User menu

Accès à distance ? S'identifier sur le proxy UCLouvain

Feedback perceptions and attribution by secretarial employees: Effects of feedback-content and sender characteristics

Primary tabs

Raemdonck, Isabel [UCL]
Document type Communication à un colloque (Conference Paper) – Présentation orale avec comité de sélection
Publication date 2012
Language Anglais
Conference "WERA-AARE-APERA", Sydney - Australia (du 02/12/2012 au 06/03/2013)
Journal information "European Journal of Training and Development" - Vol. 37, no.1, p. 24-48 (2013)
Peer reviewed yes
issn 2046-9012
Publication status Publié
Links
  1. Armstrong-Stassen Marjorie, Organisational practices and the post-retirement employment experience of older workers : Organisational practices and post-retirement older workers, 10.1111/j.1748-8583.2007.00057.x
  2. Bauer Johannes, Mulder Regina H., Upward feedback and its contribution to employees' feeling of self‐determination, 10.1108/13665620610693051
  3. Birnbaum Michael H., Stegner Steven E., Source credibility in social judgment: Bias, expertise, and the judge's point of view., 10.1037/0022-3514.37.1.48
  4. Brett Joan F., Atwater Leanne E., 360° feedback: Accuracy, reactions, and perceptions of usefulness., 10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.930
  5. C.K. Chiu Warren, Chan Andy W., Snape Ed, Redman Tom, Age Stereotypes and Discriminatory Attitudes towards Older Workers: An East-West Comparison, 10.1177/0018726701545004
  6. CUSELLA LOUIS P., THE EFFECTS OF SOURCE EXPERTISE AND FEEDBACK VALENCE ON INTRINSIC MOTIVATION, 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1982.tb00680.x
  7. Davis Walter D., The Interactive Effects of Goal Orientation and Feedback Specificity on Task Performance, 10.1207/s15327043hup1804_7
  8. Fedor Donald B., Davis Walter D., Maslyn John M., Mathieson Kieran, Performance improvement efforts in response to negative feedback: the roles of source power and recipient self-esteem, 10.1177/014920630102700105
  9. Feys M., Anseel F., Wille B., Improving Feedback Reports: The Role of Procedural Information and Information Specificity, 10.5465/amle.2010.0054
  10. Feys Marjolein, Libbrecht Nele, Anseel Frederik, Lievens Filip, A Closer Look at the Relationship between Justice Perceptions and Feedback Reactions: The role of the quality of the relationship with the supervisor, 10.5334/pb-48-2-3-127
  11. Giffin Kim, The contribution of studies of source credibility to a theory of interpersonal trust in the communication process., 10.1037/h0024833
  12. Goodman Jodi S., Wood Robert E., Feedback Specificity, Learning Opportunities, and Learning., 10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.809
  13. Goodman Jodi S., Wood Robert E., Hendrickx Margaretha, Feedback Specificity, Exploration, and Learning., 10.1037/0021-9010.89.2.248
  14. Greller Martin M., Herold David M., Sources of feedback: A preliminary investigation, 10.1016/0030-5073(75)90048-3
  15. Halperin Keith, Snyder C. R., Shenkel Randee J., Houston B. Kent, Effects of source status and message favorability on acceptance of personality feedback., 10.1037/0021-9010.61.1.85
  16. Hattie J., Timperley H., The Power of Feedback, 10.3102/003465430298487
  17. Ilgen Daniel R., Fisher Cynthia D., Taylor M. Susan, Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations., 10.1037/0021-9010.64.4.349
  18. Klein Stuart M., Kraut Allen I., Wolfson Alan, Employee Reactions to Attitude Survey Feedback: A Study of the Impact of Structure and Process, 10.2307/2391769
  19. Kluger Avraham N., DeNisi Angelo, The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory., 10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254
  20. Leung Kwok, Su Steven, Morris Michael W., When is Criticism Not Constructive? The Roles of Fairness Perceptions and Dispositional Attributions in Employee Acceptance of Critical Supervisory Feedback, 10.1177/0018726701549002
  21. Musil Carol M., Warner Camille B., Yobas Piyanee Klainin, Jones Susan L., A Comparison of Imputation Techniques for Handling Missing Data, 10.1177/019394502762477004
  22. Robinson Michael D., Clore Gerald L., Simulation, Scenarios, and Emotional Appraisal: Testing the Convergence of Real and Imagined Reactions to Emotional Stimuli, 10.1177/01461672012711012
  23. Shute V. J., Focus on Formative Feedback, 10.3102/0034654307313795
  24. Simon Jessica R., Howard James H., Howard Darlene V., Adult age differences in learning from positive and negative probabilistic feedback., 10.1037/a0018652
  25. Soederberg Miller Lisa M., West Robin L., The Effects of Age, Control Beliefs, and Feedback on Self-Regulation of Reading and Problem Solving, 10.1080/03610730903418380
  26. Strijbos Jan-Willem, Narciss Susanne, Dünnebier Katrin, Peer feedback content and sender's competence level in academic writing revision tasks: Are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency?, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.008
  27. Strijbos, J.W. , Pat-El, R.J. and Narciss, S. (2010), “Validation of a (peer) feedback perceptions questionnaire”, in Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L. , Hodgson, V. , Jones, C. , de Laat, M. , McConnell, D. and Ryberg, T. (Eds), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Networked Learning, Aalborg University, Aalborg , pp. 378-86.
  28. West Robin L., Welch Duana C., Thorn Roxanne M., Effects of goal-setting and feedback on memory performance and beliefs among older and younger adults., 10.1037/0882-7974.16.2.240
Bibliographic reference Raemdonck, Isabel. Feedback perceptions and attribution by secretarial employees: Effects of feedback-content and sender characteristics.WERA-AARE-APERA (Sydney - Australia, du 02/12/2012 au 06/03/2013). In: European Journal of Training and Development, Vol. 37, no.1, p. 24-48 (2013)
Permanent URL http://hdl.handle.net/2078/125801