Abstract
When exploiting groundwater, it is common to have problems with wells since maintenance activities can interrupt not only the production of water but also its distribution. Planning maintenance activities is a challenge that involves multiple agents, several criteria, and subjective variables. Therefore, this paper proposes a decision model based on a multicriteria approach to prioritize maintenance actions in the wells of a groundwater supply system. The proposed model considers different points of view and has three phases. The first phase consists of understanding the problem and acquiring data. Next, there is a learning process, during which Strategic Options Development and Analysis (SODA), a structuring method, is applied. The third phase uses the Elimination et Choix Traduisant la Realité (Elimination and Choice Translating Reality, “ELECTRE III”) method to evaluate the problem. To determine criteria weights, Simos’ Procedure is used. The model is shown to have established management priorities that assist in making maintenance decisions. Efficiency of the model was demonstrated by applying it in a Brazilian town, where it was seen to yield greater benefits both to the supply company and society than does current maintenance management practice.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ait Mokhtar EH, Laggoune R, Chateauneuf A (2016) Utility-based maintenance optimization for complex water-distribution systems using Bayesian networks. Water Resour Manag 30(12):4153–4170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1412-9
ANA (2013) Conjuntura dos Recursos Hídricos no Brasil 2013. http://www3.snirh.gov.br/portal/snirh/centrais-de-conteudos/conjuntura-dos-recursos-hidricos. Accessed 05 Jan 2018
ANA (2015) Conjuntura dos Recursos Hídricos: Informe 2014. http://www3.snirh.gov.br/portal/snirh/centrais-de-conteudos/conjuntura-dos-recursos-hidricos. Accessed 05 Jan 2018
Banihabib ME, Hashemi-Madani FS, Forghani A (2017) Comparison of compensatory and non-compensatory multi criteria decision making models in water resources strategic management. Water Resour Manag 31(12):3745–3759. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1702-x
Belton V, Stewart TJ (2002) Multiple criteria decision analysis. Kluwer Academic Publisher
Cunha AAR, Morais DC (2017) Problem structuring methods in group decision making: a comparative study of their application. Oper Res Int J 19:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-017-0310-0
Dash JP, Sarangi A, Singh DK (2010) Spatial variability of groundwater depth and quality parameters in the national capital territory of Delhi. Environ Manag 45(3):640–650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-010-9436-z
Doll P, Hoffmann-Dobreva H, Portmanna FT, Siebertb S, Eickerc A, Rodelld M, Strassberge G, Scanlon BR (2012) Impact of water withdrawals from groundwater and surface water on continental water storage variations. J Geodyn 59-60:143–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2011.05.001
Eden C, Ackermann F (2001) SODA – the principles. In: Rosenhead J, Mingers J (eds) Rational analysis for a problematic world revisited. Wiley, Chichester, pp 21–41
Eden C, Ackermann F (2004) Cognitive mapping expert views for policy analysis in the public sector. Eur J Oper Res 152:615–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00061-4
Feng LH, Luo GY (2011) Application of possibility probability distribution in assessing water resource risk in Yiwu City. Water Resour 38(3):409–416. https://doi.org/10.1134/S009780781103002X
Figueira J, Roy B (2002) Determining the weights of criteria in the ELECTRE type methods with a revised Simos’ procedure. Eur J Oper Res 139(2):317–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00370-8
Foster S, Hirata R, Howard K (2011) Groundwater use in developing cities: policy issues arising from current trends. Hydrogeol J 19(2):271–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-010-0681-2
Haider H, Al-Salamah IS, Ghumman AR (2017) Development of groundwater quality index using fuzzy-based multicriteria analysis for Buraydah, Qassim, Saudi Arabia. Arab J Sci Eng 42(9):4033–4051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-017-2578-z
Iftekhar MS, Fogarty J (2017) Impact of water allocation strategies to manage groundwater resources in Western Australia: equity and efficiency considerations. J Hydrol 548:145–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.02.052
Jiao JJ, Leung C, Ding G (2008) Changes to the groundwater system, from 1888 to present in a highly-urbanized coastal area in Hong Kong, China. Hydrogeol J 16(8):1527–1539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-008-0332-z
Lima ML, Romanelli A, Calderon G, Massone HE (2019) Multi-criteria decision model for assessing groundwater pollution risk in the urban-rural interface of Mar del Plata City (Argentina). Environ Monit Assess 191:347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7485-1
Maystre LY, Pictet J, Simos J (1994) Méthodes multicritères ELECTRE. 1.ed. Lausanne, Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes
Monte MBS, de Almeida-Filho AT (2016) Multicriteria approach using MAUT to assist the maintenance of a water supply system located in a low-income community. Water Resour Manag 30(9):3093–3106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1333-7
Mousseau V, Dias L (2004) Valued outranking relations in ELECTRE providing manageable disaggregation procedures. Eur J Oper Res 156:467–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00120-6
Mulligan KB, Brown C, Yang Y-CE, Ahlfeld DP (2014) Assessinf groundwater policy with coupled economic groundwater modelling. Water Resour Res 50:2257–2275. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR013666
Nam Y, Ooka R (2011) Development of potential map for ground and groundwater heat pump systems and the application to Tokyo. Energy Buildings 43(2):677–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.11.011
Peters CN, Baround H, Hornberger GM (2019) Multicriteria decision analysis of drinking water source selection in Southwestern Bangladesh. J Water Res Plan Man 145(4):05019004-1. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001029
Ribas JR, Diaz JIP (2019) Assessment of sustainable use of a multipurpose reservoir through the multicriteria approach: the case of Corumbá IV reservoir, Brazil. Water Resour Manag 33(2):591–602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-2121-3
Roy B (1996) Multicriteria methodology for decision aiding. Kluwer Academic Publishers
Sahoo S, Jha MK, Kumar N, Chowdary VM (2015) Evaluation of GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis and probabilistic modeling for exploring groundwater prospects. Environ Earth Sci 74(3):2223–2246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4213-1
Sallwey J, Valverde JPB, Lópes FV, Junghanns R, Stefan C (2019) Suitability maps for managed aquifer recharge: a review of multi-criteria decision analysis studies. Environ Rev 27(2):138–150. https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2018-0069
Shiklomanov IA, Rodda JC (eds) (2003) World water resources at the beginning of the 21st century. UNESCO International Hydrology Series, Cambridge
Simos J (1990) L’évaluation environnementale: Un processus cognitif négocié. Lausanne, Thèse, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Sinha P (2015) Towards higher maintenance effectiveness: integrating maintenance management with reliability engineering. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 32(7):754–762. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-03-2013-0039
SNIS (2017) Web application series (in Portuguese). http://www.snis.gov.br/aplicacao-web-serie-historica. Accessed 15 Oct 2017
Tameh MAH, Zadeh HM, Arasteh PD (2016) A novel solution to define the optimum number and location of new wells to improve groundwater level map. Procedia Eng 154:252–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.07.471
Trojan F, Morais DC (2012) Prioritizing alternatives for maintenance of water distribution networks: group decision approach. Water SA 38(4):555-564. Available from: http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1816-79502012000400011&lng=en&nrm=iso
UNESCO (2015) The United Nations World Water development report 2015: water for a sustainable world. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002318/231823E.pdf. Accessed 22 Nov 2017
Wang XJ, Zhang JY, Shahid S, He RM, Guan EH, Wu YX, Gao J (2016) Adaptation to climate change impacts on water demand. Mitig Adapt Strat Gl 21(1):81–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-014-9571-6
Zekter IS, Everett LG (Eds) (2004) Groundwater resources of the world and their use. UNESCO: series on Groundwater n.6. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001344/134433e.pdf. Accessed 01 Dec 2017
Acknowledgments
The authors also would like to express sincere gratitude to the editor and anonymous reviewers for insightful comments to improve the quality of the research.
Funding
This work was supported by CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico) under Grant 142,224/2018–9 and 309,117/2018–6; and CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior) under Grant Financial Code 001.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Sousa Pereira, L., Morais, D.C. Multicriteria Decision Model to Establish Maintenance Priorities for Wells in a Groundwater System. Water Resour Manage 34, 377–392 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02457-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02457-8