Skip to main content

Effects of epibiosis on consumer-prey interactions

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Developments in Hydrobiology ((DIHY,volume 121))

Abstract

In many benthic communities predators play a crucial role in the population dynamics of their prey. Surface characteristics of the prey are important for recognition and handling by the predator. Because the establishment of an epibiotic assemblage on the surface of a basibiont species creates a new interface between the epibiotized organism and its environment, we hypothesised that epibiosis should have an impact on consumer-prey interactions. In separate investigations, we assessed how epibionts on macroalgae affected the susceptibility of the latter to herbivory by the urchin Arbacia punctulata and how epibionts on the blue mussel Mytilus edulis affected its susceptibility to predation by the shore crab Carcinus maenas.

Some epibionts strongly affected consumer feeding behavior. When epibionts were more attractive than their host, consumer pressure increased. When epibionts were less attractive than their host or when they were repellent, consumer pressure decreased. In systems that are controlled from the top-down, epibiosis can strongly influence community dynamics. For the Carcinus/Mytilus system that we studied, the insitu distribution of epibionts on mussels reflected the epibiosis-determined preferences of the predator. Both direct and indirect effects are involved in determining these epibiont-prey-consumer interactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Atsatt, P. R. & D. J. O’Dowd, 1976. Plant defense guilds. Science 193: 24–29.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bach, C. E., 1980. Effects of plant diversity and time of colonization on a herbivore—plant interaction. Oecologia 44: 319–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkai, A. & C. McQuaid, 1988. Predator-prey role reversal in a marine benthic ecosystem. Science 242: 62–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. B. & N. Jung, 1979. Selective pressure and coevolution in a kelp canopy community in Southern California. Ecol. Monogr. 493: 335–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J. H. & R. O. Slatyer, 1977. Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organization. Am. Nat. 111: 1119–1144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, G. & M. E. Hay, 1996. Susceptibility to herbivores depends on recent history of both the plant and animal. Ecology 77: 1531 1543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feifarek, B. P., 1987. Spines and epibionts as antipredator defenses in the thorny oyster Spondylus umericanus Hermann. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 105: 39–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gil-Turnes, M. S., M. E. Hay & W. Fenical, 1989. Symbiotic marine bacteria chemically defend crustacean embryos from a pathogenic fungus. Science 246: 116–118.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, M. E., 1986. Associational plant defenses and the maintenance of species diversity: turning competitors into accomplices. Am. Nat. 128: 617–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampert, W. & U. Sommer, 1993. Limnoökologie. Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart, New York, 440 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littler, M. M, P. R. Taylor & D. S. Littler, 1986. Plant defense associations in the marine environment. Coral Reefs 5: 63–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menge, B., 1995. Indirect effects in marine rocky intertidal interac- tion webs: patterns and importance. Ecol. Monogr. 65: 21–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menge, B. & J. P. Sutherland, 1987. Community regulation: variation in disturbance, competition, and predation in relation to environmental stress and recruitment. Am. Nat. 130: 730–757.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfister, C. A. & M. E. Hay, 1988. Associational plant refuges: convergent patterns in marine and terrestrial communities result from differing mechanisms. Oecologia 77: 118–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prescott, R. C., 1990. Sources of predatory mortality in the bay scallop Argopecten irradiance (Lamarck): interactions with seagrass and epibiotic coverage. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 144: 63–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Root, R. B., 1973. Organization of a plant-arthropod association in simple and divers habitats: the fauna of collards (Brassica oleracea). Ecol. Monogr. 431: 95–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryland, J. S., 1976. Physiology and ecology of marine bryozoans. Adv. mar. Biol. 14: 285–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, M. & W. Gnatzy, 1987. Contact chemoreceptors on the walking legs of the shore crab, Carcinus maenas. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1987: 589–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, R. J., 1987. Indirect interactions between prey: apparent competition, predator aggregation, and habitat segregation. Ecology 68: 1887–1897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, U., 1995. An experimental test of the Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis using cultures of marine plankton. Limnol. Oceanogr. 40: 1271–1277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sousa, W. P., 1979. Experimental investigations of disturbance and ecological succesion in a rocky intertidal community. Ecol. Monogr. 49: 227–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Threlkeld, S. T., D. A. Chiavelli & R. L. Willey, 1993. The organization of zooplankton epibiont communities. Trends Ecol. Evol. 8: 317–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahl, M., 1989. Marine epibiosis. 1. Fouling and antifouling: some basic aspects. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 58: 175–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahl, M. (in press). Living attached: aufwuchs, fouling, epibiosis. In Nagabhushanam, R. & M. F. Thompson (eds), Fouling Organisms of the Indian Ocean: Biology and Control Technology. Oxford & IBH Publ. Co. Put Ltd, New Delhi: 31–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahl, M. & M. E. Hay, 1995. Associational resistance and shared doom: effects of epibiosis on herbivory. Oecologia 102: 329–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wootton, J. T., 1993. Indirect effects and habitat use in an intertidal community: interaction chains and interaction modifications. Am. Nat. 141: 71–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer-Faust, R. K., C. M. Finelli, N. D. Pentcheff & D. S. Wethey, 1995. Odor plumes and animal navigation in turbulent water flow: a field study. Biol. Bull. 188: 111–116.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wahl, M., Hay, M.E., Enderlein, P. (1997). Effects of epibiosis on consumer-prey interactions. In: Naumov, A.D., Hummel, H., Sukhotin, A.A., Ryland, J.S. (eds) Interactions and Adaptation Strategies of Marine Organisms. Developments in Hydrobiology, vol 121. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1907-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1907-0_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4988-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1907-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics