Adelaide Research & Scholarship
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/98582
| Citations | ||
| Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
|---|---|---|
|
?
|
?
|
|
| Type: | Journal article |
| Title: | A comparison of two methods for estimating 50% of the maximal motor evoked potential |
| Author: | Pitcher, J. Doeltgen, S. Goldsworthy, M. Schneider, L. Vallence, A. Smith, A. Semmler, J. McDonnell, M. Ridding, M. |
| Citation: | Clinical Neurophysiology, 2015; 126(12):2337-2341 |
| Publisher: | Elsevier Ireland |
| Issue Date: | 2015 |
| ISSN: | 1388-2457 1872-8952 |
| Statement of Responsibility: | Julia B. Pitcher, Sebastian H. Doeltgen, Mitchell R. Goldsworthy, Luke A. Schneider, Ann-Maree Vallence, Ashleigh E. Smith, John G. Semmler, Michelle N. McDonnell, Michael C. Ridding |
| Abstract: | Abstract not available |
| Keywords: | Corticomotor stimulus–response curves; Resting motor threshold; Ageing; Children; Motor evoked potential; First dorsal interosseous |
| Rights: | © 2015 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.02.011 |
| Published version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2015.02.011 |
| Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest 3 Paediatrics publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.