WEKO3
-
RootNode
アイテム
根本分裂の原因に関する一考察
https://doi.org/10.15083/00037051
https://doi.org/10.15083/000370519db0c84c-7584-45b5-85eb-0d4f475d32b8
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
![]() |
|
Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2011-06-30 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | 根本分裂の原因に関する一考察 | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
ID登録 | ||||||
ID登録 | 10.15083/00037051 | |||||
ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
その他のタイトル | ||||||
その他のタイトル | A Reconsideration of the Cause of the Initial Schism in Buddhist Monasteries | |||||
著者 |
李, 慈郎
× 李, 慈郎 |
|||||
著者別名 | ||||||
識別子Scheme | WEKO | |||||
識別子 | 136170 | |||||
姓名 | Lee, Ja-rang | |||||
著者所属 | ||||||
著者所属 | 東京大学大学院 | |||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | This paper will rethink the cause of the initial schism in Buddhist monasteries, a long-standing controversial problem, mainly with the help of two persuasive works, one an ancient text, the Śāriputraparipŗcchāsūtra, which belongs to the Mahāsāńghika, and the other a modern work by Bareau[1955a]. In explaining the characteristics of the subjects of the primary schism, Bareau[1955a] pays special attention to the general agreement of the accounts of the related materials, which always relate that the conflict was caused by the environmental differences between two groups, one a western group and the other an eastern one, although it is unclear which was the Sthaviravāda and which the Mahāsāńghika, notwithstanding the arbitrary assumption by Hofinger[1946]. Bareau claims that the eastern monks must have lived a much more comfortable life provided with sufficient daily needs or facilities by a greater number of lay people as compared with the western monks, who seem to have been compelled to live an austere way of life in a rather infertile environment. This suggestive observation leads us to another chronicle text, the Śāriputraparipŗcchāsūtra, which informs us that there was a serious conflict between the Sthaviravāda and the Mahāsāńghika concerning the question of whether it was possible to increase the number of pātimokkadhammas, with the latter severely accusing the former of arbitrariness in expanding the rules. This argument shows remarkable agreement with the fact that the number of rules in the existing Mahāsāńghika Vinaya is much smaller than that of the existing Sthaviravāda Vinayas. What is crucial here is that the difference in the number of rules is primarily rooted in the number included in the sekhiyadhammas, the Sthaviravāda Vinayas having almost twice the number of the Mahāsāńghika Vinaya. Sekhiyadhammas are rules which are mainly concerned with the behavior or etiquette required of monks in daily life, especially in the presence of lay people, and most likely seem to have been compiled with the intention of keeping monks in the favor of laymen. The increase in the number of sekhiyadhammas in the Sarvāstivāda or Mulasarvāstivāda Vinaya is therefore considered to reveal their tendencies to rely on supplies by donations, not their adherence to an austere life. All the relevant materials considered, a single cause of the first schism seems not only difficult to discover, and has not been to this day, but also less likely to have existed. In the course of time, as the Buddhist monasteries expanded, differences derived from local distinctions must have been so distinctively manifested that all monasteries could not maintain their coherency and, as has been pointed out by Bechert[1982] with respect to sīmā, gradually divided one from another. The Śāriputraparipŗcchāsūtra and the extant Vinayas suggest that this conjecture is highly possible. | |||||
書誌情報 |
インド哲学仏教学研究 巻 5, p. 18-30, 発行日 1998-03-20 |
|||||
ISSN | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
収録物識別子 | 09197907 | |||||
書誌レコードID | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
収録物識別子 | AN10419736 | |||||
フォーマット | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | application/pdf | |||||
日本十進分類法 | ||||||
主題Scheme | NDC | |||||
主題 | 126 | |||||
出版者 | ||||||
出版者 | 東京大学大学院人文社会系研究科・文学部インド哲学仏教学研究室 | |||||
出版者別名 | ||||||
Department of Indian Philosophy and Buddhist Studies, Graduate School of Humanities and Sociology, University of Tokyo |