University of Leicester
Browse
Investigating the effects of 6 months extended duration, in-centre nocturnal versus conventional haemodialysis treatment: a non-randomised, controlled feasibility study.pdf (878.38 kB)

Investigating the effects of 6 months extended duration, in-centre nocturnal versus conventional haemodialysis treatment: a non-randomised, controlled feasibility study.

Download (878.38 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2016-11-17, 16:21 authored by Darren R. Churchward, Matthew P. M. Graham-Brown, Robert Preston, Warren Pickering, Gerry P. McCann, James O. Burton
INTRODUCTION: In-centre nocturnal haemodialysis (INHD) is an underutilised dialysis regimen that can potentially provide patients with better clinical outcomes due to extended treatment times. We have established an INHD programme within our clinical network, fulfilling a previously unmet patient need. This feasibility study aims to gather sufficient data on numerous outcome measures to inform the design of a multicentre randomised controlled trial that will establish the potential benefits of INHD and increase the availability of this service nationally and internationally. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This will be a non-randomised controlled study. Prevalent patients on haemodialysis (HD) will electively change from a conventional in-centre HD regimen of 4 hours thrice weekly to a regimen of extended treatment times (5-8 hours) delivered in-centre overnight thrice weekly. After recruitment of the INHD cohort, a group of patients matched for age, gender and dialysis vintage will be selected from patients remaining on a conventional daytime dialysis programme. Outcome measures will include left ventricular mass as measured by MRI, physical performance measured by the short physical performance battery and physical activity measured by accelerometry. Additionally we will measure quality of life using validated questionnaires, nutritional status by bioimpedance spectroscopy and food diaries, and blood sampling for markers of cardiovascular disease, systemic inflammation. Suitable statistical tests shall be used to analyse the data. We will use omnibus tests to observe changes over the duration of the intervention and between groups. We will also look for associations between outcome measures that may warrant further investigation. These data will be used to inform the power calculation for future studies. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: A favourable opinion was granted by Northampton Research Ethics Committee (15/EM/0268). It is anticipated that results of this study will be presented at national and international meetings, with reports being published in journals during 2017. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN16672784.

Funding

This study was funded through a grant from the van Geest Heart and Cardiovascular Health Research Fund.

History

Citation

BMJ Open 2016;6:e012583

Author affiliation

/Organisation/COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND PSYCHOLOGY/School of Medicine/Department of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

BMJ Open 2016;6:e012583

Publisher

BMJ Publishing Group

issn

2044-6055

eissn

2044-6055

Acceptance date

2016-09-08

Available date

2016-11-17

Publisher version

http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/6/9/e012583

Notes

Anonymised participant level data will be made available to interested collaborators on request, following publication of final results manuscript.

Language

en

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    Keywords

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC