English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Preprint

Multiple mechanisms mediate the suppression of motion vision during escape maneuvers in flying Drosophila

MPS-Authors
/persons/resource/persons270745

Fischer,  Philippe
Emmy Noether Group Neurobiology of Flight Control, Max Planck Institute for Neurobiology of Behavior – caesar, Max Planck Society;

/persons/resource/persons39057

Schnell,  Bettina
Emmy Noether Group Neurobiology of Flight Control, Max Planck Institute for Neurobiology of Behavior – caesar, Max Planck Society;

External Resource
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Fischer, P., & Schnell, B. (2022). Multiple mechanisms mediate the suppression of motion vision during escape maneuvers in flying Drosophila. bioRxiv: the preprint server for biology, 2022.02.03.478949. doi:10.1101/2022.02.03.478949.


Cite as: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000A-2016-9
Abstract
Animals must be able to discriminate self-generated (reafferent) from external (exafferent) sensory input. Otherwise, the former could interfere with perception and behavioral actions. The way this can be achieved is through an efference copy, which suppresses reafferent sensory input. An example for this is the optomotor response of the fly. With the optomotor response, flies stabilize a straight flight path by correcting for unintended deviations, which they sense as visual motion of their surrounding or optic flow. HS cells of the fly are tuned to rotational optic flow and are thought to mediate optomotor responses to horizontal motion. It has been shown that during spontaneous turns, an efference copy influences the membrane potential of HS cells. Here we investigate the influence of an efference copy during looming-elicited evasive turns combined with a subsequent optomotor stimulus in Drosophila. We show that looming stimuli themselves can influence the processing of preferred-direction motion in HS cells. In addition, an efference copy can influence visual processing during saccades in both directions, but only in a subset of cells. Our study supports the notion that processing of sensory information is finely tuned and dependent on both stimulus history and behavioral context.