Comparison of five diagnostic tests for Giardia duodenalis in fecal samples from young dogs

Abstract

Five diagnostic tests were compared for the diagnosis of Giardia duodenalis in fecal samples of young dogs. Fecal samples were collected from 136 healthy dogs <1year old and examined using immunofluorescence antibody microscopy (IFA) after sucrose gradient centrifugation, zinc sulfate centrifugal flotation technique (ZSCT), SNAP®Giardia test, and ProSpecT®Giardia EZ Microplate assay. In addition, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of the 16S rRNA gene was performed. Kappa (κ) statistic was calculated to assess diagnostic agreement between the IFA and each test. Using the IFA as the gold standard, the relative sensitivity and specificity of each test were determined. Subsequently, a Bayesian approach was used to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of each test in comparison to the IFA results. Giardia duodenalis was detected in 41% of the samples examined by IFA. The ZSCT resulted in 37% of positive samples, with a relative sensitivity and specificity of 86 and 98%, respectively. The SNAP®Giardia test was positive in 40% of the samples, with a relative sensitivity and specificity of 91 and 96%, respectively. The ProSpecT® test was positive in 51% of the samples, with a relative sensitivity and specificity of 100 and 83%, respectively. The relative sensitivity and specificity for PCR were 58 and 56%, respectively, with 55% of samples being PCR-positive. While the sensitivity and specificity estimates of each test in comparison to the IFA changed when using a Bayesian approach, the conclusions remained the same. While the ProSpecT® test was the most sensitive test in this study, it is not designed for dogs and more costly than the other tests. The SNAP®Giardia test performed similar to the ZSCT but may be more favorable because it is fast and easy to perform. Performance of the PCR was poor and the benefit of PCR may be in determining genotypes for evaluating zoonotic transfer between dogs and humans.