Skip to main content
Log in

Reproductive traits explain contrasting ecological features in sponges: the sympatric poecilosclerids Hemimycale columella and Crella elegans as examples

  • SPONGE RESEARCH DEVELOPMENTS
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our study focused on the Mediterranean species Hemimycale columella and Crella elegans, which have overlapping ecological distributions but contrasting population densities and resilience. We formulated the hypothesis that differential reproductive traits were the main cause underlying these ecological differences in the study area. The issues addressed were whether recruits compete for the substrate, either because their respective reproductive cycles overlap or/and larval performance differs between species, and whether a contrasting investment in reproduction contributed to explain their diverse densities. Both species were simultaneous hermaphrodites and incubated their larvae. The reproductive period was notably shorter in C. elegans than in H. columella, while investment in reproductive tissue was higher in individuals of H. columella than in C. elegans. In contrast, C. elegans larvae harbored larger amounts of lipids and yolk inclusions than H. columella larvae. Moreover, the former contained amazing collagen masses densely packed among their inner cells. H. columella is likely to produce a higher number of poorer equipped larvae while C. elegans seems to produce a lower number of more resistant, better fitted with energy reserves, and thus potentially more successful larvae. These reproductive patterns agree with a higher and stable density of C. elegans in the study site compared with a more variable abundance of H. columella.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baldacconi, R., C. Nonnis-Marzano, E. Gaino & G. Corriero, 2007. Sexual reproduction, larval development and release in Spongia officinalis L. (Porifera, Demospongiae) from the Apulian coast. Marine Biology 152(4): 969–979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanquer, A. & M. J. Uriz, 2010. Population genetics at three spatial scales of a rare sponge living in fragmented habitats. BMC Evolutionary Biology 10: 13

    Google Scholar 

  • Boury-Esnault, N. & B. Jamieson, 1999. Porifera. In Adiyodi, K. G. & R. G. Adiyodi (eds), Reproductive Biology of Invertebrates IX Progress in Male Gamete Ultrastructure and Phylogeny. Wiley, Chichester: 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corriero, G., L. S. Liaci, C. N. Marzano & E. Gaino, 1998. Reproductive strategies of Mycale contarenii (Porifera : Demospongiae). Marine Biology 131(2): 319–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Caralt, S., M. J. Uriz, A. V. Ereskovsky & R. H. Wijffels, 2007. Embryo development of Corticium candelabrum (Demospongiae : Homosclerophorida). Invertebrate Biology 126(3): 211–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vos, L., K. Rützler, N. Boury-Esnault, C. Donadey & J. Vacelet, 1991. Atlas of sponge morphology. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington and London: 117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ereskovsky, A. V., 2000. Reproduction cycles and strategies of the cold-water sponges Halisarca dujardini (Demospongiae, Halisarcida), Myxilla incrustans and Iophon piceus (Demospongiae, Poecilosclerida) from the White Sea. Biological Bulletin 198(1): 77–87.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ereskovsky, A. V., 2010. The Comparative Embryology of Sponges. Springer, Dordrecht, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fell, P. E., 1974. Porifera. In Giese, A. & J. Pearse (eds), Reproduction of Marine Invertebrates: Acoelomate and Pseudocoelomate Metazoans. Academis Press, New York: 51–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guardiola, M., J. Frotscher & M. J. Uriz, 2011. Genetic structure and temporal differentiation of cohorts of a recently introduced sponge (Paraleucilla magna) to the western Mediterranean. Hydrobiologia (in press).

  • Hooper, J. N. A. & R. W. M. Van Soest (eds), 2002. Systema Porifera: A Guide to the Classification of Sponges. Kluwer Academis/Plenum Publishers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilan, M., 1995. Reproductive Biology, Taxonomy, and Aspects of Chemical Ecology of Latrunculiidae (Porifera). Biological Bulletin 188: 306–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilan, M. & Y. Loya, 1990. Sexual reproduction and settlement of the coral reef sponge Chalinula sp. from the Red Sea. Marine Biology 105(1): 25–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilan, M., J. Gugel & R. W. M. Van Soest, 2004. Taxonomy, reproduction and ecology of new and known Red Sea sponges. Sarsia 89(6): 388–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepore, E., M. Sciscioli, L. Scalera-Liaci, G. Santarelli & E. Gaino, 2000. Sexual reproduction of Cinachyra tarentina (Porifera, Demospongiae). Italian Journal of Zoology 67: 153–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lévi, C., 1973. Systématique de la classe des Demospongiaria (Démosponges). In Grassé, P. P., P. Brien, C. Lévi, M. Sarà, O. Tuzet & J. Vacelet (eds), Traité de Zoologie: Anatomie, systématique, biologie Spongiaires. Masson et Cie, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leys, S. P. & A. V. Ereskovsky, 2006. Embryogenesis and larval differentiation in sponges. Canadian Journal of Zoology 84: 262–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leys, S. P. & H. M. Reiswig, 1998. Transport pathways in the neotropical sponge Aplysina. Biological Bulletin 195: 30–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mariani, S., M. J. Uriz & X. Turon, 2005. The dynamics of sponge larvae assemblages from northwestern Mediterranean nearshore bottoms. Journal of Plankton Research 27(3): 249–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piscitelli, M., G. Corriero, E. Gaino & M.-J. Uriz, 2011. Reproductive cycles of the sympatric excavating sponges Cliona celata and Cliona viridis in the Mediterranean Sea. Invertebrate Biology 130(1): 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiswig, H. M., 1973. Population-dynamics of three Jamaican demospongiae. Bulletin of Marine Science 23(2): 191–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiswig, H. M., 1983. Porifera. In Adiyodi, K. G. & R. G. Adiyodi (eds), Reproductive Biology of Invertebrates II Spermatogenesis and Sperm function. Wiley, Chichester: 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riesgo, A. & M. Maldonado, 2008. Differences in reproductive timing among sponges sharing habitat and thermal regime. Invertebrate Biology 127(4): 357–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riesgo, A. & M. Maldonado, 2009. An unexpectedly sophisticated, V-shaped spermatozoon in Demospongiae (Porifera): reproductive and evolutionary implications. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 97: 413–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riesgo, A., C. Taylor & S. P. Leys, 2007. Reproduction in a carnivorous sponge: the significance of the absence of an aquiferous system to the sponge body plan. Evolution & Development 9(6): 618–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosell, D., 1993. Effects of reproduction in Cliona viridis (Hadromerida) on zooxanthellae. Scientia Marina 57: 405–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scalera-Liaci, L. & M. Sciscioli, 1970. Il ciclo sessuale di Erylus discophorus (Schmidt) (Porifera: Tetractinellida). Rivista di Biologia 63: 255–270.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, T. L., 1984. Gamete, embryo, larval development. In Simpson, T. L. (ed.), The cell biology of sponge. Springer, Berlin: 341–413.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Uriz, M. J., M. Maldonado, X. Turon & R. Martí, 1998. How do reproductive output, larval behaviour, and recruitment contribute to adult spatial patterns in Mediterranean encrusting sponges? Marine Ecology Progress Series 167: 137–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uriz, M. J., X. Turon & S. Mariani, 2008. Ultrastructure and dispersal potential of sponge larvae: tufted versus evenly ciliated parenchymellae. Marine Ecology 29: 280–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vacelet, J. & N. Boury-Esnault, 1995. Carnivorous sponges. Nature 373(6512): 333–335.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Whalan, S., M. S. Johnson, E. Harvey & C. Battershill, 2005. Mode of reproduction, recruitment, and genetic subdivision in the brooding sponge Haliclona sp. Marine Biology 146(3): 425–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whalan, S., C. Battershill & R. de Nys, 2007. Sexual reproduction of the brooding sponge Rhopaloeides odorabile. Coral Reefs 26(3): 655–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woollacott, R. M. & R. L. Pinto, 1995. Flagellar basal apparatus and its utility in phylogenetic analyses of the Porifera. Journal of Morphology 226: 247–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank A. García and N. Cortadellas, from the Serveis científico-técnics, Universitat de Barcelona, for sample processing and assistance with electron microscopy, and A. Blanquer, S.de Caralt, E. Serrano, L. Navarro and A. Garí for help with fieldwork. We especially thank G. Giribet and A. Riesgo and two anonymous reviewers for their truly helpful comments on the manuscript. This study has been funded by CTM2007-66635-C02-01 and CTM2010-22218-C02-01 projects (Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation) to MJU and a project-associated fellowship (FPI) to ARP-P.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A.-R. Pérez-Porro.

Additional information

Guest editors: M. Maldonado, X. Turon, M. A. Becerro & M. J. Uriz / Ancient animals, new challenges: developments in sponge research

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pérez-Porro, AR., González, J. & Uriz, M.J. Reproductive traits explain contrasting ecological features in sponges: the sympatric poecilosclerids Hemimycale columella and Crella elegans as examples. Hydrobiologia 687, 315–330 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-011-0919-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-011-0919-6

Keywords

Navigation