Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Social multi-criteria evaluation to identify appropriate disaster risk reduction measures: application to landslides in the Rwenzori Mountains, Uganda

  • Thematic Paper
  • Published:
Landslides Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the past decades, the global exposure of persons and assets to natural hazards, like landslides, has increased faster than that their vulnerability has decreased. Therefore, the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) made a call in 2015 for more investment in DRR. Recent studies exposed the lack of scientific evaluation data for selecting DRR measures. The objective of this research is to develop a participatory methodology for identifying appropriate DRR measures based on stakeholder groups’ perceptions. More specifically, we propose a social multi-criteria evaluation which combines a two-phased participatory multi-criteria analysis with an institutional analysis for its design and a discourse analysis for interpreting its outcomes. This method is then tested for a case study focusing on landslides in the Rwenzori Mountains region (Uganda) to illustrate both its relevance and practical challenges. The results from the case study highlight the perceived importance of the acceptability of measures above cost, feasibility and effectiveness criteria, by district and village stakeholder groups. Frequently recommended DRR actions, such as disaster risk zonation or relocation, are shown to be perceived negatively by local stakeholders despite being put forward in national policies. This study contributes to the DRR literature as it proposes a new method to support DRR-related decision-making. It also contributes to the understanding of landslide risk reduction in the Rwenzori Mountains region as it presents the first attempt to identify appropriate landslide risk reduction measures for the region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atukwatse PB, Busiinge C, Tuhaise F, Ahaisibwe F, Tumwine Y, Kaahwa F, Muhumuza M (2012) Stuck in the mist: contextual analysis of the conflicts in the Rwenzori Region. Kabarole Research and Resource Centre (KRC) and Rwenzori Forum for Peace and Justice (RFPJ), Fort Portal

  • Bamutaze Y (2015) Disaster risk governance in ecosystem-dependent livelihoods exposed to multiple natural hazards in Uganda. In: Companion M (ed) Disaster’s impact on livelihood and cultural survival. CRCPress, London, p 19–36

  • Bang HN (2014) General overview of the disaster management framework in Cameroon. Disasters 38:562–586. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bankoff G, Krüger F, Cannon T, Schipper L (2015) Introduction: Exploring the links between cultures and disasters. In: Krüger F (ed) Cultures and disasters: understanding cultural framings in disaster risk reduction. Routledge, London, pp 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Barquet K, Cumiskey L (2017) Using participatory multi-criteria assessments for assessing disaster risk reduction measures. Coast Eng 134:93–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2017.08.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bassett TJ, Fogelman C (2013) Déjà vu or something new? The adaptation concept in the climate change literature. Geoforum 48:42–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.04.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn S (2014) The politics of scale and disaster risk governance: barriers to decentralisation in Portland, Jamaica. Geoforum 52:101–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.12.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon T (2008) Reducing people’s vulnerability to natural hazards communities and resilience. UNU-WIDER, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon T (2015) Disasters, climate change and the significance of “culture,” in: F. Krüger (Ed), Cultures and Disasters: Understanding Cultural Framings in Disaster Risk Reduction. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, London ; New York, pp. 88–106

  • CRED (2015) EMDAT disaster database [WWW Document]. Int. Disaster Database. URL www.emdat.be. Accessed 12 May 2015

  • Davis I, Yanagisawa K, Georgieva K (2015) Disaster risk reduction for economic growth and livelihood: investing in resilience and development. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dodgson J, Spackman M, Pearman A, Phillips L (2009) Multi-criteria analysis: a manual. Communities and Local Government, UK, Wetherby

    Google Scholar 

  • Funtowicz S, Ravetz J (1991) A new scientific methodology for global environmental issues. In: Costanza R (ed) Ecological economics. Columbia, New York, pp 137–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Funtowicz S, Ravetz J (1994) The worth of a songbird: ecological economics as a post-normal science. Ecol Econ 10:197–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furedi F (2007) The changing meaning of disaster. Area 39:482–489. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2007.00764.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard JC, Mercer J (2013) From knowledge to action: Bridging gaps in disaster risk reduction. Progress in Human Geography 37:93–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132512446717

  • Gamper CD, Turcanu C (2009) Can public participation help managing risks from natural hazards? Saf Sci 47:522–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2008.07.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci A (1998) Selections from the prison notebooks. Lawrence & Wishart, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson S (2015) Maps and contradictions: urban political ecology and cartographic expertise in southern Appalachia. Geoforum 60:143–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.01.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herath G (2004) Incorporating community objectives in improved wetland management: the use of the analytic hierarchy process. J Environ Manag 70:263–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2003.12.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt K (2015) Framing disaster in the “global village”: cultures of rationality in risk, security and news. In: Krüger F (ed) Cultures and disasters: understanding cultural framings in disaster risk reduction. Routledge, London, pp 19–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang IB, Keisler J, Linkov I (2011) Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: ten years of applications and trends. Sci Total Environ 409:3578–3594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.06.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Interviewee A (2017) Focus group interview

  • Interviewee B (2017) Focus group interview

  • Jacobs L, Dewitte O, Poesen J, Delvaux D, Thiery W, Kervyn M (2016) The Rwenzori Mountains, a landslide-prone region? Landslides 13:519–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-015-0582-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs L, Dewitte O, Poesen J, Maes J, Mertens K, Sekajugo J, Kervyn M (2017) Landslide characteristics and spatial distribution in the Rwenzori Mountains, Uganda. J Afr Earth Sci 134:917–930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2016.05.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins DH, Harris A, Abu Tair A, Thomas H, Okotel R, Kinuthia J, Mofor L, Quince M (2013) Community-based resilience building: normative meets narrative in Mbale, 2010/2011. Environ Hazards 12:47–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2012.738641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenner B, Titscher S (2000) Methods of text and discourse analysis. SAGE, London ; Thousand Oaks [Calif.]

  • Kaika M (2017) “Don’t call me resilient again!” the new urban agenda as immunology … or what happens when communities refuse to be vaccinated with “smart cities” and indicators. Environ Urban 29:89–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247816684763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kervyn M, Jacobs L, Maes J, Che V, de Hontheim A, Dewitte O, Isabirye M, Sekajugo J, Kabaseke C, Poesen J, Vranken L, Mertens K (2015) Landslide resilience in Equatorial Africa: moving beyond problem identification! Belgeo:1–19. https://doi.org/10.4000/belgeo.15944

  • Knapen A, Kitutu MG, Poesen J, Breugelmans W, Deckers J, Muwanga A (2006) Landslides in a densely populated county at the footslopes of Mount Elgon (Uganda): characteristics and causal factors. Geomorphology 73:149–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.07.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laclau E, Mouffe C (1985) Hegemony and socialist strategy: towards a radical democratic politics. Verso, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim B, Spanger-Siegfried E, Burton I, Malone EL, Huq S (2005) Adaptation policy frameworks for climate change: developing strategies, policies, and measures. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Linstone HA, Turoff M (1975) The Delphi method: techniques and applications. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co., Advanced Book Program, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Maes J, Kervyn M, de Hontheim A, Dewitte O, Jacobs L, Mertens K, Vanmaercke M, Vranken L, Poesen J (2017a) Landslide risk reduction measures: a review of practices and challenges for the tropics. Prog Phys Geogr 41:191–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133316689344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maes J, Poesen J, Parra C, Kabaseke C, Bwambale B, Mertens K, Jacobs L, Dewitte O, Vranken L, de Hontheim A, Kervyn M (2017b) Landslide risk Management in Uganda: a multi-level policy approach. In: Mikos M, Arbanas S, Yin Y, Sassa K (eds) Advancing culture of living with landslides. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 395–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53487-9_46

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Manyena SB, O’Brien G, O’Keefe P, Rose J (2011) Disaster resilience: a bounce back or bounce forward ability? Local Environ 16:417–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mertens K, Jacobs L, Maes J, Kabaseke C, Maertens M, Poesen J, Kervyn M, Vranken L (2016) The direct impact of landslides on household income in tropical regions: a case study from the Rwenzori Mountains in Uganda. Sci Total Environ 550:1032–1043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munda G (2004) Social multi-criteria evaluation: methodological foundations and operational consequences. Eur J Oper Res 158:662–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00369-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nathan F (2008) Risk perception, risk management and vulnerability to landslides in the hill slopes in the city of La Paz, Bolivia. Disasters 32:337−357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0361-3666.2008.01043.x

  • Newman JP, Maier HR, Riddell GA, Zecchin AC, Daniell JE, Schaefer AM, van Delden H, Khazai B, O’Flaherty MJ, Newland CP (2017) Review of literature on decision support systems for natural hazard risk reduction: current status and future research directions. Environ Model Softw 96:378–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.06.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Keefe P, Westgate K, Wisner B (1976) Taking the naturalness out of natural disasters. Nature 260:566–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver-Smith A (2015) Conversations in catastrophe: neoliberalism and the cultural construction of disaster risk. In: Krüger F (ed) Cultures and disasters: understanding cultural framings in disaster risk reduction. Routledge, London, pp 37–52

    Google Scholar 

  • OPMRU (2010) The National Policy for Disaster Preparedness and Management. Office of the Prime Minister, Republic of Uganda, Kampala

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelling M (2007) Learning from others: the scope and challenges for participatory disaster risk assessment. Disasters 31:373–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelling M, Dill K (2010) Disaster politics: tipping points for change in the adaptation of sociopolitical regimes. Progress in Human Geography 34, pp. 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132509105004

  • Pelling M (2011) Adaptation to climate change: from resilience to transformation. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Power DJ (2008) Decision support systems: a historical overview. In: Burstein F, Holsapple C (eds) Handbook on decision support systems 1: Basic Themes. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, pp 121–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-48713-5_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • PreventionWeb (2012) Compilation of National Progress Reports on the implementation of the Hyogo Framework for Action (2009–2011). UNISDR, Geneva

  • Renn O (2015) Stakeholder and public involvement in risk governance. Int J Disaster Risk Sci 6:8–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-015-0037-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renn O, Webler T, Rakel H, Dienel P, Johnson B (1993) Public participation in decision making: a three-step procedure. Policy Sci 26:189–2014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renn O, Klinke A, van Asselt M (2011) Coping with complexity, uncertainty and ambiguity in risk governance: a synthesis. AMBIO 40:231–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-010-0134-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reubens B, Moeremans C, Poesen J, Nyssen J, Tewoldeberhan S, Franzel S, Deckers J, Orwa C, Muys B (2011) Tree species selection for land rehabilitation in Ethiopia: from fragmented knowledge to an integrated multi-criteria decision approach. Agrofor Syst 82:303–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-011-9381-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy B (1996) Multicriteria methodology for decision aiding, nonconvex optimization and its applications. Springer US, Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2500-1

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1990) How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 48:9–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott JC (1998) Seeing like a state: how certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed, Yale agrarian studies. Yale University Press, New Haven

  • Scott A (2011) Focussing in on focus groups: effective participative tools or cheap fixes for land use policy? Land Use Policy 28:684–694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.12.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidney S (1957) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences. J Nerv Ment Disord 125:114–124

  • Smith N, Brown C, Saunders W (2016) Disaster risk management decision-making: review (No. 2016/04), Resilient Organisations Research Report. Resilient Organisations, Auckland, New Zealand

  • UBOS (2013) Statistical Abstract 2013. Uganda Bureau of Statistics, Kampala, Uganda

  • UNESCO (2014) Study on the geo-hazards vulnerability and risk profiles in hot-spot areas as a support to early warning, disaster preparedness and risk reduction (EWDPRR) measures in Uganda

  • UNISDR (2015) Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030. In: A/CONF.224/CRP.1. Presented at the Third World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan, pp 1–25

  • Vaciago G (2013) The safe land compendium of landslide risk mitigation measures. In: Margottini C, Canuti P, Sassa K (eds) landslide science and practice. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, pp 683–689

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • van den Hove S (2006) Between consensus and compromise: acknowledging the negotiation dimension in participatory approaches. Land Use Policy 23:10–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk T (2008) Discourse and power. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, Basingstoke

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vlaeminck P, Maertens M, Isabirye M, Vanderhoydonks F, Poesen J, Deckers S, Vranken L (2016) Coping with landslide risk through preventive resettlement. Designing optimal strategies through choice experiments for the Mount Elgon region, Uganda. Land Use Policy 51:301–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.11.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wamsler C (2006) Mainstreaming risk reduction in urban planning and housing: a challenge for international aid organisations. Disasters 30:151–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts M (1983) On the poverty of theory: natural hazards research in context. In: Interpretations of calamity from the viewpoint of human ecology. Allen & Unwin Inc., Boston, pp 231–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Weichselgartner J, Pigeon P (2015) The role of knowledge in disaster risk reduction. Int J Disaster Risk Sci 6:107–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-015-0052-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wisner B (2016) Vulnerability as a concept, model, metric and tool. ORE NHS. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199389407.013.2

  • Wisner B, Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I (2004) At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters (Second edition). Routledge, London

  • Wodak R, Meyer M (2016) Methods of critical discourse studies, 3rd edn. SAGE, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

    Jan Maes, Kewan Mertens, Liesbet Jacobs, Liesbet Vranken & Jean Poesen

  2. Department of Geography, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium

    Jan Maes & Matthieu Kervyn

  3. School of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences, Mountains of the Moon University, Fort Portal, Uganda

    Bosco Bwambale

  4. Department of Earth Sciences, Royal Museum for Central Africa, Tervuren, Belgium

    Olivier Dewitte

Authors
  1. Jan Maes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kewan Mertens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Liesbet Jacobs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bosco Bwambale
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Liesbet Vranken
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Olivier Dewitte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jean Poesen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Matthieu Kervyn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Maes.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 23 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maes, J., Mertens, K., Jacobs, L. et al. Social multi-criteria evaluation to identify appropriate disaster risk reduction measures: application to landslides in the Rwenzori Mountains, Uganda. Landslides 16, 1793–1807 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-018-1030-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-018-1030-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation