncol 23:1245–1252
  4. Brown J, Perilongo G, Shafford E et al (2000) Pretreatment prognostic factors for children with hepatoblastoma – results from the International Society of Paediatric Oncology (SIOP) study SIOPEL 1. Eur J Cancer 36:1418–1425
  5. Perilongo G, Shafford E, Maibach R et al (2004) Risk-adapted treatment for childhood hepatoblastoma. final report of the second study of the International Society of Paediatric Oncology-SIOPEL 2. Eur J Cancer 40:411–421
  6. Roebuck DJ, Olsen Ø, Pariente D (2006) Radiological staging in children with hepatoblastoma. Pediatr Radiol 36:176–182
  7. Couinaud C (1994) The paracaval segments of the liver. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2:145–151
  8. ISHIBASHI Yuuji, SATO Toshio J., HIRAI Ichiro, MURAKAMI Gen, HATA Fumitake, HIRATA Koichi, Ramification Pattern and Topographical Relationship Between the Portal and Hepatic Veins in the Left Anatomical Lobe of the Human Liver, 10.2535/ofaj1936.78.2-3_75
  9. Murakami G, Hata F (2002) Human liver caudate lobe and liver segment. Anat Sci Int 77:211–224
  10. Onishi H, Kawarada Y, Das BC et al (2000) Surgical anatomy of the medial segment (S4) of the liver with special reference to bile ducts and vessels. Hepatogastroenterology 47:143–150
  11. Fasel J H, Selle D, Evertsz C J, Terrier F, Peitgen H O, Gailloud P, Segmental anatomy of the liver: poor correlation with CT., 10.1148/radiology.206.1.9423665
  12. Fischer L, Cardenas C, Thorn M et al (2002) Limits of Couinaud’s liver segment classification: a quantitative computer-based three-dimensional analysis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 26:962–967
  13. Sales JP, Hannoun L, Sichez JP et al (1984) Surgical anatomy of liver segment IV. Anat Clin 6:295–304
  14. Goldsmith NA, Woodburne RT (1957) The surgical anatomy pertaining to liver resection. Surg Gynecol Obstet 105:310–318
  15. Ohno Y, Furui J, Kanematsu T (2004) Is a modified central bisegmentectomy a volume-saving operation for pediatric hepatoblastoma? J Pediatr Surg 39:E13–E16
  16. Von Schweinitz D, Hecker H, Schmidt-von-Arndt G et al (1997) Prognostic factors and staging systems in childhood hepatoblastoma. Int J Cancer 74:593–599
  17. Ishak KG, Glunz PR (1967) Hepatoblastoma and hepatocarcinoma in infancy and childhood. Report of 47 cases. Cancer 20:396–422
  18. Iida T, Suenaga M, Takeuchi Y et al (2004) Successful resection of a ruptured hepatoblastoma prior to chemotherapy: report of a case. Surg Today 34:710–714
  19. Archer D, Babyn P, Gilday D et al (1993) Potentially misleading bone scan findings in patients with hepatoblastoma. Clin Nucl Med 18:1026–1031
  20. Exelby PR, Filler RM, Grosfeld JL (1975) Liver tumors in children in the particular reference to hepatoblastoma and hepatocellular carcinoma: American Academy of Pediatrics Surgical Section Survey – 1974. J Pediatr Surg 10:329–337
  21. von Schweinitz D, Wischmeyer P, Leuschner I et al (1994) Clinico-pathological criteria with prognostic relevance in hepatoblastoma. Eur J Cancer 30A:1052–1058
  22. Sato M, Ishida H, Konno K et al (2000) Liver tumors in children and young patients: sonographic and color Doppler findings. Abdom Imaging 25:596–601
  23. Ohtsuka Y, Takahashi H, Ohnuma N et al (1997) Detection of tumor thrombus in children using color Doppler ultrasonography. J Pediatr Surg 32:1507–1510
Bibliographic reference Roebuck, Derek J. ; Aronson, Daniel ; Clapuyt, Philippe ; Czauderna, Piotr ; de Ville de Goyet, Jean ; et. al. 2005 PRETEXT: a revised staging system for primary malignant liver tumours of childhood developed by the SIOPEL group. In: Pediatric Radiology : roentgenology, nuclear medicine, ultrasonics, CT, MRI, Vol. 37, no. 2, p. 123-132 (2007)
Permanent URL http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/37841