Whitaker Lynch Government and Opposition.pdf (446.7 kB)
Understanding the formation and actions of Eurosceptic groups in the European Parliament: pragmatism, principles and publicity
journal contribution
posted on 2013-10-21, 11:14 authored by Richard C. Whitaker, Philip LynchThis article assesses why Eurosceptic national parties form groups in the European Parliament (EP) and examines in what ways two of these groups – the European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) and Europe of Freedom and Democracy (EFD) – operate in the EP. It draws on interviews with politicians and group officials, roll-call votes and expert judgement data. We look at the group formation process with a focus on the British Conservatives and UK Independence Party (UKIP) and find that the ECR was created with a mixture of policy-seeking and party management aims. UKIP’s interest in the EFD is largely on the basis of distinctive practical advantages, such as resources for political campaigns. We provide evidence that hard Eurosceptic and regionalist niche parties in the EP struggle to agree with each other in roll-call votes on a range of subjects. Finally, we show that the hard and soft Eurosceptic parties studied here go about policy-seeking in different ways in the EP in line with their differing principles about the integration process.
History
Citation
Government and Opposition, in pressAuthor affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCE/Department of Politics and International RelationsVersion
- AM (Accepted Manuscript)
Published in
Government and OppositionPublisher
Cambridge University Press on behalf of Government and Oppositionissn
0017-257Xeissn
1477-7053Copyright date
2013Available date
2013-10-21Publisher version
http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=GOVNotes
This article has been accepted for publication and will appear in a revised form, subsequent to peer review and/or editorial input by Cambridge University Press, in Government and Opposition (Copyright © Government and Opposition Ltd 2013), published by Cambridge University Press.Language
enAdministrator link
Usage metrics
Categories
No categories selectedLicence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC