Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Determination of rock type and moisture content in flysch using TLS intensity in the Elerji quarry (south-west Slovenia)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) was performed in tectonically undisturbed flysch in the Elerji quarry (south-west Slovenia), which represents heterogeneous rock mass with alternation of marlstone and sandstone beds. A 9.3-m-thick lithological profile was measured in detail and then compared to TLS values of reflected intensity and mineralogical composition of general marlstones and sandstones. The results showed distinguishable differences between the intensity values of marlstones and sandstones, as these two groups were found to be statistically different. It was also possible to discriminate these units with regard to their moisture content, as different values were observed for combinations of lithology and moisture content. Correlations of intensity and RGB (red, green, blue) values for the mineralogical composition of marlstones and sandstones revealed a good correlation of intensity with combined calcite and quartz content; however, such correlation is valid only for sandstones due to their bigger grain size. Larger quartz grains can scatter the laser beam and lower the correlation. The results showed that acquiring data from heterogeneous rock mass using TLS could be used for the geotechnical engineering classification of distant, inaccessible outcrops and excavated faces, based on the well-established RMR (Rock Mass Rating) and GSI (Geological Strength Index) rock mass classification systems. Both RMR and GSI classification systems classify rock mass based on rock composition, structure and surface conditions of discontinuities. Lithological segmentation of heterogeneous rocks presents, therefore, an important input parameter for their further classification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andriani GF, Parise M (2015) On the applicability of geomechanical models for carbonate rock masses interested by karst processes. Environ Earth Sci 74(12):7813–7821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4596-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andriani GF, Parise M (2017) Applying rock mass classifications to carbonate rocks for engineering purposes with a new approach using the rock engineering system. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 9(2):364–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2016.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton N, Lien R, Lunde J (1974) Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of rock support. Rock Mechanics, 6(4), pp. 189–236

  • Bellian JA, Kerans C, Jennette DC (2005) Digital outcrop models: applications of terrestrial scanning lidar technology in stratigraphic modeling. J Sediment Res 75(2):166–176. https://doi.org/10.2110/jsr.2005.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bieniawski, ZT (1989) Engineering Rock Mass Classifications: A Complete Manual for Engineers and Geologists in Mining, Civil, and Petroleum Engineering, A Wiley-Interscience publication. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA

  • Buckley SJ, Enge HD, Carlsson C et al (2010) Terrestrial laser scanning for use in virtual outcrop geology. Photogrammetric Rec 25(131):225–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9730.2010.00585.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton D, Dunlap DB, Wood LJ et al (2011) Lidar intensity as a remote sensor of rock properties. J Sediment Res 81(5):339–347. https://doi.org/10.2110/jsr.2011.31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campos Inocencio L, Veronez MR, Wohnrath Tognoli FM et al (2014) Spectral pattern classification in Lidar data for rock identification in outcrops. Sci World J 2014:539029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrea D, Abellan A, Humair F et al (2016) Correction of terrestrial LiDAR intensity channel using Oren–Nayar reflectance model: an application to lithological differentiation. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 113(supplement C):17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2015.12.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fekete S, Diederichs M (2013) Integration of three-dimensional laser scanning with discontinuum modelling for stability analysis of tunnels in blocky rockmasses. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 57:11–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2012.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fekete S, Diederichs M, Lato M (2010) Geotechnical and operational applications for 3-dimensional laser scanning in drill and blast tunnels. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 25(5):614–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2010.04.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng Q, Röshoff K (2015) A survey of 3D laser scanning techniques for application to rock mechanics and rock engineering. In: Ulusay R (ed) The ISRM suggested methods for rock characterization, testing and monitoring: 2007–2014. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 265–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07713-0_25

    Google Scholar 

  • Fookes PG (1997) Geology for engineers: the geological model, prediction and performance. Quart J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 30(4):293–424. https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.QJEG.1997.030.P4.02

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franceschi M, Teza G, Preto N et al (2009) Discrimination between marls and limestones using intensity data from terrestrial laser scanner. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 64(6):522–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2009.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heritage G, Large A (2009) Laser scanning for the environmental sciences. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, 288 pp

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Humair F, Abellan A, Carrea D et al (2015) Geological layers detection and characterisation using high resolution 3D point clouds: example of a box-fold in the Swiss Jura Mountains. Eur J Remote Sens 48(1):541–568. https://doi.org/10.5721/EuJRS20154831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus K (2007) Photogrammetry: geometry from images and laser scans. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 459 pp

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lu J, Georghiades AS, Rushmeier H, Dorsey J, Xu C (2005) Synthesis of material drying history: phenomenon modeling, transferring and rendering. In: Proceedings of the first Eurographics conference on natural phenomena (NPH’05). Eurographics Association, Aire-la-Ville, Switzerland, pp 7–16

  • Marinos P, Hoek E (2001) Estimating the geotechnical properties of heterogeneous rock masses such as flysch. Bull Eng Geol Environ 60(2):85–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100640000090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marinos V, Marinos P, Hoek E (2005) The geological strength index: applications and limitations. Bull Eng Geol Environ 64(1):55–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-004-0270-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marinos V, Marinos P, Hoek E (2007) Geological Strength Index (GSI). A characterization tool for assessing engineering properties for rock masses. In: Underground Works under Special Conditions. Proceedings of the ISRM Workshop W1, Madrid, Spain, 6–7 July 2007, pp 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1201/NOE0415450287.ch2

  • Matasci B, Carrea D, Abellan A et al (2015) Geological mapping and fold modeling using Terrestrial Laser Scanning point clouds: application to the Dents-du-Midi limestone massif (Switzerland). Eur J Remote Sens 48(1):569–591. https://doi.org/10.5721/EuJRS20154832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nourani MH, Moghadder MT, Safari M (2017) Classification and assessment of rock mass parameters in Choghart iron mine using P-wave velocity. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 9(2):318–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2016.11.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osgoui RR, Ulusay R, Unal E (2010) An assistant tool for the Geological Strength Index to better characterize poor and very poor rock masses. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci 47(4):690–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2010.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penasa L, Franceschi M, Preto N et al. (2014) Integration of intensity textures and local geometry descriptors from Terrestrial Laser Scanning to map chert in outcrops. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 93:88–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.04.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesci A, Teza G, Ventura G (2008) Remote sensing of volcanic terrains by terrestrial laser scanner: preliminary reflectance and RGB implications for studying Vesuvius crater (Italy). Ann Geophys 51(4):633–653. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-4455

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeifer N, Dorninger P, Haring A et al (2007) Investigating terrestrial laser scanning intensity data: quality and functional relations. In: Proceedings of the 8th conference on Optical 3-D Measurement Techniques, Zurich, Switzerland, July 2007, pp 328–337

  • Pleničar M, Polšak A, Šikić D (1969) Osnovna geoloska karta SFRJ. L 33-88, Trst (Trieste) [kartografsko gradivo], 1:100 000. Beograd: Zvezni geoloski zavod

  • Pleničar M, Polšak A, Šikić D (1973) Tolmac za list Trst: L 33-88: Socialisticna federativna republika Jugoslavija, osnovna geoloska karta, 1:100 000. Beograd: Zvezni geoloski zavod

  • Ranasooriya J (2009) The reliability of rock mass classification systems as underground excavation support design tools. Ph.D. thesis, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia

  • Read SAL, Perrin ND, Richards L (2000) Assessment of New Zealand greywacke rock masses with the Hoek-Brown failure criterion. In: Proceedings of the ISRM International Symposium, Melbourne, Australia, 19–24 November. International Society for Rock Mechanics

  • Riegl LMS GmbH (2011) 3D Terrestrial Laser Scanner Riegl VZ-400: General Description and Data Interfaces

  • Rožič B, Verbovšek T, Vrabec M (2014) Povzetki in ekskurzije/Abstracts and field trips. In: 4. slovenski geološki kongres, Ankaran, 8.-10. oktober 2014. Ljubljana: Naravoslovnotehniska fakulteta

  • Slob S, Hack HRGK, van Knapen B et al (2004) Automated identification and characterisation of discontinuity sets in outcropping rock masses using 3D terrestrial laser scan survey techniques. In: Schubert W (ed) Proceedings of the ISRM regional symposium EUROCK 2004 and 53rd Geomechanics colloquy: rock engineering and practice, Salzburg, Austria, 7–9 October 2004. Verlag Glückauf, Essen, pp 439–443

  • Sturzenegger M (2010) Multi-scale characterization of rock mass discontinuities and rock slope geometry using terrestrial remote sensing techniques. Ph.D. thesis, Simon Fraser University, Canada

  • Telling J, Lyda A, Hartzell P et al (2017) Review of earth science research using terrestrial laser scanning. Earth Sci Rev 169(supplement C):35–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.04.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vöge M, Lato MJ, Diederichs MS (2013) Automated rockmass discontinuity mapping from 3-dimensional surface data. Eng Geol 164:155–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.07.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research for using TLS for lithology logging of thin-bedded heterogeneous rock mass by analysing the intensity values of the reflected laser beam was performed between 2011 and 2016 as part of the Elea iC Research & Development group NTg2 (New Technologies in Geomatics and Geomechanics), which was co-financed by the European Union. The analysis included scanned faces of underground and ground excavations, like tunnel and quarry faces.

The authors express their thanks to Dr. Matej Dolenec for the performance of XRD analysis and DFG Consulting for supporting the performance and knowledge of terrestrial laser scanning.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tina Živec.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Živec, T., Anžur, A. & Verbovšek, T. Determination of rock type and moisture content in flysch using TLS intensity in the Elerji quarry (south-west Slovenia). Bull Eng Geol Environ 78, 1631–1643 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-018-1245-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-018-1245-2

Keywords

Navigation