Skip to main content

The Status of Quercus pubescens Willd. in Europe

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Geobotany Studies ((GEOBOT))

Abstract

Taxonomic and nomenclatural disagreements are still encountered in the study of Quercus pubescens Willd. in Europe and are discussed here. This includes two current antithetical viewpoints on this taxon, i.e. the acceptance of the huge phenotypic variability among and within its populations within a single species vs. the ranking of these phenotypes as distinct species within the subgenus Quercus (the European white oaks sensu Schwarz).

Up to now many names have been attributed to the European white oaks, especially to the complex included into section Dascia Kotschy sensu Schwarz (the “downy oaks”), revealing contrasting opinions among taxonomists since the very first subdivision of the genus. While some schools in southern Europe still emphasize the distinctness and the species status of many taxa described during the earliest botanical surveys, the current trend is toward rejecting many names and considering them as synonyms.

Our review examines the extremely divergent opinions of specialists on these variations and supports the robustness of the current taxonomical status of Quercus pubescens Willd. as an inclusive taxon.

A plant’s name is the key to its literaturein other words, the key to what we know about it.

(van Steenis 1957)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    According to our interviews from Umbria to Calabria, peasants in C and S Italy apply the term “quercia castagnara”or “cerqua castagnola” not to a particular sort of downy oak but rather to individuals bearing sweet (and often very small) acorns. These individuals used to be and still are preserved as isolated trees in the rural landscape because of their “once tested” valuable acorns. Due to this, they usually attain old age and large dimensions, and give origin to unlikely legends about intentional plantation, cultivation and even deliberate “selection” by local settlers.

  2. 2.

    The German of Schwarz (1937) is extremely intricate, wriggling through long, complicated sentences as easy to follow as a Sumerian epigraph. Few people in the new generations of European scientists outside the German-speaking area can read or simply decipher it. His Latin is also a difficult task for all Europeans today. This means that most modern researchers and scholars rely on the quite poor iconography, which on the other hand is extremely useful for understanding the extraordinary message of Schwarz, i.e. the plesiomorphism across lineages. Even so, it is hardly a reliable reference for clear subdivisions based on leaf form. The text has therefore been and still is ignored, except perhaps for the locations mentioned.

  3. 3.

    The impressive list of synonyms, if critically examined, should also point clearly towards the fuzzy morphological –geographical value of the Schwarz (1937) system. Indeed, a conceptually robust property of his monograph is the natural typological ordination of forms (inherited from Örsted 1866, see Schwarz 1937, p. 10) according to a progression of characters from ancestral to derivative. He considers the “series” as a cline of morphological traits arising from degrees of xeromorphism (leaf outlines, incisions, lobes, hairiness). His classification is functional and considers derivative characters within the series as much as convergence among different series due to environmental constraints. This means that he reviews at the rank of series, all taxa quoted in previous literature in order to emphasize the clinal variation of forms, without any explicit evaluation of “good”or at least not distinct species.

References

  • Aas, G. 1998. Morphologische und ökologische Variation mitteleuropäischer Quercus-Arten: Ein Beitrag zum Verständnis der Biodiversität. Libri Botanici: Band 19. IHW Verlag, Eching, 221 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • AFE 2010. Atlas Florae Europaeae, Database. Committee for Mapping the Flora of Europe. Botanical Museum, Finnish Museum of Natural History PO Box 7 (Unioninkatu 44) FI-00014 Helsinki University, Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albert, C. H., Grassein, F., Schurr, F., Vieilledent, G., & Violle, C. 2011. When and how should intraspecific variability be considered in trait-based plant ecology? Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 13: 217–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. 1949. Introgressive Hybridization. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arend, M., Kuster, T., Günthardt-Goerg, M. S., & Dobbertin, M. 2011. Provenance-specific growth responses to drought and air warming in three European oak species (Quercus robur, Q. petraea and Q. pubescens). Tree Physiology, 31:287–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, M. L. 1997. Natural Hybridization and Evolution. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ascherson, P., & Graebner, P., 1896–1938. Synopsis der Mitteleuropaeischen Flora. 12 vols. Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwat, S. A., & Willis, K. J. 2008. Species persistence in northerly glacial refugia of Europe: a matter of chance or biogeographical traits? Journal of Biogeography, 35:464–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biondi, E., Blasi, C., Burrascano, S., Casavecchia, S., Copiz, R., Del Vico, E., Galdenzi, D., Gigante, D., Lasen, C., Spampinato, G., Venanzoni, R., & Zivkovic, L. 2009 (E. Biondi & C. Blasi, eds.). Manuale italiano di interpretazione degli habitat della Direttiva 92/43/CEE. Ministero dell’ambiente e della tutela del territorio e del mare, società botanica italiana http://vnr.unipg.it:8080/habitat/index.jsp

  • Bisby, F., Roskov, Y., Culham, A., Orrell, T., Nicolson, D., Paglinawan, L., Bailly, N., Appeltans, W., Kirk, P., Bourgoin, T., Baillargeon, G., & Ouvrard, D. (eds.) 2012. Species 2000 & ITIS Catalogue of Life, 2012 Annual Checklist. Digital resource at www.catalogueoflife.org/col/. Species 2000: Reading, UK.

  • Blasi, C. (ed.) 2010. La vegetazione d’Italia. Palombi, Roma. 539 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blasi, C., Facioni, L., Burrascano, S., Del Vico, E., Tilia, A. & Rosati, L. 2012. Submediterranean dry grasslands along the Tyrrhenian sector of central Italy: Synecology, syndynamics and syntaxonomy. Plant Biosystems. DOI: 10.1080/11263504.2012.656729

  • Bohn, U., Gollub, G., & Hettwer, C. 2003. Karte der natürlichen Vegetation Europas; Map of the Natural Vegetation of Europe. Landwirtschaftsverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borhidi, A., 2003. Magyarország nővénytársulásai. Akad Kiado, Budapest. 610 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brullo, S., Guarino, R., & Siracusa, G. 1999. Revisione tassonomica delle querce caducifoglie della Sicilia [Taxonomical revision of the deciduous oaks of Sicily]. Webbia, 54(1):1–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruschi, P. 2010. Geographical variation in morphology of Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. as related to drought stress. Plant Biosystems, 144(2):298–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruschi, P, Vendramin, G. G., Bussotti, F, & Grossoni, P. 2000. Morphological and Molecular Differentiation between Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. and Quercus pubescens Willd. (Fagaceae) in Northern and Central Italy. Annals of Botany, 85:325–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruschi, P., Grossoni, P., & Bussotti, F. 2003. Within- and among-tree variation in leaf morphology of Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. natural populations. TREES, 17:164-172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camus, A. 1936–1954. Les Chênes, Monographie du genre Quercus. 3 vols. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castroviejo, S., Lainz, M., Lopez Gonzalez, G., Montserrat, P., Munoz Garmendia, F., Paiva, J., & Villar, L. (eds.) 1990. Flora Iberica - Plantas vasculares de la Peninsula Iberica e Islas Baleares Vol. II: Platanaceae-Plumbaginaceae. Real Jardin Botanico (C.S.I.C.), Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catalogue of Life, 2011. Annual Checklist, World Checklist of Selected Plant Families (accessed through GBIF data portal, http://data.gbif.org/datasets/resource/1566, 2012-02-12)

  • Cesati, V., Passerini, G., & Gibelli, G. 1867. Compendio della Flora Italiana. 2 vols. Milano.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conti, F., Abbate, G., Alessandrini, A., & Blasi, C., 2005. An annotated Checklist of the Italian Flora. Roma, 420 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, P. H., & Heywood, V. H. 1963. Principles of Angiosperm Taxonomy. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh. xx + 556 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deans, A. R., Yoder, M. J., & Balhoff, J. P., 2012. Time to change how we describe biodiversity. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 27(2):78–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devillers, P., Devillers-Terschuren, J., & Ledant, J.-P. 1991. Habitats of the European Community, CORINE Biotopes manual. Commission of the European Communities, Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrendorfer, F. 1973. Liste der Gefäßpflanzen Mitteleuropas. 2nd ed. Gustav- Fischer-Verlag, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellenberg,H. 1996. Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen. 5th ed. Verlag Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart. 1095pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiori, A. 1923–29. Nuova Flora analitica d’Italia. 2 vols. Firenze.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortini, P., Viscosi, V., Maiuro, L., Fineschi, S., & Vendramin, G. G., 2009. Comparative leaf surface morphology and molecular data of five oaks of subgenus Quercus Oerst. (Fagaceae). Plant Biosystems, 143(3):543–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frattegiani, M., Gigante, D., Maneli, F., & Venanzoni, R., 2010. Applicazione del metodo fitosociologico per la definizione dei criteri gestionali di habitat forestali dell'All. I alla direttiva 92/43/CEE. In: Centenaire de la Phytosociologie (Bensettiti, Bioret, Boullet, Pedrotti, eds.), Braun-Blanquetia, 46:255–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavioli, O. 1935. Archivio Botanico (Forlì), 1(2):16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govaerts, R. 1995. Proposals to conserve or reject three species names in Quercus L. (Fagaceae). Taxon, 44:1195–1197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govaerts, R., & Frodin, D. G., 1998. World Checklist and Bibliography of Fagales (Betulaceae, Corylaceae, Fagaceae and Ticodendraceae), pp 201–394. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govaerts, R. H. A., & Avishai, M. 2000. The conserved type of the name Quercus pubescens Willd. (Fagaceae). Taxon, 49:537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grove, A. T., & Rackham, O. 2001. The nature of Mediterranean Europe. Yale University Press. 524 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvát, I., Glavač V. U., & Ellenberg, H., 1974. Vegetation Südosteuropas. Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntley, B., & Birks, H. J. B., 1983. An atlas of past and present pollen maps for Europe: 0–13 000 years ago. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 667 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntley, B, & Webb III, T (eds.), 1988. Vegetation History. Handbook of Vegetation Science, vol. 7. Kluwer, Dordrecht. 803pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPNI, 2004. The International Plant Names Index Published on the Internet http://www.ipni.org (accessed through GBIF data portal, http://data.gbif.org/datasets/resource/40, 2012-02-12)

  • Jahn, R., & Schönfelder, P., 1995. Exkursionsflora für Kreta. Verlag Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jalas, J., & Suominen, J. (eds.) 1976. Atlas Florae Europaeae. Distribution of Vascular Plants in Europe. 3. Salicaceae to Balanophoraceae. Committee for Mapping the Flora of Europe & Societas Biologica Fennica Vanamo, Helsinki. 128 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jump, A. S., & Penuelas, J., 2005. Running to stand still: adaptation and the response of plants to rapid climate change. Ecology Letters, 8:1010–1020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, S., 2008. Species concepts and floras: what are species for? Biological Journal of the Lineean Society, 95:17–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozlowski, T. T. 1971. Growth and Development of Trees. 2 vols. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepais, O., Petit, R. J., Guichoux, E., Lavabre, J. E., Alberto, F., Kremer, A., & Gerber, S., 2009. Species relative abundance and direction of introgression in oaks. Molecular Ecology, 18:2228–2242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepais, O., Gerber, S., 2011. Reproductive patterns shape introgression dynamics and species succession within the European white oak species complex. Evolution, 65-1:156–170. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01101.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lineaus, C. 1753. Species plantarum, exhibentes plantas rite cognitas, ad genera relatas, cum differentiis specificis, nominibus trivialibus, synonymis selectis, locis natalibus, secundum systema sexuale digestas. Lars Salvius, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loidi, J., & Herrera, M., 1990. The Quercus pubescens and Quercus faginea forests in the Basque Country (Spain): distribution and typology in relation to climatic factors. Vegetatio, 90:81–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meusel, H., Jäger, E. J., Rauschert, S., & Weinert, E., 1978. Vergleichende Chorologie der zentraleuropäischen Flora. Vol. 2, Text and.maps. Gustav-Fischer-Verlag, Jena. 171pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montelucci, G., 1978. Lineamenti della vegetazione del Lazio. Ann. Bot., 35–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicotra, A. B., Atkin, O. K., Bonser, S. P., Davidson, A. M., Finnegan, E. J., Mathesius, U., Poot, P., Purugganan, M. D., Richards, C. L., Valladares, F., & van Kleunen, M., 2010. Plant phenotypic plasticity in a changing climate. Trends in Plant Science, 15:684–992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parr, C. S., Guralnick, R., Cellinese, N., & Roderic, D. M. P., 2012. Evolutionary informatics: unifying knowledge about the diversity of life. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 27(2):94–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petit, R. J., Bodénès, C., Ducousso, A., Roussel, G., & Kremer, A., 2003. Hybridization as a mechanism of invasion in oaks. New Phytologist, 161:151–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pignatti, S, 1998. I boschi d'Italia [The Forests of Italy]. Unione Tipografico-Editrice Torinese, Torino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pignatti, S., 1982. Flora d’Italia. 3 vols. Bologna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieseberg, L. H., 1995. The role of hybridization in evolution: Old wine in new skins. Am. J. Bot., 82(7):944–953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivas-Martínez, S. 1994. Clasificación bioclimática de la Tierra. Folia Botan. Matritense, 13:1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosati, L., Filibeck, G., De Lorenzis, A., Lattanzi, E., Surbera, F., Fascetti, S., & Blasi, C., 2010. La vegetazione forestale dei Monti Alburni, nel Parco Nazionale del Cilento e vallo di Diano (Campania): analisi fitosociologica e significato fitogeografico. Fitosociologia, 47(2):17–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez de Dios, R., Benito-Garzón, M., & Sainz-Ollero, H., 2006. Hybrid zones between two European oaks: a plant community approach. Plant Ecology, 187:109–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, U., 2000. Die Ökologie der Flaumeiche (Quercus pubescens Willd.) und ihrer Hybriden auf Kalkstandorten an ihrer nördlichen Arealgrenze: Untersuchungen zu Boden, Klima und Vegetation. J. Cramer, Gebrüder Borntraeger Verlagsbuchhandlung, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, O., 1937. Monographie der Eichen Europas und des Mittelmeergebiets. Feddes Repert. Sonderbeih. D, 1–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, O. 1964. Quercus L. In: Flora Europaea, vol. 1: Lycopodiaceae to Platanaceae (T. G. Tutin et al., eds.), pp 61–64. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz O., 1993 - Quercus L. In: Tutin T. G., Heywood V. H., Burges N. A., Valentine D. H. Walters S. M., Webb D. A. (Eds.) Flora Europaea, vol. 1: Lycopodiaceae to Platanaceae. - Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 72–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenore, M. 1831. Sylloge Plantarum Vascolarium Florae Neapolitanae hucusque detectarum. Napoli

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenore, M. 1835–1836. Flora Napolitana. 5 vols. Napoli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thuillier, J. L. 1799. Flore des Environs de Paris. 2nd ed. Paris. 502pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trinajstič, I. 1974. Quercus L. In: Analitička flora Jugoslavije (I. Trinajstič, ed.), 1(3):460–481. Institut za botaniku Sveučilišta. Zagreb.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trinajstič, I. 2007. O problemu međusobnog razlikovanja hrastova Quercus pubescens Willd. I Quercus virgiliana (Ten.) Ten. Šumarski list, 131(1–2):57–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tutin, T. G., Heywood, V. H., Burges, N. A., Valentine, D. H., Walters, S. M., & Webb, D. A. (eds.) 1964. Flora Europaea. Vol. 1. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tutin, T. G., Heywood, V. H., Burges, N. A., Moore, D. M., Valentine, D. H., Walters, S. M., & Webb, D. A. (eds.) 1968–1980. Flora Europaea. Vols. 2–5. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tutin, T. G., Burges, N. A., Chater, A. O., Edmondson, J. R., Heywood, V. H., Moore, D. M., Valentine, D. H., Walters, S. M., & Webb, D. A. (eds.) 1993. Flora Europaea, ed. 2, 1. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Steenis, C. G. G. J. 1957. Specific and infraspecific delimitation. Flora Malesiana, ser. 1, 5(3):clxvii-cc xxxix. Jakarta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagenitz, G. (ed.) 1981. Illustrierte Flora von Mitteleuropa. Vol. III, Part 1. 3rd edition. Parey, Hamburg. 504pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, H. 1974. Die Vegetation Osteuropas, Nord- und Zentralasiens. Gustav-Fischer-Verlag, Stuttgart. 452 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, H., & Straka, H. 1970. Arealkunde: Floristisch-Historische Geobotanik. Verlag Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellstein, C., Chelli, S., Campetella, G., Bartha, S., Galiè, M., Spada, F., Canullo, R. 2013. Intraspecific phenotypic variability of plant functional traits in contrasting mountain grassland habitats. Biodiversity and Conservation, 22:2353–2374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellstein, C., & Cianfaglione, K. (in press). Impact of extreme drought and warming on survival and growth characteristics of different provenances of juvenile Quercus pubescens Willd. Folia Geobotanica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zangheri, P. 1976. Flora Italica. CEDAM, Padova.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohary, M. 1973. Geobotanical Foundations of the Middle East. Gustav-Fischer-Verlag, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Gregor Aas (Ecological Botanical Garden, University of Bayreuth, Germany) for fruitful discussions, Javier Loidi (University of the Basque Country, Spain) for informations on oaks in the Iberian peninsula, Andreas Gohlke and Reinhold Stahlmann (University of Bayreuth, Germany) for help with producing the distribution map. C. Wellstein was supported by the Bavarian State Ministry of Sciences, Research and the Arts within the FORKAST project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Camilla Wellstein or Francesco Spada .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wellstein, C., Spada, F. (2015). The Status of Quercus pubescens Willd. in Europe. In: Box, E., Fujiwara, K. (eds) Warm-Temperate Deciduous Forests around the Northern Hemisphere. Geobotany Studies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01261-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics