Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/3356
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Clinical, psychosocial, and economic effects of antenatal day care for three medical complications of pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial of 395 women
Author: Turnbull, D.
Wilkinson, C.
Gerard, K.
Shanahan, M.
Ryan, P.
Griffith, E.
Kruzins, G.
Stamp, G.
Citation: The Lancet, 2004; 363(9415):1104-1109
Publisher: Lancet Ltd
Issue Date: 2004
ISSN: 0140-6736
1474-547X
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Deborah A Turnbull, Chris Wilkinson, Karen Gerard, Marian Shanahan, Philip Ryan, Elizabeth C Griffith, Gillian Kruzins, Georgina E Stamp
Abstract: <h4>Background</h4>Day care is increasingly being used for complications of pregnancy, but there is little published evidence on its efficacy. We assessed the clinical, psychosocial, and economic effects of day care for three pregnancy complications in a randomised trial of day care versus standard care on an antenatal ward.<h4>Methods</h4>395 women were randomly assigned day (263) or ward (132) care in a ratio of two to one, stratified for major diagnostic categories (non-proteinuric hypertension, proteinuric hypertension, and preterm premature rupture of membranes). The research hypothesis was that for these disorders, as an alternative to admission, antenatal day care will reduce specified interventions and investigations, result in no differences in clinical outcome, lead to greater satisfaction and psychological wellbeing, and be more cost-effective. Data were collected through case-note review, self-report questionnaires (response rates 81.0% or higher) and via the hospital's financial system. Analysis was by intention to treat.<h4>Findings</h4>All participants were included in the analyses. There were no differences between the groups in antenatal tests or investigations or intrapartum interventions. The total duration of antenatal care episodes was shorter in the day-care group than in the ward group (median 17 [IQR 5-9] vs 57 [35-123] h; p=0.001). Overall stay was also significantly shorter in the day-care group (mean 7.22 [SE 0.31] vs 8.53 [0.44]; p=0.014). The median number of care episodes was three (range one to 14) in the day-care group and two (one to nine) in the ward group (p=0.01). There were no statistically or clinically significant differences in maternal or perinatal outcomes. The day-care group reported greater satisfaction, with no evidence of unintended psychosocial sequelae. There was no significant difference in either average cost per patient or average cost per day of care.<h4>Interpretation</h4>Since clinical outcomes and costs are similar, adoption by maternity services of a policy providing specified women with the choice between admission and day-unit care seems appropriate.
Keywords: Humans
Pregnancy Complications
Pre-Eclampsia
Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture
Episode of Care
Hospitalization
Prenatal Care
Choice Behavior
Pregnancy
Adult
Infant, Newborn
Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Health Care Costs
Patient Satisfaction
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
Female
Day Care, Medical
Outcome Assessment, Health Care
Description: Copyright © 2004 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved.
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15893-5
Description (link): http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/31066/description#description
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(04)15893-5
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 6
General Practice publications
Obstetrics and Gynaecology publications
Psychology publications
Public Health publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.