Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Experimental and laboratory assessment of clogging potential based on adhesion

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mechanized tunneling through clayey formations is threatened by encountering the clogging problem. Adhesion stress, as the tendency between clay and a metal surface, leads to clogging between TBM and excavated materials. Some empirical clogging classification charts were prepared based on the experienced clogging problems. Moreover, experimental attempts have been made to evaluate clogging potential. The relation between available empirical charts with laboratory measurements has not been fully defined. This research was conducted to clarify the relationship between measured adhesion values and to propose empirical charts to support a laboratory assessment method. In this regard, 35 clayey soil samples (assumed to have different levels of clogging potential) were selected using the main existing empirical evaluation charts. The clayey soil samples were tested at two different consistency indexes using the piston pullout test, as a highly qualified adhesion assessment tool. The performance of available classifications was examined by laboratory test results. For this purpose, distribution of the measured adhesion values and levels of clogging potential with classification charts were compared. Among the examined classification charts, one of them showed a high match with adhesion values. Using the resulting relationship, a new experimental method was proposed to evaluate clogging potential using laboratory data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig.9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ASTM D422–63(2007)e2 (2007) Standard test methods for particle-size analysis of soils. ASTM International, West Conshohocken www.astm.org

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM D4318-10e1 (2010) Standard test methods for liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index of soils. ASTM International, West Conshohocken www.astm.org

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM E691–11 (2011) Standard practice for conducting an Interlaboratory study to determine the precision of a test method. ASTM International, West Conshohocken www.astm.org

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM E2282–13 (2013) Standard guide for defining the test result of a test method. ASTM International, West Conshohocken www.astm.org

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson JH, Fookes PG, Miglio BF, Pettifer JS (2003) Destructuring and disaggregation of Mercia mudstone during full-face tunneling. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 36:293–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhushan B (2003) Adhesion and stiction: mechanisms, measurement techniques, and methods for reduction. J Vac Sci Technol B 21:2262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burbaum U (2009) Adhäsion bindiger Böden an Werkstoffoberflächen von Tunnelvortriebsmaschinen. Technische Universität Darmstadt, September, Institut für Angewandte Geowissenschaften

  • Burbaum U, Sass I (2016) Physics of adhesion of soils to solid surfaces. Bull Eng Geology Environ:1–9. doi:10.1007/s10064- 016-0875-5

  • Burbaum U, Sass I, Breuer B (2010) Verklebungseigenschaften von vera¨nderlich festen Tonsteinen am Beispiel des Stuttgarter Lias & #x03B1. Geotechnik 33(2):175–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinendegen M, Ziegler M, Weh M, Spagnoli G, Stanjek H (2010) A new laboratory test to evaluate the problem of clogging in mechanical tunnel driving with EPB-shields. In: Zhao J, Labiouse V, Dudt J-P, Mathier J-F (eds) Rock mechanics in civil and environmental engineering. Taylor Francis Group, London, pp 429–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinendegen M, Ziegler M, Weh M, Spagnoli G (2011) Clogging during EPB- tunnelling: Occurrence, classification and new manipulation methods. Conference: World Tunnel Congress, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • Fountaine ER (1954) Investigation into the mechanism of soil adhesion. J Soil Sci 2(5):251–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geodata SPA (1995) Review of alternative construction methods and feasibility of proposed methods for constructing Attiko Metro Extension of Line 3 to Egaleo Attiko Metro S.A., Greece

  • Gill DE, Corthesy R, Leite MH (2005) Determining the minimal number of specimens for laboratory testing of rock properties. Eng Geol 78:29–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heuser M, Spagnoli G, Leroy P, Klitzsch N, Stanjek H (2012) Electro-osmotic flow in clays and its potential for reducing clogging in mechanical tunnel driving. Bull Eng Geol Environ 71:721–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollmann FS, Thewes M (2013) Assessment method for clay clogging and disintegration of fines in mechanized tunneling. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 37:96–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollmann F, Thewes M, Weh M (2014) Einflüsse von Verklebungen auf die Materialförderung von Schildvortrieben (Influence of Clogging on the Muck Transport in Shield Machines). Tunnel No. 3, 2014, 10–19

  • Jancsecz S, Krause R, Langmaack L (1999) Advantages of soil conditioning in shield tunneling: Experiences of LRTS Izmir. In: Alten et al (eds) Proceedings of the International Congress on Challenges of the 21st Century. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 865–875

    Google Scholar 

  • Khabbazi Basmenj A, Ghafoori M, Cheshomi A, Azandariani YK (2016a) Adhesion of clay to metal surfaces; normal and tangential measurement. Geomechanics Eng 10:125–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khabbazi Basmenj A, Mirjavan A, Ghafoori M, Cheshomi A (2016b) Assessment of the adhesion potential of kaolinite and montmorillonite using a pull-out test device. Bull Eng Geol Environ 1–9. doi:10.1007/s10064-016-0921-3

  • Khabbazi A, Ghafoori M, Cheshomi A, Karami AY (2014) Design and manufacture of soil-metal adhesion test device and checking repeatability of results. J Iran Assoc Eng Geol, ISSN 2228–5245. (Persian language)

  • Kooistra A, Verhoef PNW, Broere W, Ngan-Tillard DJM, Vantol AF (1999) Appraisal of stickiness of natural clays from laboratory tests. In: Proceedings of the 25th National Symposium of Engineering Geology in the Netherlands

  • Marinos PG, Novack M, Benissi M, Panteliadou M, Papouli D, Stoumpos G, Marinos V, Korkaris K (2008) Ground information and selection of TBM for the Thessaloniki metro. Environmental & Engineering Geoscience XIV(1):17–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messerklinger S, Zumsteg R, Puzrin AM (2011) A new pressurized vane shear apparatus. Geotech Test J 34(2) Paper ID GTJ103175 Available online at: www.astm.org

  • Riek HG (1963) Untersuchungen u¨ber die Adha¨sion zwischen Boden und festen Werkstoffe, Arbeiten der Landwirtschaftlichen Hochschule Hohenheim, Heft 18. Ulmer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Sass I, Burbaum U (2009) A method for assessing adhesion of clays to tunneling machines. Bull Eng Geol Environ 68:27–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schachbasian J (1890) Physik des Bodens: Untersuchungen über die Adhäsion und die Reibung der Bodenarten an Holz und Eisen, Mitteilungen aus dem agrikulturphysikalischen Laboratorium und Versuchsfelde der technischen Hochschule in München, Nr. 13, 193–225, Heidelberg

  • Schlick G (1989) Adhäsion im Boden-Werkzeug-System. Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Maschinenwesen im Baubetrieb, Karlsruhe

    Google Scholar 

  • Spagnoli G, Stanjek H, Fernández-Steeger T, Feinendegen M, Azzam R (2009) Modification of mechanical behavior of clays for improving TBM tunnel driving. In: Proceedings of the Underground Space Seminar/Rock Engineering Seminar, Finnish Tunnelling Association and Finnish National Group of ISRM, 217–224

  • Spagnoli G, Rubinos D, Stanjek H, Fernández Steeger T, Feinendegen M, Azzam R (2011) Undrained shear strength of clays as modified by pH variations. Bull Eng Geol Environ 71:135–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spagnoli G, Feinendegen M, Rubinson D (2012a) Modification of clay adhesion to improve tunnelling excavation. Ground Improvement 166:21–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spagnoli G, Stanjek H, Sridharan A (2012b) Influence of ethanol/ water mixture on the undrained shear strength of pure clays. Bull Eng Geol Environ 71:389–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SubbaRao KS, Allam MM, Robinson RG (2002) Anapparatus for evaluating adhesion between soils and solid surfaces. J Test Eval 30:27–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thewes M (1999) Adhäsion von Tonböden beim Tunnelvortrieb mit Flüssigkeitsschilden, Berichte aus Grundbau und Bodenmechanik der Bergischen Universität Gesamthochschule Wuppertal, Fachbereich Bauingenieurwesen, vol 21. Shaker, Wuppertal

    Google Scholar 

  • Thewes M, Burger W (2004) Clogging risks for TBM drives in clay. Tunnels and Tunnelling International 36:28–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Thewes M, Burger W (2005) Clogging of TBM drives in clayidentification and mitigation of risks. In: Erdem, Solak (eds) Underground space use: analysis of the past and lessons for the future. Taylor and Francis, London 2(737–742)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tong J, Ren L, Chen B, Qaisrant AR (1994) Characteristics of adhesion between soil and solid surfaces. J Terramechanics March 2(31):93–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimnik R, Baalen RW, Verhoef PNW, Broere W, Ngan-Tillard, DJM (2000) The adherence of clay to steel surfaces. In: Proceedings of GeoEng 2000: An International Conference on Geotechnical and Geological Engineering

  • Zumsteg A, Puzrin AM (2012) Stickiness and adhesion of conditioned clay pastes. Tunne Undergr Space Technol 31:86–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Laboratory staff of SCE Institute, Dorin Kashan clay supplying group and Iran Barite clay supplying group was appreciated for support in laboratory tests and soil preparation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Engineering Geology, Faculty of Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

    Amir Khabbazi, Mohammad Ghafoori & Sadegh Tarigh azali

  2. Department of Engineering Geology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

    Akbar Cheshomi

Authors
  1. Amir Khabbazi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mohammad Ghafoori
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sadegh Tarigh azali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Akbar Cheshomi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amir Khabbazi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khabbazi, A., Ghafoori, M., Tarigh azali, S. et al. Experimental and laboratory assessment of clogging potential based on adhesion. Bull Eng Geol Environ 78, 605–616 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-017-1044-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-017-1044-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation