User menu

Accès à distance ? S'identifier sur le proxy UCLouvain

Reflections on the internal auditing as a profession: what might have gone wrong?

Primary tabs

Lenz, Rainer [UCL] Sarens, Gerrit [UCL]

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate and discuss potential reasons why the internal auditing (IA) profession has been marginalized in the governance debate on solutions after the financial crisis that started in 2007, also noting recent studies questioning the value of IA's work. The key aim of this paper is to make readers aware of ambiguities concerning the ultimate customer of IA and its core business, and to stimulate critical reflection thereon. Design/methodology/approach – The conceptual discussion of this paper is based on an objective review of relevant literature, both practitioner and academic. Findings – Positioning IA as agent to the board/audit committee and, at the same time, as partner to management is challenging in practice. The IA function should clarify the customer dimension in its organizational context. Furthermore, this paper argues for a consolidation of internal audit around its core function of providing assurance when seeking to establish IA as a profession. Practical implications – Practitioners will benefit as this paper demands fundamental questions to be addressed in the organizational context, about the ultimate customer and the core business of the IA service rendered. The Institute of Internal Auditors will benefit from this paper and subsequent discussions in academia and practice, supporting its pursuit to gain universal recognition for IA as a profession. Originality/value – This paper may open a new research area in IA that addresses a more critical way of evaluating IA practices.

Document type Article de périodique (Journal article) – Article de recherche
Access type Accès restreint
Publication date 2012
Language Anglais
Journal information "Managerial Auditing Journal" - Vol. 27, no. 6, p. 532-549 (2012)
Peer reviewed yes
Publisher Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. ((United Kingdom) Bingley)
issn 0268-6902
e-issn 1758-7735
Publication status Publié
Affiliation UCL - SSH/LouRIM - Louvain Research Institute in Management and Organizations
Links
  1. Abbott Lawrence J., Parker Susan, Peters Gary F., Serving Two Masters: The Association between Audit Committee Internal Audit Oversight and Internal Audit Activities, 10.2308/acch.2010.24.1.1
  2. Anderson, R. (2009), Corporate Risk Management, Report Commissioned by OECD, Paris.
  3. Baker, N. (2010), “Board games”, Internal Auditing, February, pp. 18‐23.
  4. Baker, N. (2003), “The value agenda”, Internal Auditing & Business Risk, pp. 10‐14.
  5. Beasley Mark S., Carcello Joseph V., Hermanson Dana R., Neal Terry L., The Audit Committee Oversight Process, 10.1506/car.26.1.3
  6. Burns, D.C., Greenspan, J.W. and Hartwell, C. (1994), “The state of professionalism in internal auditing”, The Accounting Historians Journal, Vol. 21 No. 2, December.
  7. Carcello Joseph V., Hermanson Dana R., Raghunandan K., Factors Associated with U.S. Public Companies' Investment in Internal Auditing, 10.2308/acch.2005.19.2.69
  8. Chambers, A. (2010), “Introducing the revised internal auditing standards”, ACCA UK's E‐Bulletin for Internal Audit Professionals, No. 13, 13 December.
  9. Chambers Andrew, The board's black hole – filling their assurance vacuum: can internal audit rise to the challenge?, 10.1108/13683040810864387
  10. Cohen Aaron, Sayag Gabriel, The Effectiveness of Internal Auditing: An Empirical Examination of its Determinants in Israeli Organisations : A. Cohen & G. Sayag, 10.1111/j.1835-2561.2010.00092.x
  11. Elliott Michael, Dawson Ray, Edwards Janet, An improved process model for internal auditing, 10.1108/02686900710759370
  12. Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission (2011), The Financial Crisis Inquiry Report, Final Report of the National Commission on the Causes of the Financial and Economic Crisis in the USA.
  13. Flesher Dale L., Zanzig Jeffrey S., Management accountants express a desire for change in the functioning of internal auditing, 10.1108/02686900010344601
  14. Garnett, A. (2010), “Founding principles”, Internal Auditing, March, pp. 18‐21.
  15. Goodwin Jenny, The Relationship Between the Audit Committee and the Internal Audit Function: Evidence from Australia and New Zealand, 10.1046/j.1099-1123.2003.00074.x
  16. Halimah, N.A., Othman, R., Othman, R. and Kamaruzaman, J. (2009), “The effectiveness of internal audit in Malaysian public sector”, Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, Vol. 5 No. 9, pp. 53‐62.
  17. Hölscher, L. and Rosenthal, J. (2009), “Leistungsmessung der Internen Revision”, Zeitschrift Interne Revision, pp. 9‐14, 1/09.
  18. Jensen Michael, Value Maximisation, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function, 10.1111/1468-036x.00158
  19. Leblanc Richard, The Walker Review proposes ‘The Toughest Governance Regime in the World’, 10.1057/jdg.2009.25
  20. Marks, N. (2010), “Filling the void”, Internal Auditor, December, pp. 29‐30.
  21. Meggeneder, G. (2010), “Shape the future”, Internal Auditor, August, pp. 58‐63.
  22. Getie Mihret Dessalegn, Wondim Yismaw Aderajew, Internal audit effectiveness: an Ethiopian public sector case study, 10.1108/02686900710750757
  23. OECD (2009), “The corporate governance lessons from the financial crisis”, Financial Market Trends, Vol. 2009/1.
  24. Paterson, J. (2011), “Mapping assurance”, Internal Auditing, April, pp. 14‐17.
  25. Piper, A. (2011), “Audit in the limelight”, Internal Auditing, March, pp. 12‐18.
  26. Sarens Gerrit, De Beelde Ignace, Internal auditors' perception about their role in risk management : A comparison between US and Belgian companies, 10.1108/02686900610634766
  27. Sarens Gerrit, De Beelde Ignace, The Relationship between Internal Audit and Senior Management: A Qualitative Analysis of Expectations and Perceptions, 10.1111/j.1099-1123.2006.00351.x
  28. Scarbrough, D.P., Rama, D.V. and Raghunandan, K. (1998), “Audit committee composition and interaction with internal auditing: Canadian evidence”, Accounting Horizons, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 51‐62.
  29. Spira Laura F., Page Michael, Risk management: The reinvention of internal control and the changing role of internal audit, 10.1108/09513570310492335
  30. Valukas, A.R. (2010), Lehmann Brothers – Examiner Report, Vol. 1.
  31. Van Peursem K.A., Conversations with internal auditors : The power of ambiguity, 10.1108/02686900510598849
  32. Chambers, A. (2009), “The black hole of assurance”, Internal Auditor, April, pp. 28‐9.
  33. Devey, C. (2009), “Hands‐on strategy”, Internal Auditing, November, pp. 34‐7.
Bibliographic reference Lenz, Rainer ; Sarens, Gerrit. Reflections on the internal auditing as a profession: what might have gone wrong?. In: Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 27, no. 6, p. 532-549 (2012)
Permanent URL http://hdl.handle.net/2078/118190