Adelaide Research & Scholarship
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/36428
| Citations | ||
| Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
|---|---|---|
|
?
|
?
|
|
| Type: | Journal article |
| Title: | In my opinion: importance of discussion and criticism |
| Author: | Hutchinson, T. |
| Citation: | Wildlife Society Bulletin: perspectives on wildlife conservation and sustainable use, 2004; 32(1):286-287 |
| Publisher: | Wildlife Soc |
| Issue Date: | 2004 |
| ISSN: | 0091-7648 1938-5463 |
| Statement of Responsibility: | T.P. Hutchinson |
| Abstract: | Krausman et. al (2003) were rather dismissive of the value of published comments on journal articles. I argue that such discussion is important and there should be more of it. The chief reason is the outcome (correction of error) but the process is valuable too. |
| Keywords: | Comments postpublication criticism replies scientific communication |
| Description: | © Wildlife Society |
| DOI: | 10.2193/0091-7648(2004)32[286:IMOIOD]2.0.CO;2 |
| Published version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.2193/0091-7648(2004)32[286:imoiod]2.0.co;2 |
| Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest Centre for Automotive Safety Research publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.