Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Revisiting port system delineation through an analysis of maritime interdependencies among seaports

  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A port system is a system of two or more ports, located in proximity within a given area. In literature, various geographical and functional scales have been identified ranging from complete coastlines to the notions of a ‘range’ and a ‘multi-port gateway region’. Not only does the spatial scale create confusion on the true functional delineation of port systems, but it also complicates a clear understanding of the relational mechanisms at stake within these port systems. This paper revisits existing approaches to and empirical delineations of port systems. Maritime network analysis techniques are deployed to understand hierarchies and interdependencies among nodes of container port systems and sub-systems in North Europe and Northeast Asia. The results provide additional insights on how ports interact from a maritime services’ perspectives and demonstrate whether or not ports which are traditionally considered as belonging to the same port system can in reality be considered forming a fully integrated port system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beresford, A., & Pettit, S. (2009). A geographical perspective on port performance in the United Kingdom. In T. Notteboom, C. Ducruet, & P. de Langen (Eds.), Ports in proximity: Competition and coordination among adjacent seaports, transport and mobility series (pp. 209–224). Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J. L., Lambiotte, R., & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 10, P10008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blondel V. D., Krings G. M., & Thomas I. (2012). Regions and borders of mobile telephony in Belgium and around Brussels. Brussels Studies No. 42.

  • Brooks, M. R., Cullinane, K. P., & Pallis, A. A. (2017). Revisiting port governance and port reform: A multi-country examination. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 100(22), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charlier, J. J. (1988). Structural change in the Belgian port system, 1980–1986. Maritime Policy & Management, 15(4), 315–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comtois, C., & Dong, J. (2007). Port competition in the Yangtze River delta. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 48(3), 299–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullinane, K. P. B., & Khanna, M. (2000). Economies of scale in large containerships: optimal size and geographical implications. Journal of Transport Geography, 8(3), 181–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Langen, P. W., Van Meijeren, J., & Tavasszy, L. A. (2012) Combining Models and Commodity Chain Research for Making Long-Term Projections of Port Throughput: an Application to the Hamburg–Le Havre Range. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 12(3), 310–331.

  • Ducruet, C. (2020). The geography of maritime networks: A critical review. Journal of Transport Geography, 88, 102824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ducruet, C., & Berli, J. (2018). Mapping the globe. The patterns of mega-ships. Port Technology International, 77, 94–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ducruet, C., Cuyala, S., & El Hosni, A. (2018). Maritime networks as systems of cities: the long-term interdependencies between global shipping flows and urban development (1890–2010). Journal of Transport Geography, 66, 340–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ducruet, C., Lee, S. W., & Ng, A. K. Y. (2010a). Centrality and vulnerability in liner shipping networks: Revisiting the Northeast Asian port hierarchy. Maritime Policy and Management, 37(1), 17–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ducruet, C., & Notteboom, T. E. (2012). The worldwide maritime network of container shipping: Spatial structure and regional dynamics. Global Networks, 12(3), 395–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ducruet, C., Notteboom, T. E., & De Langen, P. W. (2009a). Revisiting inter-port relationships under the New Economic Geography research framework. In T. E. Notteboom, C. Ducruet, & P. W. De Langen (Eds.), Ports in proximity: Competition and cooperation among adjacent seaports (pp. 11–27). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ducruet, C., Roussin, S., & Jo, J. C. (2009b). Going West? Spatial polarization of the North Korean port system. Journal of Transport Geography, 17(5), 357–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ducruet, C., Rozenblat, C., & Zaidi, F. (2010b). Ports in multi-level maritime networks: Evidence from the Atlantic (1996–2006). Journal of Transport Geography, 18(4), 508–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ducruet, C., & Wang, L. (2018). China’s global shipping connectivity: Internal and external dynamics in the contemporary era (1890–2016). Chinese Geographical Science, 28(2), 202–2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Comission (2017) Case M.8459—TIL/PSA/PSA DGD (Antwerp).

  • European Commission (2001) Case No COMP/JV.56—HUTCHISON/ECT (Rotterdam).

  • Feng, L., & Notteboom, T. (2013). Peripheral challenge by small and medium sized ports (SMPs) in multi-port gateway regions: The case study of northeast of China. Polish Maritime Research, 20(79), 55–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freire Seoane, M. J., Gonzalez-Laxe, F., & Montes, C. P. (2013). Foreland determination for containership and general cargo ports in Europe (2007–2011). Journal of Transport Geography, 30, 56–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Alonso, L., & Sanchez-Soriano, J. (2009). Port selection from a hinterland perspective. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 11(3), 260–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ge, J., Zhu, M., Sha, M., Notteboom, T., Shi, W., & Wang, X. (2019). Towards 25,000 TEU vessels? A comparative economic analysis of ultra-large containership sizes under different market and operational conditions. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-019-00136-4

  • Gottmann, J. (1961). Megalopolis: The Urbanized Northeastern Seaboard of the United States. New York: The Twentieth Century Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haezendonck, E., Coeck, C., & Verbeke, A. (2000). The competitive position of seaports: Introduction of the value added concept. International Journal of Maritime Economics, 2(2), 107–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Y., & Zhu, D. (2009). Empirical analysis of the worldwide maritime transportation network. Physica A, 388(10), 2061–2071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaluza, P., Kölzsch, A., Gastner, M. T., & Blasius, B. (2010). The complex network of global cargo ship movements. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 7(48), 1093–1103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, J. S. L., & Notteboom, T. (2014). The greening of ports: A comparison of port management tools used by leading ports in Asia and Europe. Transport Reviews, 34(2), 169–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, J. S. L., & Yap, W. Y. (2011). Dynamics of liner shipping network and port connectivity in supply chain systems: Analysis on East Asia. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(6), 1272–1281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemarchand, A., & Joly, O. (2009). Regional integration and maritime range. In T. E. Notteboom, C. Ducruet, & P. W. De Langen (Eds.), Ports in proximity: Competition and coordination among adjacent seaports (pp. 87–99). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Z., Xu, M., & Shi, Y. (2015). Centrality in global shipping network basing on worldwide shipping areas. GeoJournal, 80(1), 47–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, L., Wang, K. Y., & Yip, T. L. (2013). Development of a container port system in Pearl River Delta: Path to multi-gateway ports. Journal of Transport Geography, 28, 30–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C., Wang, J., Zhang, H., & Yin, M. (2018). Mapping the hierarchical structure of the global shipping network by weighted ego network analysis. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 10(1), 63–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Low, J. M., & Tang, L. C. (2012). Network effects in the East Asia container ports industry. Maritime Policy & Management, 39(4), 369–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marasco, A., & Romano, A. (2018). Inter-port interactions in the Le Havre–Hamburg range: A scenario analysis using a nonautonomous Lotka Volterra model. Journal of Transport Geography, 69, 207–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mareï, N., & Ducruet, C. (2015). The regionalization of maritime networks: Evidence from a comparative analysis of maritime basins. In C. Ducruet (Ed.), Maritime networks: Spatial structures and time dynamics, Routledge studies in transport analysis (pp. 330–350). Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meersman, H., Sys, C., Van de Voorde, E., & Vanelslander, T. (2016). Road pricing and port hinterland competitiveness: An application to the Hamburg–Le Havre range. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 10(3), 170–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merk, O. (2013). The competitiveness of global port-cities: synthesis report. OECD regional development working papers, no. 2013/13, OECD, Paris, 183 p.

  • Merkel, A. (2017). Spatial competition and complementarity in European port regions. Journal of Transport Geography, 61, 40–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NEA. (2010). Ports and their connections within the TEN-T: Stakeholder consultation report, Reference R20100151/31126000/SNE/HBA, Zoetermeer, June 2010.

  • Ng, A. K. Y., & Ducruet, C. (2014). The changing tides of port geography (1950–2012). Progress in Human Geography, 38(6), 785–823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, A. K., Ducruet, C., Jacobs, W., Monios, J., Notteboom, T., Rodrigue, J. P., et al. (2014). Port geography at the crossroads with human geography: Between flows and spaces. Journal of Transport Geography, 41, 84–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notteboom, T. (1997). Concentration and load centre development in the European container port system. Journal of Transport Geography, 5(2), 99–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notteboom, T. (2006a). Traffic inequality in seaport systems revisited. Journal of Transport Geography, 14(2), 95–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notteboom, T. (2006b). Container throughput dynamics in the East Asian container port system. Journal of International Logistics and Trade, 4(1), 31–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notteboom, T. (2007). Spatial dynamics in the container load centers of the Le Havre–Hamburg range. Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie, 51(1), 108–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notteboom, T. (2009a). Economic analysis of the European seaport system. Report for European Sea ports Organisation (ESPO), ITMMA–University of Antwerp: Antwerp.

  • Notteboom, T. (2009b). Complementarity and substitutability among adjacent gateway ports. Environment and Planning A, 41(3), 743–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notteboom, T. (2010). Concentration and the formation of multi-port gateway regions in the European container port system: an update. Journal of Transport Geography, 18(4), 567–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notteboom, T., & de Langen, P. W. (2015). Container port competition in Europe. In Handbook of ocean container transport logistics (pp. 75–95). Springer.

  • Notteboom, T., Parola, F., Satta, G., & Pallis, A. A. (2017). The relationship between port choice and terminal involvement of alliance members in container shipping. Journal of Transport Geography, 64, 158–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notteboom, T. E., & Rodrigue, J. P. (2005). Port regionalization: Towards a new phase in port development. Maritime Policy and Management, 32(3), 297–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notteboom, T., & Yang, Z. (2017). Port governance in China since 2004: Institutional layering and the growing impact of broader policies. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 22, 184–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nystuen, J. D., & Dacey, M. F. (1961). A graph theory interpretation of nodal regions. Papers in Regional Science, 7(1), 29–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plasschaert K., Derudder B., Dullaert W., & Witlox F. (2011). Redefining the Hamburg–Le Havre range in maritime networks. In Proceedings of the BIVE-GIBET transport research day 2011 (pp. 240–244), Zelzate, University Press.

  • Rashed, Y., Meersman, H., Sys, C., Van de Voorde, E., & Vanelslander, T. (2018). A combined approach to forecast container throughput demand: Scenarios for the Hamburg–Le Havre range of ports. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 117, 127–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimmer, P. J. (1967). The changing status of New Zealand seaports, 1853–1960. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 57(1), 88–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson R. (1968). Spatial structuring of port-linked flows: The port of Vancouver, Canada, 1965. Ph.D. Dissertation in Geography, University of British Columbia.

  • Robinson, R. (1998). Asian hub/feeder nets: The dynamics of restructuring. Maritime Policy and Management, 25(1), 21–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigue, J. P. (1996). Transportation corridors in Pacific Asian urban regions. In Proceedings of the 7th world conference on transport research, Sydney: Pergamon.

  • Rodrigue, J. P., & Notteboom, T. E. (2010). Foreland-based regionalization: Integrating intermediate hubs with port hinterlands. Research in Transportation Economics, 27(1), 19–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shinohara, M. (2009). Port competition paradigms and Japanese port clusters. In T. Notteboom, C. Ducruet, & P. de Langen (Eds.), Ports in proximity: Competition and coordination among adjacent seaports, transport and mobility series (pp. 263–272). Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slack, B., & Wang, J. J. (2002). The challenge of peripheral ports: An Asian perspective. GeoJournal, 56(2), 159–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, D. W., & Yeo, K. T. (2004). A competitive analysis of Chinese container ports using the analytic hierarchy process. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 6(1), 34–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soppé, M., & Frémont, A. (2007). Northern European range: Shipping line concentration and port hierarchy. In J. Wang, D. Olivier, T. Notteboom, & B. Slack (Eds.), Ports, cities, and global supply chains (pp. 105–120). Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taaffe, E. J., Morrill, R. L., & Gould, P. R. (1963). Transport expansion in underdevelopped countries: a comparative analysis. Geographical Review, 53, 503–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorez, P., & Joly, O. (2006). Port Competition in the Northern Range from Le Havre to Hamburg. Promet-Traffic & Transportation, 18(2), 77–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tran, N. K., & Haasis, H. D. (2014). Empirical analysis of the container liner shipping network on the East-West corridor (1995–2011). Netnomics, 15(3), 121–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trotta, M. (2000). Mediterranean and northern terminals: How is the competition developing? International Journal of Maritime Economics, 2(4), 351–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unicredit. (2010). Maritime Trend Barometer, Hamburg, February 2010.

  • Van Klink, H. A. (1995). Towards the borderless mainport Rotterdam: An analysis of functional, spatial and administrative dynamics in port systems, Ph.D. Thesis, Erasmus University Rotterdam, No. 104.

  • Veldman, S. J., & Bückmann, E. H. (2003). A model on container port competition: An application for the West European container hub-ports. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 5(1), 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vigarié, A. (1964). Les grands ports de commerce de la Seine au Rhin. Leur evolution devant l’industrialisation des arrière-pays. Paris: SABRI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., & Cullinane, K. (2008). Measuring container port accessibility: An application of the Principal Eigenvector Method (PEM). Maritime Economics and Logistics, 10, 75–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., & Cullinane, K. (2014). Traffic consolidation in East Asian container ports: A network flow analysis. Transportation Research Part A, 61, 152–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C., & Ducruet, C. (2012). New port development and global city making: Emergence of the Shanghai-Yangshan multilayered gateway hub. Journal of Transport Geography, 25, 58–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C., & Ducruet, C. (2013). Regional resilience and spatial cycles: Long-term evolution of the Chinese port system (221BC-2010AD). Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 104(5), 521–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J. J., & Ng, A. K. Y. (2011). The geographical connectedness of Chinese seaports with foreland markets: A new trend? Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 102(2), 188–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., Notteboom, T., Lau, Y. Y., & Ng, A. K. (2017). Functional differentiation and sustainability: A new stage of development in the Chinese container port system. Sustainability, 9(3), 328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J. J., & Slack, B. (2000). The evolution of a regional container port system: The Pearl River Delta. Journal of Transport Geography, 8(4), 263–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C., & Wang, J. (2011). Spatial pattern of the global shipping network and its hub-and-spoke system. Research in Transportation Economics, 32(1), 54–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiegmans, B., & Dekker, S. (2016). Benchmarking deep-sea port performance in the Hamburg-Le Havre range. Benchmarking: An International Journal.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, M., Li, Z., Shi, Y., Zhang, X., & Jiang, S. (2015). Evolution of regional inequality in the global shipping network. Journal of Transport Geography, 44, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yanbing, Y., Zhongzhen, Y., Zan, Y., & Zhi, Z. (2005). Evaluation of competition ability and market share for container port. Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 5, 2483–2493.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP/2007–2013)/ERC Grant Agreement No. [313847] “World Seastems”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS), UMR 8504 Géographie-cités, Aubervilliers, France

    César Ducruet

  2. Maritime Institute, Faculty of Law and Criminology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

    Theo E. Notteboom

  3. Faculty of Applied Economics, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium

    Theo E. Notteboom

  4. Antwerp Maritime Academy, Antwerp, Belgium

    Theo E. Notteboom

Authors
  1. César Ducruet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Theo E. Notteboom
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to César Ducruet.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

The research does not involve human participants or animals.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ducruet, C., Notteboom, T.E. Revisiting port system delineation through an analysis of maritime interdependencies among seaports. GeoJournal 87, 1831–1859 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10341-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10341-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation