University of Leicester
Browse
MayoClinicProceedings_accepted pre-formatting.pdf (212.23 kB)

Associations between anthropometric measurements and cardiometabolic risk factors in White European and South Asian adults in the UK

Download (212.23 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2017-02-06, 14:58 authored by Farah F. Kidy, Nafeesa Dhalwani, Deirdre M. Harrington, Laura J. Gray, Danielle H. Bodicoat, David Webb, Melanie J. Davies, Kamlesh Khunti
Objective To investigate the association of 4 anthropometric measurements with cardiometabolic risk factors in a UK biethnic sample of South Asians (SAs) and white Europeans (WEs). Patients and Methods Baseline data were collected from adults of WE and SA origin participating in the Leicester arm of the Anglo-Danish-Dutch Study of Intensive Treatment in People with Screen Detected Diabetes in Primary Care (ADDITION-Leicester) study between August 2004 and December 2007. Overall, 6268 WE and SA adults had measures of body mass index, waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and waist-to-height ratio assessed between June 18, 2004, and December 4, 2007. Hypertension, dyslipidemia, and dysglycemia were established from venous blood samples using standard definitions. Crude and adjusted (covariates used were age, sex, ethnicity, smoking, and alcohol consumption) odds ratios were calculated using multivariate logistic regression. Receiver operating characteristic curves and the area under the curve were used to calculate optimal cut points for the whole cohort and for both ethnic groups. Results Increases in all anthropometric measurements resulted in a higher odds ratio for each of the risk factors in both the crude and adjusted models (P<.001). The adjusted odds ratios for dyslipidemia, hypertension, and dysglygemia ranged from 1.30 to 1.35, from 1.36 to 1.52, and from 1.62 to 1.75 (P<.001 for all), respectively, in WEs. The adjusted odds ratio for dyslipidemia, hypertension, and dysglygemia ranged from 1.50 to 1.65 (P<.01), from 1.40 to 1.60 (P<.01), and from 1.96 to 2.11 (P<.001 for all), respectively, in SAs. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for all the anthropometric measurements had low accuracy (P<.70) for the whole cohort and when stratified by ethnicity and sex. Conclusion There is insufficient evidence to recommend replacing body mass index with another anthropometric measurement for the ethnically diverse population in the United Kingdom. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00318032.

Funding

The ADDITION-Leicester study was supported by the Department of Health, the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment Programme (grant reference no. 08/116/300), National Health Service research and development support funding (including the Primary Care Research and Diabetes Research Networks Leicestershire, Northamptonshire and Rutland Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care), and the NIHR Leicester-Loughborough Lifestyle Biomedical Research Unit.

History

Citation

Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 2017, 92(6), pp. 925–933

Author affiliation

/Organisation/COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND PSYCHOLOGY/School of Medicine

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Published in

Mayo Clinic Proceedings

Publisher

Elsevier for Mayo Clinic

issn

0025-6196

eissn

1942-5546

Acceptance date

2017-01-23

Copyright date

2017

Available date

2018-07-01

Publisher version

http://www.mayoclinicproceedings.org/article/S0025-6196(17)30156-8/abstract

Notes

The file associated with this record is embargoed until 12 months after the date of publication. The final published version may be available through the links above. Following the embargo period the above license applies.

Language

en

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    Keywords

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC