Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Forschungspapier

Secretary and Online Matching Problems with Machine Learned Advice

MPG-Autoren
/persons/resource/persons254978

Gouleakis,  Themis
Algorithms and Complexity, MPI for Informatics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons250027

Kleer,  Pieter
Algorithms and Complexity, MPI for Informatics, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons136381

Kolev,  Pavel
Algorithms and Complexity, MPI for Informatics, Max Planck Society;

Externe Ressourcen
Es sind keine externen Ressourcen hinterlegt
Volltexte (beschränkter Zugriff)
Für Ihren IP-Bereich sind aktuell keine Volltexte freigegeben.
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)

arXiv:2006.01026.pdf
(Preprint), 810KB

Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Antoniadis, A., Gouleakis, T., Kleer, P., & Kolev, P. (2020). Secretary and Online Matching Problems with Machine Learned Advice. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.01026.


Zitierlink: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0007-8B7A-4
Zusammenfassung
The classical analysis of online algorithms, due to its worst-case nature,
can be quite pessimistic when the input instance at hand is far from
worst-case. Often this is not an issue with machine learning approaches, which
shine in exploiting patterns in past inputs in order to predict the future.
However, such predictions, although usually accurate, can be arbitrarily poor.
Inspired by a recent line of work, we augment three well-known online settings
with machine learned predictions about the future, and develop algorithms that
take them into account. In particular, we study the following online selection
problems: (i) the classical secretary problem, (ii) online bipartite matching
and (iii) the graphic matroid secretary problem. Our algorithms still come with
a worst-case performance guarantee in the case that predictions are subpar
while obtaining an improved competitive ratio (over the best-known classical
online algorithm for each problem) when the predictions are sufficiently
accurate. For each algorithm, we establish a trade-off between the competitive
ratios obtained in the two respective cases.