Article (Scientific journals)
Denosumab or zoledronic acid in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis previously treated with oral bisphosphonates
Miller, P. D.; Pannacciulli, N.; Brown, J. P. et al.
2016In Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 101 (8), p. 3163-3170
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
Denosumab or zoledronic acid in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis previously treated with oral bisphosphonates.pdf
Publisher postprint (165.48 kB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Article; Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal; Administration, Oral; Aged; Bone Density; Bone Density Conservation Agents; Denosumab; Diphosphonates; Double-Blind Method; Drug Substitution; Female; Humans; Imidazoles; Middle Aged
Abstract :
[en] Context: Denosumab and zoledronic acid (ZOL) are parenteral treatments for patients with osteoporosis. Objective: The objective of the study was to compare the effect of transitioning from oral bisphosphonates to denosumab or ZOL on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover. Design and Setting: This was an international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial. Participants:Atotal of 643 postmenopausalwomenwith osteoporosis previously treated with oral bisphosphonates participated in the study. Interventions: Subjects were randomized 1:1 to scdenosumab60mgevery 6 months plus iv placebo once or ZOL 5 mg iv once plus sc placebo every 6 months for 12 months. Main Outcome Measures: Changes in BMD and bone turnover markers were measured. Results: BMD change from baseline at month 12 was significantly greater with denosumab compared with ZOL at the lumbar spine (primary end point; 3.2% vs 1.1%; P < .0001), total hip (1.9% vs 0.6%; P < .0001), femoral neck (1.2% vs -0.1%; P < .0001), and one-third radius (0.6% vs 0.0%; P < .05). The median decrease from baseline was greater with denosumab than ZOL for serum C-telopeptide of type 1 collagen at all time points after day 10 and for serum procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide at month 1 and at all time points after month 3 (all P < .05). Median percentage changes from baseline in serum intact PTH were significantly greater at months 3 and 9 with denosumab compared with ZOL (all P < .05). Adverse events were similar between groups. Three events consistent with the definition of atypical femoral fracture were observed (two denosumab and one ZOL). Conclusions: In postmenopausal women with osteoporosis previously treated with oral bisphosphonates, denosumab was associated with greaterBMDincreases at all measured skeletal sites and greater inhibition of bone remodeling compared with ZOL.
Disciplines :
General & internal medicine
Author, co-author :
Miller, P. D.;  Colorado Center for Bone Research, 3190 South Wadsworth Boulevard, Lakewood, CO, United States
Pannacciulli, N.;  Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, United States
Brown, J. P.;  Laval University, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec Research Centre, Québec City, QC, Canada
Czerwinski, E.;  Krakow Medical Center, Krakow, Poland
Nedergaard, B. S.;  Center for Clinical and Basic Research, Aalborg, Aalborg, Denmark
Bolognese, M. A.;  Bethesda Health Research Center, Bethesda, MD, United States
Malouf, J.;  Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
Bone, H. G.;  Michigan Bone and Mineral Clinic, Detroit, MI, United States
Reginster, Jean-Yves  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Santé publique, Epidémiologie et Economie de la santé
Singer, A.;  Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States
Wang, C.;  Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, United States
Wagman, R. B.;  Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, United States
Cummings, S. R.;  San Francisco Coordinating Center, California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, United States
More authors (3 more) Less
Title :
Denosumab or zoledronic acid in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis previously treated with oral bisphosphonates
Publication date :
2016
Journal title :
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
ISSN :
0021-972X
eISSN :
1945-7197
Publisher :
Endocrine Society
Volume :
101
Issue :
8
Pages :
3163-3170
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 04 December 2017

Statistics


Number of views
70 (2 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
0 (0 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
163
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
153
OpenCitations
 
139

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi