Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/131593
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: TeV emission of galactic plane sources with HAWC and H.E.S.S.
Author: Abdalla, H.
Aharonian, F.
Benkhali, F.A.
Anguner, E.O.
Arcaro, C.
Armand, C.
Armstrong, T.
Ashkar, H.
Backes, M.
Baghmanyan, V.
Martins, V.B.
Barnacka, A.
Barnard, M.
Becherini, Y.
Berge, D.
Bernlohr, K.
Bi, B.
Bottcher, M.
Boisson, C.
Bolmont, J.
et al.
Citation: The Astrophysical Journal: an international review of astronomy and astronomical physics, 2021; 917(1):6-1-6-16
Publisher: American Astronomical Society
Issue Date: 2021
ISSN: 0004-637X
1538-4357
Statement of
Responsibility: 
H. Abdalla … S. Einecke … K. Feijen … G. Rowell … et al. (The H.E.S.S. Collaboration and the HAWC Collaboration)
Abstract: The High Altitude Water Cherenkov (HAWC) observatory and the High Energy Stereoscopic System (H.E.S.S.) are two leading instruments in the ground-based very-high-energy γ-ray domain. HAWC employs the water Cherenkov detection (WCD) technique, while H.E.S.S. is an array of Imaging Atmospheric Cherenkov Telescopes (IACTs). The two facilities therefore differ in multiple aspects, including their observation strategy, the size of their field of view, and their angular resolution, leading to different analysis approaches. Until now, it has been unclear if the results of observations by both types of instruments are consistent: several of the recently discovered HAWC sources have been followed up by IACTs, resulting in a confirmed detection only in a minority of cases. With this paper, we go further and try to resolve the tensions between previous results by performing a new analysis of the H.E.S.S. Galactic plane survey data, applying an analysis technique comparable between H.E.S.S. and HAWC. Events above 1 TeV are selected for both data sets, the point-spread function of H.E.S.S. is broadened to approach that of HAWC, and a similar background estimation method is used. This is the first detailed comparison of the Galactic plane observed by both instruments. H.E.S.S. can confirm the γ-ray emission of four HAWC sources among seven previously undetected by IACTs, while the three others have measured fluxes below the sensitivity of the H.E.S.S. data set. Remaining differences in the overall γ-ray flux can be explained by the systematic uncertainties. Therefore, we confirm a consistent view of the γ-ray sky between WCD and IACT techniques.
Rights: © 2021. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/abf64b
Grant ID: ARC
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abf64b
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 8
Physics publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.