Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/38493
Type: Thesis
Title: Ecological studies of exploited populations of whales and rock lobsters
Author: Chittleborough, Robert Graham
Publisher: Adelaide,
Issue Date: 1978
School/Discipline: Dept. of Zoology
Abstract: The humpback whale and the western rock lobster are widely separated in phylogeny, morphology and physiology. At first sight they have little in common except a marine habitat. Both have a relatively high longevity and when undisturbed appear to attain fairly stable population levels determined by responses to environmental pressures. However, in most other respects their life cycles differ greatly, as shown by the summary in Table 1. Despite these differences, when populations of either species are exploited commercially, a similar rationale is applied to management. Compensatory changes are expected to occur to some extent in birth rate, growth rate, and/or survival as the population is reduced (usually selectively) from some maximal level. Where the interactions of these parameters are optimised giving greatest recruitment to the fishable stock, a fishery can be continued indefinitely at a level classically known as the maximum sustainable yield. Thus in spite of the widest of differences between these species, the responses of their populations to fishing pressure are expected to be similar in principle if not in extent. The research upon humpback whales is brought together in paper 14, while the implications of the findings on the western rock lobster are discussed in paper 26. Following the presentation of research papers, the above hypothesis is examined ln the light of data collected from populations of humpback whales and the western rock lobster as these were exposed to high rates of exploitation.
Dissertation Note: Thesis (D.Sc.)--University of Adelaide, Dept. of Zoology, 1979
Description: 1v. (Various paging) :
Provenance: This electronic version is made publicly available by the University of Adelaide in accordance with its open access policy for student theses. Copyright in this thesis remains with the author. This thesis may incorporate third party material which has been used by the author pursuant to Fair Dealing exceptions. If you are the owner of any included third party copyright material you wish to be removed from this electronic version, please complete the take down form located at http://www.adelaide.edu.au/legals
Appears in Collections:Research Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
Chittleborough1979_DSc.pdf37.43 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.