Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction of inter-storey drifts for regular RC structures with masonry infills based on bare frame modelling

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The traditional construction of masonry infills adjacent to RC structural elements is still widely adopted in European countries, including seismically active regions. Given the repeated field observations from damaging earthquakes, pointing to unacceptably high levels of masonry infill damage, the present study is motivated by the need to improve further the European seismic design approach for new RC structures with masonry infills, in order to exclude the poor seismic behaviour probably caused by deficiencies in the verification procedure. Since the in-plane damage to non-structural panels is commonly controlled through the limitation of inter-storey drifts, the possibility to introduce more effective verification criteria, accounting for structural properties, infill layouts and masonry properties is explored. Therefore, starting from the assumption that analyses and verifications in the design of buildings are commonly accomplished neglecting the presence of infills, results of extensive nonlinear numerical analyses for different building configurations are examined. As a result, a simplified procedure for the prediction of expected inter-storey drifts for infilled structures, based on the corresponding demands of bare configurations, in function of a simple parameter accounting for structural properties and the presence of infills, is introduced. Possible implications of the proposed approach aimed at the improvement of the current design provisions are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Chaar G (2002) Evaluating strength and stiffness of unreinforced masonry infill structures, ERDC/CERL TR-02-1 Research Report

  • Asteris PG, Antoniou ST, Sophianopoulos DS, Chrysostomou CZ (2011a) Mathematical macromodeling of infilled frames: state of the art. J Struct Eng 137(12):1508–1517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asteris PG, Chrysostomou CZ, Giannopoulos IP, Smyrou E (2011b) Masonry infilled reinforced concrete frames with openings. In: Proceedings of the COMDYN, III ECCOMAS thematic conference on computational methods in structural dynamics and earthquake engineering, Corfu, Greece

  • Beyer K, Bommer JJ (2007) Selection and scaling of real accelerograms for bi-directional loading: a review of current practice and code provisions. J Earthq Eng 11(S1):13–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braga F, Manfredi V, Masi A, Salvatori A, Vona M (2011) Performance of non-structural elements in RC buildings during the L’Aquila, 2009 earthquake. B Earthq Eng 9(1):307–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvi GM, Bolognini D (2001) Seismic response of RC frames infilled with weakly reinforced masonry panels. J Earthq Eng 5(2):153–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr AJ (2007) Ruaumoko manual. University of Canterbury, Cristchurch

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavaleri L, Di Trapani F (2014) Cyclic response of masonry infilled RC frames: experimental results and simplified modelling. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 65:224–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEN (2002) Eurocode 1-actions on structures, Part 1-1: general actions—densities, self-weight, imposed loads for buildings, EN 1991-1-1. European Committee for Standardisation, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • CEN (2004a) Eurocode 8-design of structures for earthquake resistance, Part 1: generalrules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, EN 1998-1. European Committee for Standardisation, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • CEN (2004b) Eurocode 2-design of concrete structures, Part 1-1: general rules and rules for buildings, EN 1992-1-1. European Committee for Standardisation, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Combescure D, Pires F, Cerqueira P, Pegon P (1996) Test on masonry infilled RC frames and its numerical interpretation. In: Proceedings of the 11th world conference on earthquake engineering, Acapulco, Mexico

  • Crisafulli FJ (1997) Seismic behaviour of reinforced concrete structures with masonry infills. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, New Zealand

  • da Porto F, Guidi G, Dalla Benetta M,Verlato N (2013) Combined in-plane/out-of-plane experimental behaviour of reinforced and strengthened infill masonry walls. In: Proceedings of the 12th Canadian Masonry Symposium, Vancouver, British Columbia

  • Dawe JL, Seah CK (1988) Lateral load resistance of masonry panels in flexible steel frames. In: Proceedings of the 8th international brick and block masonry conference, Dublin, Ireland

  • Decanini LD, Bertoldi SH, Gavarini C (1993) Telai tamponati soggetti ad azione sismica, un modello semplificato: confronto sperimentale e numerico. In: Atti del VI convegno nazionale ANIDIS, Perugia, Italy (in Italian)

  • Decanini LD, Liberatore D, Liberatore L, Sorrentino L (2012) Preliminary Report on the 2012, May 20, emilia earthquake, v.1. http://www.eqclearinghouse.org/2012-05-20-italy-it/

  • Decanini LD, Liberatore L, Mollaioli F (2014) Strength and stiffness reduction factors for infilled frames with openings. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 13(3):437–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fajfar P (1999) Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra. Earthq Eng Struct D 28(9):979–993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fardis MN (2006) Seismic design issues for masonry-infilled RC frames. In: Proceedings of the 1st European conference on earthquake engineering and seismology, Geneva, Switzerland

  • Fardis MN, Panagiotakos T (1997) Seismic design and response of bare and masonry-infilled RC buildings. PART II: infilled Structures. J Earthq Eng 1(3):475–503

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan RD, Bennett RM (1999) Bidirectional behaviour of structural clay tile infilled frames. J Struct Eng 125(3):236–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giberson MF (1967) The response of nonlinear multi-story structures subjected to earthquake excitation, EERL Report. California Institute of Technology, Pasadena

    Google Scholar 

  • Hak S, Morandi P, Magenes G, Sullivan T (2012) Damage control for clay masonry infills in the design of RC frame structures. J Earthq Eng 16(S1):1–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hak S, Morandi P, Magenes G (2013a) Evaluation of infill strut properties based on in-plane cyclic tests. Građevinar 65(6):509–521

    Google Scholar 

  • Hak S, Morandi P, Magenes G (2013b) Damage control of masonry infills in seismic Design. Report EUCENTRE 2013/01. Iuss Press, Pavia

    Google Scholar 

  • Hak S, Morandi P, Magenes G (2013c) Local effects in the seismic design of RC frame structures with masonry infills. In: Proceedings of the 4th ECCOMAS thematic conference on computational methods in structural dynamics and earthquake engineering, Kos, Greece

  • Hermanns L, Fraile A, Alarcón E, Álvarez R (2014) Performance of buildings with masonry infill walls during the 2011 Lorca earthquake. B Earthq Eng 12(5):1977–1997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iervolino I, Galasso C (2009) REXEL 2.31 beta-tutorial. http://www.reluis.it/doc/software/REXEL_Tutorial_ENG.pdf

  • Iervolino I, Maddaloni G, Cosenza E (2008) Eurocode 8 compliant real record sets for seismic analysis of structures. J Earthq Eng 12(1):54–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iervolino I, Galasso C, Cosenza E (2010) REXEL: computer aided record selection for code-based seismic structural analysis. B Earthq Eng 8(2):339–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ioannou I, Borg R, Novelli V, Melo J, Alexander D, Kongar I, Verrucci E, Cahill B, Rossetto T (2012) The 29th May 2012 emilia romagna earthquake, EPICentre Field Observation Report. http://www.eqclearinghouse.org/2012-05-20-italy/reports/

  • Kakaletsis DJ, Karayannis CG (2008) Influence of masonry strength and openings on infilled RC frames under cyclic loading. J Earthq Eng 12(2):197–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koutromanos I, Stavridis A, Shing PB, Willam K (2011) Numerical modeling of masonry-infilled RC frames subjected to seismic loads. Comput Struct 89(11–12):1026–1037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luzi L, Hailemikael S, Bindi D, Pacor F, Mele F, Sabetta F (2008) ITACA (ITalian ACcelerometric Archive): a web portal for the dissemination of italian strong-motion data. Seismol Res Lett 79(5):716–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magenes G, Pampanin S (2004) Seismic reponse of gravity-load design frames with masonry infills. In: Proceedings 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, Canada

  • Magenes G, Bracchi S, Graziotti F, Mandirola M, Manzini CF, Morandi P, Palmieri M, Penna A, Rosti A, Rota M, Tondelli M (2012) Preliminary damage survey to masonry structures after the May 2012 Emilia earthquakes, v.1. http://www.eqclearinghouse.org/2012-05-20-italy/reports/

  • Markulak D, Radić I, Sigmund V (2013) Cyclic testing of single bay steel frames with various types of masonry infill. Eng Struct 51:267–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masi A, Vona M, Mucciarelli M (2011) Selection of natural and synthetic accelerograms for seismic vulnerability studies on reinforced concrete frames. J Struct Eng 137(3):367–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadi M, Akrami V, Mohammadi-Ghazi R (2011) Methods to improve infilled frame ductility. J Struct Eng 137(6):646–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morandi P, Hak S, Magenes G (2011) Comportamento sismico delle tamponature in laterizio in telai in c.a.: definizione dei livelli prestazionali e calibrazione di un modello numerico. In: Atti del XV Convegno ANIDIS-L’ingegneria Sismica in Italia; 18–22 September 2011, Bari, Italy

  • Morandi P, Hak S, Magenes G (2013) Simplified out-of-plane resistance verification for slender clay masonry infills in RC frames. In: Atti del XV Convegno ANIDIS-L’ingegneria Sismica in Italia; 30 Giugno-4 Luglio 2013, Padova, Italy

  • Morandi P, Hak S, Magenes G (2014) In-plane experimental response of strong masonry infills. In: Proceedings of the 9th international masonry conference, Guimarães, Portugal

  • Mosalam KM, Gunay S (2015) Progressive collapse analysis of RC frames with URM infill walls considering in-plane/out-of-plane interaction. Earthq Spectra 31(2):921–943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Negro P, Colombo A (1997) Irregularities induced by non-structural masonry panels in framed buildings. Eng Struct 19(7):576–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NTC08 (2008) Norme tecniche per le costruzioni, D.M. 14 Gennaio 2008, Ministero delle Infrastrutture, S.O. No. 30 alla G.U. del 4.2.2008, No. 29, Rome, Italy (in Italian)

  • Otani S (1981) “Hysteresis models of reinforced concrete for earthquake response analysis. J Fac Eng Univ Tokyo XXXVI(2):125–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacor F, Paolucci R, Luzi L, Sabetta F, Spinelli A, Gorini A, Nicoletti M, Marcucci S, Filippi L, Dolce M (2011) Overview of the Italian strong motion database ITACA 1.0. B Earthq Eng 9(6):1723–1739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preti M, Bettini N, Plizzari G (2012) Infill walls with sliding joints to limit infill-frame seismic interaction: large-scale experimental test. J Earthq Eng 16(1):125–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preti M, Migliorati L, Giuriani E (2015) Experimental testing of engineered masonry infill walls for post-earthquake structural damage control. B Earthq Eng 13(7):2029–2049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priestley MJN, Calvi GM, Kowalsky MJ (2007) Displacement-based seismic design of structures. IUSS Press, Pavia

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricci P, Manfredi V, De Luca F, Verderame GM (2011) 6th April 2009 L’Aquila earthquake, Italy: reinforced concrete building performance. B Earthq Eng 9(1):285–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues H, Varum H, Costa A (2010) Simplified macro-model for infill masonry panels. J Earthq Eng 14(3):390–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shing PB, Mehrabi AB (2002) Behaviour and analysis of masonry-infilled frames. Progr Struct Eng Mater 4:320–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smyrou E, Blandon C, Antoniou S, Pinho R, Crisafulli FJ (2011) Implementation and verification of a masonry panel model for nonlinear dynamic analysis of infilled RC frames. B Earthq Eng 9(5):1519–1534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stavridis A, Koutromanos I, Shing PB (2012) Shake-table tests of a three-story reinforced concrete frame with masonry infill walls. Earthq Eng Struct D 41(6):1089–1108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan TJ, Priestley MJN, Calvi GM (2006) Seismic design of frame-wall structures, Research Report ROSE-2006/02. IUSS Press, Pavia

    Google Scholar 

  • Vicente R, Rodrigues H, Costa A, Varum H, Mendes da Silva JAR (2012) Performance of masonry enclosure walls: lessons learned from recent earthquakes. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 11(1):23–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work, conducted at the University of Pavia and at Eucentre of Pavia in Italy, was funded by the ANDIL Assolaterizi and through the Executive Project DPC-RELUIS 2010–2013 and DPC-RELUIS 2014–2016. The financial support received is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanja Hak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hak, S., Morandi, P. & Magenes, G. Prediction of inter-storey drifts for regular RC structures with masonry infills based on bare frame modelling. Bull Earthquake Eng 16, 397–425 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0210-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0210-y

Keywords

Navigation