Skip to main content
Log in

Openings in infills with horizontal sliding joints: a parametric study to support the design

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present paper a numerical study is reported, aimed at investigating the role of openings in the in-plane response of infilled RC frames when masonry infills with sliding sub-panels are adopted. Such innovative infills are meant to reduce post-earthquake damage and infill-frame interaction, with respect to traditional solid masonry infills. Their study was carried out mainly on the fully infilled configuration, and limited information is available about its response in presence of an opening. In the paper focus is made on the interaction of the infill with both the surrounding frame and with the specific post placed at the opening side, which is essential to confine the infill and protect the opening fixtures. The adopted numerical model is calibrated on the experimental results of a test performed on a real scale infill wall with horizontal sliding joints and a full-height opening on a side. A parametric study is carried out to investigate the influence of different design parameters. In detail, the focus is placed on the stiffness of the post and on the geometry of the infill (in terms of position of the opening, infill length and sliding joint configurations). The obtained results show the beneficial effect of the post deformability in reducing the infill-frame interaction, with a significant reduction of the shear action exerted on the frame columns and on the post itself. Moreover, the obtained results allowed to define some preliminary recommendations for the design of the infill and of the post at the opening side.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Chaar G, Lamb GE, Issa MA (2003) Effect of openings on structural performance of unreinforced masonry infilled frames. ACI Spec Publ 211:247–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asteris PG (2012) Modeling of infilled frames with openings. Open Constr Build Technol J 6:81–91. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874836801206010081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Augenti N, Parisi F (2010) Learning from construction failures due to the 2009 L’Aquila, Italy, earthquake. J Perform Constr Facil 24:536–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basha SH, Kaushik HB (2016) Behavior and failure mechanisms of masonry-infilled RC frames (in low-rise buildings) subject to lateral loading. Eng Struct 111:233–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.12.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolis V, Stavridis A, Preti M (2017) Numerical investigation of the in-plane performance of masonry-infilled RC frames with sliding subpanels. J Struct Eng 143:04016168. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braga F, Manfredi V, Masi A, Salvatori A, Vona M (2011) Performance of non-structural elements in RC buildings during the L’Aquila, 2009 earthquake. Bull Earthq Eng 9:307–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-010-9205-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvi GM, Bolognini D (2001) Seismic response of reinforced concrete frames infilled with weakly reinforced masonry panels. J Earth Eng 05:153–185. https://doi.org/10.1142/S136324690100039X

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavaleri L, Di Trapani F, Asteris PG, Sarhosis V (2017) Influence of column shear failure on pushover based assessment of masonry infilled reinforced concrete framed structures: a case study. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 100:98–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.05.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chrysostomou CZ, Asteris PG (2012) On the in-plane properties and capacities of infilled frames. Eng Struct 41:385–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.03.057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Ludovico M, Prota A, Moroni C, Manfredi G, Dolce M (2017) Reconstruction process of damaged residential buildings outside historical centres after the L’Aquila earthquake: part II—“heavy damage” reconstruction. Bull Earthq Eng 15:693–729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9979-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Trapani F, Malavisi M (2018) Seismic fragility assessment of infilled frames subject to mainshock/aftershock sequences using a double incremental dynamic analysis approach. Bull Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0445-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolšek M, Fajfar P (2008) The effect of masonry infills on the seismic response of a four-storey reinforced concrete frame—a deterministic assessment. Eng Struct 30:1991–2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EERI (Earthquake Engineering Research Institute) (2000) Kocaeli, Turkey, earthquake of August 17, 1999: Reconnaissance report. Earthquake Spectra, Oakland, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • EERI (Earthquake Engineering Research Institute) (2009) The MW 6.3 Abruzzo, Italy, Earthquake of April 6, 2009, EERI Special Earthquake Report

  • Gao X, Stavridis A, Bolis V, Preti M (2018) Experimental study on the seismic performance of non-ductile RC frames infilled with sliding subpanels. In: Proceedings of eleventh U.S. national conference on earthquake engineering integrating science, engineering and policy. Presented at the eleventh U.S. national conference on earthquake engineering integrating science, engineering and policy June 25–29, 2018, Los Angeles, California, p 12

  • Markulak D, Radić I, Sigmund V (2013) Cyclic testing of single bay steel frames with various types of masonry infill. Eng Struct 51:267–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.01.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabi Armin B, Benson Shing P, Schuller Michael P, Noland James L (1996) Experimental evaluation of masonry-infilled RC frames. J Struct Eng 122:228–237. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:3(228)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milanesi RR, Morandi P, Magenes G (2018) Local effects on RC frames induced by AAC masonry infills through FEM simulation of in-plane tests. Bull Earthq Eng 16:4053–4080. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0353-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misir IS (2015) Potential use of locked brick infill walls to decrease soft-story formation in frame buildings. J Perform Constr Facil. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000633

    Google Scholar 

  • Morandi P, Milanesi RR, Magenes G (2018) Innovative solution for seismic-resistant masonry infills with sliding joints: in-plane experimental performance. Eng Struct 176:719–733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.09.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NTC (2008) Norme tecniche per le costruzioni. D.M. Ministero Infrastrutture e Trasporti 14 gennaio 2008, G.U.R.I. 4 Febbraio 2008, Roma (in Italian)

  • Preti M, Bolis V (2017) Seismic analysis of a multi-story RC frame with infills partitioned by sliding joints. Ingengeria Sismica 34:175–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Preti M, Bettini N, Plizzari G (2012) Infill walls with sliding joints to limit infill-frame seismic interaction: large-scale experimental test. J Earthq Eng 16:125–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2011.579815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preti M, Migliorati L, Giuriani E (2015) Experimental testing of engineered masonry infill walls for post-earthquake structural damage control. Bull Earthq Eng 13:2029–2049. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9701-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preti M, Bettini N, Migliorati L, Bolis V, Stavridis A, Plizzari GA (2016) Analysis of the in-plane response of earthen masonry infill panels partitioned by sliding joints. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 45:1209–1232. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preti M, Bolis V, Stavridis A (2017) Seismic infill–frame interaction of masonry walls partitioned with horizontal sliding joints: analysis and simplified modeling. J Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2017.1387195

    Google Scholar 

  • Preti M, Neffati M, Bolis V (2018) Earthen masonry infill walls: use of wooden boards as sliding joints for seismic resistance. Constr Build Mater 184:100–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preti M, Bolis V, Paderno A (2019) Infill with sliding panels and a full-height opening. In: Fragiadakis M, Papadrakakis M (eds) Proceedings of COMPDYN 2019, 7th ECCOMAS, Crete, Greece, 24–26 June 2019

  • Shing PB, Stavridis A, Koutromanos I, Willam K, Blackard B, Kyriakides MA, Billington SL, Arnold S (2009) Seismic performance of non-ductile RC frames with brick infill. In: Improving the seismic performance of existing buildings and other structures. Presented at the ATC and SEI conference on improving the seismic performance of existing buildings and other structures, American Society of Civil Engineers, San Francisco, California, United States, pp 1117–1128. https://doi.org/10.1061/41084(364)102

  • Sigmund V, Penava D (2014) Influence of openings, with and without confinement, on cyclic response of infilled R-C frames—an experimental study. J Earthq Eng 18:113–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2013.817362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stavridis A, Shing PB (2010) Finite-element modeling of nonlinear behavior of masonry-infilled RC frames. J Struct Eng 136:285–296. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Surendran S (2012) Masonry infill RC frames with openings: review of in-plane lateral load behaviour and modeling approaches. Open Constr Build Technol J 6:126–154. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874836801206010126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tasligedik AS, Pampanin S (2017) Rocking cantilever clay brick infill wall panels: a novel low damage infill wall system. J Earthq Eng 21:1023–1049. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2016.1190797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor RL (2007) FEAP—A finite element analysis program—Version 8.1, Univ. of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, Calif

  • Tsantilis AV, Triantafillou TC (2018) Innovative seismic isolation of masonry infills using cellular materials at the interface with the surrounding RC frames. Eng Struct 155:279–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.11.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vailati M, Monti G (2016) Earthquake-resistant and thermo-insulating infill panel with recycled-plastic joints. In: D’Amic S (ed) Earthquakes and their impact on society, Springer Natural Hazards. Springer, Berlin, pp 417–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21753-6_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Varum H, Furtado A, Rodrigues H, Dias-Oliveira J, Vila-Pouca N, Arêde A (2016) Seismic performance of the infill masonry walls and ambient vibration tests after the Ghorka 2015, Nepal earthquake. Bull Earthquake Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9999-z

    Google Scholar 

  • Verlato N, Guidi G, Da Porto F, Modena C (2016) Innovative systems for masonry infill walls based on the use of deformable joints: combined in-plane/out-of-plane tests. In: Presented at the Brick and Block Masonry: Trends, Innovations and Challenges—Proceedings of the 16th International Brick and Block Masonry Conference, IBMAC 2016, pp 1359–1366

Download references

Acknowledgements

The presented study was achieved within the research program funded by the “Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri, Dipartimento della Protezione Civile”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Bolis.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bolis, V., Preti, M. Openings in infills with horizontal sliding joints: a parametric study to support the design. Bull Earthquake Eng 17, 5101–5132 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00654-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00654-9

Keywords

Navigation