Migration and Access to Welfare Benefits in the EU: The Interplay between Residence and Nationality

Vintila, Cristina-Daniela; Lafleur, Jean-Michel

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-51241-5_1

Download

Contribution to collective works (Parts of books)

Migration and Access to Welfare Benefits in the EU: The Interplay between Residence and Nationality

Vintila, Cristina-Daniela; Lafleur, Jean-Michel

2020 • In Lafleur, Jean-Michel; Vintila, Cristina-Daniela (Eds.) Migration and Social Protection in Europe and Beyond (Volume 1): Comparing Access to Welfare Entitlements

Peer reviewed

Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2268/231409

DOI
10.1007/978-3-030-51241-5_1

Files (1)Send to Details Statistics Bibliography Similar publications

Files

Full Text

Vintila-Lafleur2020_Chapter_MigrationAndAccessToWelfareBen.pdf

Publisher postprint (994.57 kB)

Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to

RIS BibTex APA Chicago Permalink X Linkedin

Details

Keywords :

Migration; Welfare benefits; European Union

Abstract :

[en] Increasing mobility to and from European Union (EU) countries has started to challenge the principles of territoriality and national citizenship through which European democracies traditionally conditioned access to social benefits. Existing typologies of immigrant social protection regimes do not seem to adequately capture (nor explain) the diverse repertoire of policy configurations through which European welfare regimes adapt to migration-driven societal dynamics. This introductory chapter provides a critical reflection on the link between migration and access to welfare in the EU. In doing so, it aims to propose a comprehensive analytical framework that allows for a systematic comparison of the inclusiveness of social protection systems towards mobile individuals. We argue that states’ responsiveness towards the social protection needs of their immigrant and emigrant populations has to be examined through a combination of factors, including the characteristics of these populations, the migration history of these countries, as well as the main features of their welfare state.

Disciplines :

Political science, public administration & international relations

Author, co-author :

Vintila, Cristina-Daniela ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences sociales > Centre d'études de l'ethnicité et des migrations (CEDEM)

Lafleur, Jean-Michel ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences sociales > Centre d'études de l'ethnicité et des migrations (CEDEM)

Language :

English

Title :

Migration and Access to Welfare Benefits in the EU: The Interplay between Residence and Nationality

Publication date :

2020

Main work title :

Migration and Social Protection in Europe and Beyond (Volume 1): Comparing Access to Welfare Entitlements

Author, co-author :

Lafleur, Jean-Michel ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Institut de recherche en Sciences Sociales (IRSS) > IRSS: Centre d'Etudes de l'Ethnicité et des Migrations

Vintila, Cristina-Daniela ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences sociales

Publisher :

Springer

Edition :

IMISCOE Research Series

ISBN/EAN :

978-3-030-51241-5

Pages :

1-32

Peer reviewed :

Peer reviewed

Additional URL :

https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-51241-5_1

European Projects :

H2020 - 680014 - MiTSoPro - Migration and Transnational Social Protection in (post-)crisis Europe

Name of the research project :

Migration and transnational social protection in (post)crisis Europe (MiTSoPro)

Funders :

CER - Conseil Européen de la Recherche [BE]
CE - Commission Européenne [BE]

Available on ORBi :

since 15 January 2019

Statistics

Number of views

237 (12 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

152 (4 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

Bibliography

Andersen, J. G., & Bjørklund, T. (1990). Structural changes and new cleavages: The progress parties in Denmark and Norway. Acta Sociologica, 33(2), 195–217.
Arrighi, J.-T., Bauböck, R., Collyer, M., Hutcheson, D., Moraru, M., Khadar, L., & Shaw, J. (2013). Franchise and electoral participation of third country citizens residing in the European Union and of EU citizens residing in third countries. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa. eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=IPOL-AFCO_ET(2013)474441. Accessed 05 May 2020.
Arts, W., & Gelissen, J. (2002). Three worlds of welfare capitalism or more? A state-of-the-art report. Journal of European Social Policy, 12(2), 137–158.
Avato, J., Koettl, J., & Sabates-Wheeler, R. (2010). Social security regimes, global estimates, and good practices: The status of social protection for international migrants. World Development, 38(4), 455–466.
Banting, K. G. (2010). Is there a progressive’s dilemma in Canada? Immigration, multiculturalism and the welfare state: Presidential address to the Canadian Political Science Association, Montreal, June 2, 2010. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 43(4), 797–820. https://doi. org/10.1017/S0008423910000983.
Barbulescu, R., Lafleur, J.-M., & Stanek, M. (2015). Intra-European mobility: Patterns of immigration flows and policies. Western Europe, 2016, 35–39.
Barglowski, K., Bilecen, B., & Amelina, A. (2015). Approaching transnational social protection: Methodological challenges and empirical applications. Population, Space and Place, 21(3), 215–226. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.1935.
Bird, K., Saalfeld, T., & Wüst, A. M. (2011). The political representation of immigrants and minorities: Voters, parties and parliaments in liberal democracies. New York: Routledge.
Blauberger, M., & Schmidt, S. (2014). Welfare migration? Free movement of EU citizens and access to social benefits. Research and Politics, I, 7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168014563879.
Bommes, M., & Geddes, A. (2000). Immigration and welfare. Challenging the borders of the welfare state. New York: Routledge.
Bonoli, G. (1997). Classifying welfare states: A two-dimension approach. Journal of Social Policy, 26(3), 351–372.
Borjas, G. J. (1998). Immigration and welfare magnets. Journal of Labor Economics, 17(4), 607–637.
Bruzelius, C. (2019). Freedom of movement, social rights and residence-based conditionality in the European Union. Journal of European Social Policy, 29(1), 70–83. https://doi. org/10.1177/0958928718756262.
de Lange, S. L. (2007). A new winning formula? The programmatic appeal of the radical right. Party Politics, 13(4), 411–435.
Deacon, B., & Nita, S. (2013). Regional social integration and free movement across borders: The role of social policy in enabling and preventing access to social entitlements by cross-border movers. European Union and Southern Africa compared. Regions & Cohesion, 3(1), 32–61.
Eisele, K. (2018). Social security coordination in association agreements: Is a common EU approach with third countries in sight? European Journal of Social Security, 20(2), 116–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1388262718771785.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Ferrera, M. (1996). The “Southern” model of welfare in social Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 6(1), 17–37.
Freeman, G. P. (1986). Migration and the political economy of the welfare state. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 485, 51–63.
Gamlen, A. (2008). The emigration state and the modern geopolitical imagination. Political Geography, 27, 840–856.
Giulietti, C. (2014). The welfare magnet hypothesis and the welfare take-up of migrants (pp. 1–37). Bonn: IZA World of Labor. https://doi.org/10.15185/izawol.37.
Guiraudon, V. (2002). Including foreigners in national welfare states: Institutional venues and rules of the game. In B. Rothstein & S. Steinmo (Eds.), Restructuring the welfare state: Political institutions and policy change. New York: Palgrave.
Holzmann, R. (2016). Do bilateral social security agreements deliver on the portability of pensions and health care benefits? A summary policy paper on four migration corridors between EU and non-EU member states. IZA Journal of European Labor Studies, 5(17), 1–35.
Holzmann, R., Koettl, J., & Chernetsky, T. (2005). Portability regimes of pension and health care benefits for international migrants. An analysis of issues and good practices. World Bank Social Protection Research Paper. Geneva: Global Commission on International Migration.
Kitschelt, H., & McGann, A. (1995). The radical right in Western Europe: A comparative analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Koopmans, R., & Michalowski, I. (2017). Why do states extend rights to immigrants? Institutional settings and historical legacies across 44 countries worldwide. Comparative Political Studies, 50(1), 41–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016655533.
Kramer, D., Thierry, J., & van Hooren, F. (2018). Responding to free movement: Quarantining mobile union citizens in European welfare states. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(10), 1501–1521. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1488882.
Kvist, J., Fritzell, J., Hvinden, B., & Kangas, O. (Eds.). (2012). Changing social equality: The Nordic welfare model in the 21st century. Bristol: Policy Press.
Lafleur, J.-M. (2013). Transnational politics and the state. The external voting rights of diasporas. New York: Routledge.
Lafleur, J.-M., & Mescoli, E. (2018). Creating undocumented EU migrants through welfare: A conceptualization of undeserving and precarious citizenship. Sociology, 52(3), 480–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038518764615.
Lafleur, J.-M., & Stanek, M. (2017). Restrictions to social protection by new Southern European migrants in Belgium. In J.-M. Lafleur & M. Stanek (Eds.), South-north migration of EU citizens in times of crisis (IMISCOE Research Series) (pp. 99–121). https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-319-39763-4_7.
Lafleur, J.-M., & Vintila, D. (Eds.). (2020a). Migration and social protection in Europe and beyond (Volume 2): Comparing consular services and diaspora policies. Cham: Springer.
Lafleur, J.-M., & Vintila, D. (Eds.). (2020b). Migration and social protection in Europe and beyond (Volume 3): A focus on non-EU sending states. Cham: Springer.
Lafleur, J.-M., & Vivas Romero, M. (2018). Combining transnational and intersectional approaches to immigrants’ social protection: The case of Andean families’ access to health. Comparative Migration Studies, 6(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-018-0073-7.
Larsen, J. E. (2005). The active society and activation policy: Ideologies, contexts and effects. In J. G. Andersen, A.-M. Guillemard, P. H. Jensen, & B. Pfau-Effinger (Eds.), The changing face of welfare: Consequences and outcomes from a citizenship perspective (pp. 135–150). Bristol: Bristol University Press.
Levitt, P., Viterna, J., Mueller, A., & Lloyd, C. (2017). Transnational social protection: Setting the agenda. Oxford Development Studies, 45(1), 2–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.201 6.1239702.
Maas, W. (2007). Creating European citizens. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Martinsen, D. S. (2005). The Europeanization of welfare – The domestic impact of intra-European social security. Journal of Common Market Studies, 43(5), 1027–1054.
Morissens, A., & Sainsbury, D. (2005). Migrants’ social rights, ethnicity and welfare regimes. Journal of Social Policy, 34(4), 637–660. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279405009190.
Österman, M., Palme, J., & Ruhs, M. (2019). National institutions and the fiscal impact of EU migrants. Working Paper REMINDER Project. Available at: https://www.reminder-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/REMINDER-D4.3-Institutions-and-Fiscal-Effects.pdf. Accessed 05 May 2020.
OECD (2015). Connecting with emigrants: A global profile of diasporas. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Palier, B. (Ed.). (2010). A long goodbye to Bismarck? The politics of welfare reform in continental Europe. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Rice, D. (2013). Beyond welfare regimes: From empirical typology to conceptual ideal types. Social Policy & Administration, 47, 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12001.
Römer, F. (2017). Generous to all or ‘insiders only’? The relationship between welfare state generosity and immigrant welfare rights. Journal of European Social Policy, 27(2), 173–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928717696441.
Ruhs, M., & Palme, J. (2018). Institutional contexts of political conflicts around free movement in the European Union: A theoretical analysis. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(10), 1481–1500. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1488883.
Rydgren, J. (2004). Explaining the emergence of radical right-wing populist parties: The case of Denmark. West European Politics, 27(3), 474–502. https://doi.org/10.108 0/0140238042000228103.
Sabates-Wheeler, R., & Feldman, R. (2011). Migration and social protection claiming social rights beyond borders. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sabates-Wheeler, R., & Koettl, J. (2010). Social protection for migrants: The challenges of delivery in the context of changing migration flows. International Social Security Review, 63, 115–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-246X.2010.01372.x.
Sainsbury, D. (2006). Immigrants’ social rights in comparative perspective: Welfare regimes, forms in immigration and immigration policy regimes. Journal of European Social Policy, 16(3), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928706065594.
Sainsbury, D. (2012). Welfare states and immigrant rights. In The politics of inclusion and exclusion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schmidt, S., Blauberger, M., & Martinsen, D. S. (2018). Free movement and equal treatment in an unequal union. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(10), 1391–1402. https://doi.org/10.108 0/13501763.2018.1488887.
Schmitt, C., & Teney, C. (2019). Access to general social protection for immigrants in advanced democracies. Journal of European Social Policy, 29(1), 44–55. https://doi. org/10.1177/0958928718768365.
Schumacher, G., & van Kersbergen, K. (2014). Do mainstream parties adapt to the welfare chauvinism of populist parties? Party Politics, 22(3), 300–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068814549345.
Seeleib-Kaiser, M., & Pennings, F. (2018). Intra-EU migration and social rights: An introduction. In M. Seeleib-Kaiser & F. Pennings (Eds.), EU citizenship and social rights. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788112710.00008.
Serra Mingot, E., & Mazzucato, V. (2017). Mobile populations in immobile welfare systems: A typology of institutions providing social welfare and protection within a mobility framework. The European Journal of Development Research, 29(4), 787–805. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-016-0061-4.
Shaw, J. (2007). The transformation of citizenship in Europe: Electoral rights and the restructuration of the political space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shutes, I. (2016). Work-related conditionality and the access to social benefits of national citizens, EU and non-EU citizens. Journal of Social Policy, 45(4), 691–707. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279416000234.
Strban, G. (2016). Family benefits in the EU: Is it still possible to coordinate them? Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 23(5), 775–795. https://doi.org/10.117 7/1023263X1602300503.
Van der Waal, J., Achterberg, P., Houtman, D., de Koster, W., & Manevska, K. (2010). ‘Some are more equal than others’: Economic egalitarianism and welfare chauvinism in the Netherlands. Journal of European Social Policy, 20(4), 350–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928710374376.
Van Der Waal, J., De Koster, W., & Van Oorschot, W. (2013). Three worlds of welfare chauvinism? How welfare regimes affect support for distributing welfare to immigrants in Europe. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 15(2), 164–181. https://doi.org/10.108 0/13876988.2013.785147.
Vintila, C. D. (2015). The European citizenship and the electoral rights of non-national EU citizens in the EU Member States. PhD dissertation, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid.
Vintila, D., & Morales, L. (2018). La representación política de las personas de origen inmigrante en España e Italia. Papers, 103(4), 521–550. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/papers.2505.
Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of justice: A defence of pluralism and equality. New York: Basic Books.