University of Leicester
Browse
journal.pone.0045723.pdf (300.16 kB)

Specifying the Probability Characteristics of Funnel Plot Control Limits: An Investigation of Three Approaches

Download (300.16 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2012-10-24, 08:57 authored by B. N. Manktelow, S. E. Seaton
Background: Emphasis is increasingly being placed on the monitoring and comparison of clinical outcomes between healthcare providers. Funnel plots have become a standard graphical methodology to identify outliers and comprise plotting an outcome summary statistic from each provider against a specified 'target' together with upper and lower control limits. With discrete probability distributions it is not possible to specify the exact probability that an observation from an 'in-control' provider will fall outside the control limits. However, general probability characteristics can be set and specified using interpolation methods. Guidelines recommend that providers falling outside such control limits should be investigated, potentially with significant consequences, so it is important that the properties of the limits are understood. Methods: Control limits for funnel plots for the Standardised Mortality Ratio (SMR) based on the Poisson distribution were calculated using three proposed interpolation methods and the probability calculated of an ‘in-control’ provider falling outside of the limits. Examples using published data were shown to demonstrate the potential differences in the identification of outliers. Results : The first interpolation method ensured that the probability of an observation of an ‘in control’ provider falling outside either limit was always less than a specified nominal probability (p). The second method resulted in such an observation falling outside either limit with a probability that could be either greater or less than p, depending on the expected number of events. The third method led to a probability that was always greater than, or equal to, p. Conclusion: The use of different interpolation methods can lead to differences in the identification of outliers. This is particularly important when the expected number of events is small. We recommend that users of these methods be aware of the differences, and specify which interpolation method is to be used prior to any analysis.

History

Citation

PLoS ONE, 2012, 7 (9), p. e45723

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

PLoS ONE

Publisher

Public Library of Science

eissn

1932-6203

Acceptance date

2012-08-24

Available date

2012-10-24

Publisher version

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0045723

Notes

PMCID: PMC3447868

Language

eng

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    Keywords

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC