The creation of a Pedagogy of promise: examples of educational excellence in high-stakes science classrooms

The current reform movement in education has two forces that appear contradictory in nature. The first is an emphasis on rigor and accountability that is assessed through high-stakes testing. The second is the recommendation to have student-centered approaches to teaching and learning, especially those that emphasize inquiry methodology and constructivist pedagogy. Literature reports that current reform efforts involving accountability through high-stakes tests are detrimental to student learning and are contradictory to student-centered teaching approaches. However, by focusing attention on those teachers who “teach against the grain” and raise the achievement levels of students from diverse backgrounds, instructional strategies and personal characteristics of exemplary teachers can be identified. This mixed-methods research study investigated four exemplary urban high school science teachers in high-stakes (TAKS) tested science classrooms. Classroom observations, teacher and student interviews, pre-/post-content tests and the Constructivist Learning Environment Survey (CLES) (Johnson & McClure, 2004) provided the main data sources. The How People Learn (National Research Council, 2000) theoretical framework provided evidence of elements of inquiry-based, student-centered teaching. Descriptive case analysis (Yin, 1994) and quantitative analysis of pre/post tests and the CLES revealed the following results. First, all participating teachers included elements of learner-centeredness, knowledge-centeredness, assessment-centeredness and community-centeredness in their teaching as recommended by the National Research Council, (2000), thus creating student-centered classroom environments. Second, by establishing a climate of caring where students felt supported and motivated to learn, teachers managed tensions resulting from the incorporation of student-centered elements and the accountability-based instructional mandates outlined by their school district and state agencies. For example, their classroom climate was fair and democratic with elements of mutual respect, student advocacy, the freedom to make mistakes, and student-teacher negotiation practices. Common teacher qualities included being enthusiastic, life-long learners with high expectations for students. When teachers did not agree with administrative mandates that were not in the best interest of their students, they utilized a “close-door” policy. This report provides recommendations including the increased development of student-centered curricula, using multiple test-criteria versus one single standardized test, and increased teacher training to assist in the creation of a climate of caring. Future studies are also suggested.