Aportes de la supervisión de las intervenciones en lo social a la consolidación del proyecto profesional frente al avance neo conservador y neoliberal en Argentina
Archivos
Fecha
2017
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Escuela de Trabajo Social. Facultad de Ciencia Política y Relaciones Internacionales. Universidad Nacional de Rosario
Resumen
Descripción
El escenario actual de la intervención
en lo social es complejo. La asunción
a fines del año 2015, de la nueva
administración del gobierno
nacional, introdujo una serie de
reformas que materializan al avance
neoliberal y neo conservador en
Argentina (Alayón, 2016); colocando
en disputa la ampliación de derechos
humanos alcanzados en el ciclo
nacional, popular y democrático
(Madoery, 2013). Esta situación
ha profundizado, entre otras
cosas, la escisión existente entre
la enunciación de intervenciones
sociales en el marco de los derechos
humanos y las que se desarrollan
subordinadas aun, a ese orden
social institucional dominante que
se mantuvo y mantiene ajeno a
las interpelaciones que desde del
Trabajo Social emancipador (Agüero
& Martínez, 2014) y descolonial
(Hermida & Meschini, 2015)
se realizan. Cabe preguntarse,
entonces, ¿es posible en este
escenario continuar sosteniendo
la posición ético-política que
promulga la ley nacional y federal
de Trabajo Social?, ¿cómo es
posible sostener esta posición en las
instituciones frente a un discurso
gubernamental desinstituyente de
los derechos humanos?, ¿cuáles son
los dispositivos que contribuyen
al desarrollo de intervenciones
sociales con enfoque de derechos?
Como parte de las respuestas a
algunas de estas preguntas se
propone a la supervisión de las
intervenciones sociales desde un
pensar situado como un dispositivo de análisis crítico e integral que
constituye la base indispensable
para la comprensión del campo
problemático del Trabajo Social
(Rozas Pagaza, 2001).
The current stage of social intervencion has changed. The inauguration of the new federal government at the end of 2015 introduced a series of reforms that materialize the neo liberal and neo-conservative advance in Argentina (Alayon, 2016); Putting in dispute the extension of human rights reached in the Kirchnerist cycle of government. This situation has deepened, among others, the division between the declaration of social interventions in the framework of human rights and those that are in fact subordinated to the dominant institutional social order that was maintained and kept outside the interpellations made by the anti-opressive (Agüero, Martinez, 2014) and anti-colonial (Hermida, Meschini, 2015) Social Work frameworks. Is it possible, at this stage, to continue to support the ethical and political position that the national and federal social work law promulgates? How is it possible to sustain this position in the institutions in front of a governmental discourse that is instituting human rights? What are the devices that contribute to the development of social interventions with a human rights approach? As part of the answers to some of these questions, it is proposed that social interventions be supervised from a critical thinking standpoint and that an integral analysis device be implemented, which would constitute that constitutes an indispensable basis for understanding the problematic field of Social Work (Rozas Pagaza, 2001).
The current stage of social intervencion has changed. The inauguration of the new federal government at the end of 2015 introduced a series of reforms that materialize the neo liberal and neo-conservative advance in Argentina (Alayon, 2016); Putting in dispute the extension of human rights reached in the Kirchnerist cycle of government. This situation has deepened, among others, the division between the declaration of social interventions in the framework of human rights and those that are in fact subordinated to the dominant institutional social order that was maintained and kept outside the interpellations made by the anti-opressive (Agüero, Martinez, 2014) and anti-colonial (Hermida, Meschini, 2015) Social Work frameworks. Is it possible, at this stage, to continue to support the ethical and political position that the national and federal social work law promulgates? How is it possible to sustain this position in the institutions in front of a governmental discourse that is instituting human rights? What are the devices that contribute to the development of social interventions with a human rights approach? As part of the answers to some of these questions, it is proposed that social interventions be supervised from a critical thinking standpoint and that an integral analysis device be implemented, which would constitute that constitutes an indispensable basis for understanding the problematic field of Social Work (Rozas Pagaza, 2001).
Palabras clave
Trabajo Social, Supervisión, Intervención profesional, Pensar situado