Beliefs in the population about cracking sounds produced during spinal manipulation

[en] Objectives: To examine beliefs about cracking sounds heard during highvelocity lowamplitude (HVLA) thrust spinal manipulation in individuals with and without personal experience of this technique. Methods: We included 100 individuals. Among them, 60 had no history of spinal manipulation, including 40whowereasymptomatic with or without a past history of spinal pain and 20whohad nonspecific spinal pain. The remaining 40 patients had a history of spinal manipulation;amongthem, 20 were asymptomatic and 20 had spinal pain. Participants attended a oneonone interview during which they completed a questionnaire about their history of spinal manipulation and their beliefs regarding sounds heard during spinal manipulation. Results: Mean age was 43.5±15.4 years. The sounds were ascribed to vertebral repositioning by 49% of participants and to friction between two vertebras by 23% of participants; only 9% of participants correctly ascribed the sound to the release of gas. The sound was mistakenly considered to indicate successful spinal manipulation by 40% of participants. No differences in beliefs were found between the groups with and without a history of spinal manipulation. Conclusions: Certain beliefs have documented adverse effects. This study showed a high prevalence of unfounded beliefs regarding spinal manipulation. These beliefs deserve greater attention from healthcare providers, particularly those who practice spinal manipulation.

Disciplines :

Orthopedics, rehabilitation & sports medicine

Author, co-author :

Demoulin, Christophe ; Université de Liège > Département des sciences de la motricité > Kinésithérapie spécifique et réadaptation motrice

Baeri, Damien

TOUSSAINT, Geoffrey ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Service de médecine de l'appareil locomoteur

CAGNIE, Barbara

BEERNAERT, Axel

Kaux, Jean-François ; Université de Liège > Département des sciences de la motricité > Médecine physique, réadaptation et traumatologie du sport

Vanderthommen, Marc ; Université de Liège > Département des sciences de la motricité > Kinésithérapie spécifique et réadaptation motrice

Language :

English

Title :

Beliefs in the population about cracking sounds produced during spinal manipulation

Publication date :

March 2018

Journal title :

Joint Bone Spine

ISSN :

1297-319X

eISSN :

1778-7254

Publisher :

Elsevier Science, Paris, France

Volume :

Issue :

Pages :

239-242

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Available on ORBi :

since 13 November 2017

Statistics

Number of views

198 (15 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

3 (1 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

Bibliography

Bialosky, J.E., Bishop, M.D., Price, D.D., et al. The mechanisms of manual therapy in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain: a comprehensive model. Man Ther 14 (2009), 531–538.
LaBan, M.M., Taylor, R.S., Manipulation: an objective analysis of the literature. Orthop Clin North Am 23 (1992), 451–459.
Pettman, E., A history of manipulative therapy. JMMT 15 (2007), 165–174.
Gross, A., Miller, J., D'Sylva, J., et al. Manipulation or mobilisation for neck pain: a Cochrane review. Man Ther 15 (2010), 315–333.
Rubinstein, S.M., van Middelkoop, M., Assendelft, W.J., et al. Spinal manipulative therapy for chronic low-back pain: an update of a Cochrane review. Spine 36 (2011), E825–E846.
Chenot, J.F., Becker, A., Leonhardt, C., et al. Use of complementary alternative medicine for low back pain consulting in general practice: a cohort study. BMC Complement Altern Med, 7, 2007, 42.
Vautravers, P., Isner-Horobeti, M.E., Maigne, J.Y., Manipulations vertébrales - ostéopathie. Évidence/ignorances. Rev Rhum 76 (2009), 405–409.
Bialosky, J.E., George, S.Z., Bishop, M.D., How spinal manipulative therapy works: why ask why?. JOSPT 38 (2008), 293–295.
Gibbons, P., Tehan, P., HVLA thrust techniques: what are the risks?. Int J Osteopathic Med 9 (2006), 4–12.
Gibbons, P., Tehan, P., Spinal manipulation: indications, risks and benefits. J Bodywork Mov Ther 5 (2001), 110–119.
Puentedura, E.J., March, J., Anders, J., et al. Safety of cervical spine manipulation: are adverse events preventable and are manipulations being performed appropriately? A review of 134 case reports. JMMT 20 (2012), 66–74.
Maigne, J.Y., Vautravers, P., Mechanism of action of spinal manipulative therapy. Joint Bone Spine 70 (2003), 336–341.
Sweetman, B.J., Clicks and clunks with low back pain; what do they mean? A literature review. Int Musculoskelet Med 31 (2009), 25–28.
Roston, J.B., Haines, R.W., Cracking in the metacarpo-phalangeal joint. J Anat 81 (1947), 165–173.
Watson, P., Mollan, R.A., Cineradiography of a cracking joint. Br J Radiol 63 (1990), 145–147.
Cramer, G.D., Ross, K., Raju, P.K., et al. Quantification of cavitation and gapping of lumbar zygapophyseal joints during spinal manipulative therapy. JMPT 35 (2012), 614–621.
Kawchuk, G.N., Fryer, J., Jaremko, J.L., et al. Real-time visualization of joint cavitation. Plos One, 10, 2015, e0119470.
Gouin, M., Dey, M., Étude sur la perception du patient concernant le bruit articulaire lors d'une manipulation haute vélocité basse amplitude. Rev Osteopath 13 (2014), 29–37.
Demoulin, C., Roussel, N., Marty, M., et al. The maladaptive beliefs of patients with low back pain. A narrative review. Rev Med Liege 71 (2016), 40–46.
Wlodyka-Demaille, S., Poiraudeau, S., Catanzariti, J.F., et al. French translation and validation of 3 functional disability scales for neck pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83 (2002), 376–382.
Coste, J., Le Parc, J.M., Berge, E., et al. French validation of a disability rating scale for the evaluation of low back pain (EIFEL questionnaire). Rev Rhum Ed Fr 60 (1993), 335–341.
Foster, N.E., Bishop, A., Thomas, E., et al. Illness perceptions of low back pain patients in primary care: what are they, do they change and are they associated with outcome?. Pain 136 (2008), 177–187.
Pincus, T., Vogel, S., Burton, A.K., et al. Fear avoidance and prognosis in back pain: a systematic review and synthesis of current evidence. Arthritis Rheum 54 (2006), 3999–4010.
Rainville, J., Smeets, R.J., Bendix, T., et al. Fear-avoidance beliefs and pain avoidance in low back pain–translating research into clinical practice. Spine J 11 (2011), 895–903.
Ng, S.K., Cicuttini, F.M., Wang, Y., et al. Negative beliefs about low back pain are associated with persistent high intensity low back pain. Psychol Health Med 12 (2016), 1–10.
Pincus, T., Smeets, R.J., Simmonds, M.J., et al. The fear avoidance model disentangled: improving the clinical utility of the fear avoidance model. Clin J Pain 26 (2010), 739–746.
Woby, S.R., Urmston, M., Watson, P.J., Self-efficacy mediates the relation between pain-related fear and outcome in chronic low back pain patients. Eur J Pain 11 (2007), 711–718.
Keedy, N.H., Keffala, V.J., Altmaier, E.M., et al. Health locus of control and self-efficacy predict back pain rehabilitation outcomes. Iowa Orthop J 34 (2014), 158–165.
Zusman, M., Spinal pain patients’ beliefs about pain and physiotherapy. Aust J Physiother 30 (1984), 145–151.
Darlow, B., Dowell, A., Baxter, G.D., et al. The enduring impact of what clinicians say to people with low back pain. Ann Fam Med 11 (2013), 527–534.
Buchbinder, R., Self-management education en masse: effectiveness of the back pain: Don't Take It Lying Down mass media campaign. Med J Aust 189 (2008), S29–S32.
Gross, D.P., Russell, A.S., Ferrari, R., et al. Evaluation of a Canadian back pain mass media campaign. Spine 35 (2010), 906–913.
Buchbinder, R., Jolley, D., Population based intervention to change back pain beliefs: three year follow up population survey. BMJ, 328, 2004, 321.
Flynn, T.W., Childs, J.D., Fritz, J.M., The audible pop from high-velocity thrust manipulation and outcome in individuals with low back pain. JMPT 29 (2006), 40–45.
Flynn, T.W., Fritz, J.M., Wainner, R.S., et al. The audible pop is not necessary for successful spinal high-velocity thrust manipulation in individuals with low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 84 (2003), 1057–1060.
Bialosky, J.E., Bishop, M.D., Robinson, M.E., George, S.Z., The relationship of the audible pop to hypoalgesia associated with high-velocity, low-amplitude thrust manipulation: a secondary analysis of an experimental study in pain-free participants. JMPT 33 (2010), 117–124.
Dunning, J., Mourad, F., Barbero, M., et al. Bilateral and multiple cavitation sounds during upper cervical thrust manipulation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 14, 2013, 24.
Ross, J.K., Bereznick, D.E., McGill, S.M., Determining cavitation location during lumbar and thoracic spinal manipulation: is spinal manipulation accurate and specific?. Spine 29 (2004), 1452–1457.
Bakker, M., Miller, J., Does an audible release improve the outcome of a chiropractic adjustment?. J Can Chiropr Assoc 48 (2004), 237–239.
Reggars, J.W., The therapeutic benefit of the audible release associated with spinal manipulative therapy. A critical review of the literature. Australas Chiropr Osteopathy 7 (1998), 80–85.