User menu

Accès à distance ? S'identifier sur le proxy UCLouvain

Differential use of learning strategies in first-year higher education: The impact of personality, academic motivation, and teaching strategies

Primary tabs

Donche, Vincent [UA] De Maeyer, Sven [UA] Coertjens, Liesje [UCL] Van Daal, Tine [UA] Van Petegem, Peter [UA]

BACKGROUND: Although the evidence in support of the variability of students' learning strategies has expanded in recent years, less is known about the explanatory base of these individual differences in terms of the joint influences of personal and contextual characteristics. AIMS: Previous studies have often investigated how student learning is associated with either personal or contextual factors. This study takes an integrative research perspective into account and examines the joint effects of personality, academic motivation, and teaching strategies on students' learning strategies in a same educational context in first-year higher education. SAMPLE: In this study, 1,126 undergraduate students and 90 lecturers from eight professional bachelor programmes in a university college participated. METHODS: Self-report measures were used to measure students' personality, academic motivation, and learning strategies. Students' processing and regulation strategies are mapped using the Inventory of Learning Styles. Key characteristics of more content-focused versus learning-focused teaching strategies were measured. Multivariate multi-level analysis was used to take the nested data structure and interrelatedness of learning strategies into account. RESULTS: Different personality traits (openness, conscientiousness, and neuroticism) and academic motivation (amotivation, autonomous, and controlled motivation) were found to be independently associated with student learning strategies. Besides these student characteristics, also teaching strategies were found to be directly associated with learning strategies. CONCLUSIONS: The study makes clear that the impact of teaching strategies on learning strategies in first-year higher education cannot be overlooked nor overinterpreted, due to the importance of students' personality and academic motivation which also partly explain why students learn the way they do.

Document type Article de périodique (Journal article) – Article de recherche
Access type Accès restreint
Publication date 2013
Language Anglais
Journal information "British Journal of Educational Psychology" - Vol. 83, no.2, p. 238-251 (2013)
Peer reviewed yes
Publisher The British Psychological Society
issn 0007-0998
e-issn 2044-8279
Publication status Publié
Affiliation UA
Links
  1. Baeten Marlies, Kyndt Eva, Struyven Katrien, Dochy Filip, Using student-centred learning environments to stimulate deep approaches to learning: Factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness, 10.1016/j.edurev.2010.06.001
  2. Biggs John, What do inventories of students' learning processes really measure? A theoretical review and clarification, 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1993.tb01038.x
  3. Boyle Elizabeth A., Duffy Tim, Dunleavy Karen, Learning styles and academic outcome: The validity and utility of Vermunt's Inventory of Learning Styles in a British higher education setting, 10.1348/00070990360626976
  4. Busato Vittorio V, Prins Frans J, Elshout Jan J, Hamaker Christiaan, The relation between learning styles, the Big Five personality traits and achievement motivation in higher education, 10.1016/s0191-8869(98)00112-3
  5. Chamorro-Premuzic Tomas, Furnham Adrian, Lewis Martin, Personality and approaches to learning predict preference for different teaching methods, 10.1016/j.lindif.2006.12.001
  6. Costa Jr. Paul T., McCrae Robert R., Domains and Facets: Hierarchical Personality Assessment Using the Revised NEO Personality Inventory, 10.1207/s15327752jpa6401_2
  7. De Maeyer Sven, van den Bergh Huub, Rymenans Rita, Van Petegem Peter, Rijlaarsdam Gert, Effectiveness criteria in school effectiveness studies: Further research on the choice for a multivariate model, 10.1016/j.edurev.2009.09.001
  8. Deci Edward L., Ryan Richard M., The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior, 10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01
  9. Dinsmore Daniel L., Alexander Patricia A., A Critical Discussion of Deep and Surface Processing: What It Means, How It Is Measured, the Role of Context, and Model Specification, 10.1007/s10648-012-9198-7
  10. Donche Vincent, Coertjens Liesje, Van Petegem Peter, Learning pattern development throughout higher education: A longitudinal study, 10.1016/j.lindif.2010.02.002
  11. Donche Vincent, Gijbels David, Understanding learning pattern development in higher education: A matter of time, context and measurement, 10.1016/j.stueduc.2012.11.002
  12. Donche Vincent, Van Petegem Peter, The development of learning patterns of student teachers: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study, 10.1007/s10734-008-9156-y
  13. Donche Vincent, Van Petegem Peter, Teacher educators' conceptions of learning to teach and related teaching strategies, 10.1080/02671522.2011.561979
  14. Entwistle Noel, McCune Velda, The Conceptual Bases of Study Strategy Inventories, 10.1007/s10648-004-0003-0
  15. Hoekstra, Handleiding NEO persoonlijkheidsvragenlijsten NEO-PI-R en NEO-FFI [Manual NEO Personality Questionnaires NEO-PI-R and NEO-FFI] (1996)
  16. Kember David, Gow Lyn, Orientations to Teaching and Their Effect on the Quality of Student Learning, 10.2307/2943877
  17. Mayer Richard E., Should There Be a Three-Strikes Rule Against Pure Discovery Learning?, 10.1037/0003-066x.59.1.14
  18. Nieminen Juha, Lindblom-Ylänne Sari, Lonka Kirsti, The Development of Study Orientations and Study Success in Students of Pharmacy, 10.1023/b:truc.0000044642.35553.e5
  19. Postareff Liisa, Lindblom-Ylänne Sari, Variation in teachers' descriptions of teaching: Broadening the understanding of teaching in higher education, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.01.008
  20. Prosser Michael, Ramsden Paul, Trigwell Keith, Martin Elaine, Dissonance in Experience of Teaching and its Relation to the Quality of Student Learning, 10.1080/03075070309299
  21. Richardson John T.E., Approaches to studying, conceptions of learning and learning styles in higher education, 10.1016/j.lindif.2010.11.015
  22. Vallerand Robert J., Pelletier Luc G., Blais Marc R., Briere Nathalie M., Senecal Caroline, Vallieres Evelyne F., The Academic Motivation Scale: A Measure of Intrinsic, Extrinsic, and Amotivation in Education, 10.1177/0013164492052004025
  23. Vansteenkiste Maarten, Zhou Mingming, Lens Willy, Soenens Bart, Experiences of Autonomy and Control Among Chinese Learners: Vitalizing or Immobilizing?, 10.1037/0022-0663.97.3.468
  24. Vanthournout, Style differences in cognition, learning and management: Theory, research and practice, 78 (2011)
  25. Vermetten Yvonne J., Lodewijks Hans G., Vermunt Jan D., The Role of Personality Traits and Goal Orientations in Strategy Use, 10.1006/ceps.1999.1042
  26. Vermunt Jan D., The regulation of constructive learning processes, 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1998.tb01281.x
  27. Vermunt Jan D, Verloop Nico, Congruence and friction between learning and teaching, 10.1016/s0959-4752(98)00028-0
  28. Vermunt Jan D., Vermetten Yvonne J., Patterns in Student Learning: Relationships Between Learning Strategies, Conceptions of Learning, and Learning Orientations, 10.1007/s10648-004-0005-y
Bibliographic reference Donche, Vincent ; De Maeyer, Sven ; Coertjens, Liesje ; Van Daal, Tine ; Van Petegem, Peter. Differential use of learning strategies in first-year higher education: The impact of personality, academic motivation, and teaching strategies. In: British Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 83, no.2, p. 238-251 (2013)
Permanent URL http://hdl.handle.net/2078/201442