Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The effect of different TiO2 nanoparticles on the release and transformation of mercury in sediment

  • Sediments, Sec 2 • Physical and Biogeochemical Processes • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The environmental safety of both nano-TiO2 particles and mercury (Hg) pollution has been of widespread concern. Soils and sediments were the main receiving environments of nano-TiO2 and Hg. There was a strong association between nano-TiO2 with Hg compounds. Very limited research has been carried out on the impact of nano-TiO2 on the environmental behavior of Hg in sediments. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of nano-TiO2 on the release and transformation of Hg in sediments.

Materials and methods

Two types of TiO2 nanoparticles were employed. Sediment samples were collected in the water level fluctuating zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir, China. Sediment samples spiked with HgCl2 solution were taken as Hg-contaminated sediments. The flooding experiments were conducted using capped borosilicate glass bottles containing 300 ml TiO2 suspensions (0.2 g L−1 and 0.4 g L−1) and 30 g original or Hg-contaminated sediment samples outdoors. All experiments were conducted in triplicate. Water samples were collected at determined interval times over a 60-day period. Sediments were collected on the 60th day. Total Hg (THg) and methylmercury (MHg) in both water and sediment samples and Hg speciation just in sediment samples were determined. A series of control samples without TiO2 addition were also prepared.

Results and discussion

The results showed that nano-TiO2 particles at high content (4 g kg−1) promoted the release of Hg in sediments, and the anatase particles showed a stronger effect. Methyl Hg concentrations in waters of nano-TiO2 treatments significantly decreased by the 10th day. The effect of nano-TiO2 greatly depended on anatase and rutile particles. After that, methyl Hg concentrations had no significant difference between nano-TiO2 treatments and the control, except 2 g kg−1 rutile treatment by the 20th day. The changes of Hg speciation in sediments demonstrated that nano-TiO2 inhibited the transformation of Hg-bound organic matter into the oxidated state, especially upon 2 g kg−1 rutile treatment. This was consistent with the lower MHg concentrations in the 2 g kg−1 rutile treatment.

Conclusions

Both anatase and rutile nano-TiO2 were found to affect the release of Hg in sediment. Nano-TiO2 promoted THg release in sediments and posed an increased risk of Hg contamination in waters, especially for anatase particles. Moreover, nano-TiO2 inhibited the methylation process of Hg in sediments at the initial stage of flooding and could affect the transformation of Hg speciation in sediments, especially for low-content rutile particles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bao Z-d, Wang J-x, Feng X-b, Shang L-h (2011) Distribution of mercury speciation in polluted soils of Wanshan mercury mining area in Guizhou. Chinese J Ecology 30:907–913

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradford A, Handy RD, Readman JW, Atfield A, Mühling M (2009) Impact of silver nanoparticle contamination on the genetic diversity of natural bacterial assemblages in estuarine sediments. Environ Sci Technol 43:4530–4536

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Contado C, Pagnoni A (2008) TiO2 in commercial sunscreen lotion: flow field-flow fractionation and ICP-AES together for size analysis. Anal Chem 80:7594–7608

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cristante VM, Araujo AB, Jorge S, Florentino AO, Valente JP, Padilha PM (2006) Enhanced photocatalytic reduction of Hg (II) in aqueous medium by 2-aminothiazole-modified TiO2 particles. J Brazil Chem Soc 17:453–457

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ding Z, Liu J, Li L, Lin H, Wu H, Hu Z (2009) Distribution and speciation of mercury in surficial sediments from main mangrove wetlands in China. Mar Pollut Bull 58:1319–1325

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dou B, Chen H (2011) Removal of toxic mercury (II) from aquatic solutions by synthesized TiO2 nanoparticles. Desalination 269:260–265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Du Laing G, Rinklebe J, Vandecasteele B, Meers E, Tack F (2009) Trace metal behaviour in estuarine and riverine floodplain soils and sediments: a review. Sci Total Environ 407:3972–3985

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • EPA US (2001) Method 1630: methyl mercury in water by distillation, aqueous ethylation, purge and trap, and CVAFS

  • Fleming EJ, Mack EE, Green PG, Nelson DC (2006) Mercury methylation from unexpected sources: molybdate-inhibited freshwater sediments and an iron-reducing bacterium. Appl Environ Microb 72:457–464

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gao J, Bonzongo JCJ, Bitton G, Li Y, Wu CY (2008) Nanowastes and the environment: using mercury as an example pollutant to assess the environmental fate of chemicals adsorbed onto manufactured nanomaterials. Environ Toxicol Chem 27:808–810

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ge Y, Schimel JP, Holden PA (2011) Evidence for negative effects of TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles on soil bacterial communities. Environ Sci Technol 45:1659–1664

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ge Y, Schimel JP, Holden PA (2012) Identification of soil bacteria susceptible to TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles. Appl Environ Microb 78:6749–6758

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ge Y, Priester JH, Van De Werfhorst LC, Schimel JP, Holden PA (2013) Potential mechanisms and environmental controls of TiO2 nanoparticle effects on soil bacterial communities. Environ Sci Technol 47:14411–14417

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ghasemi Z, Seif A, Ahmadi TS, Zargar B, Rashidi F, Rouzbahani GM (2012) Thermodynamic and kinetic studies for the adsorption of Hg (II) by nano-TiO2 from aqueous solution. Adv Powder Technol 23:148–156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gilmour CC, Henry EA, Mitchell R (1992) Sulfate stimulation of mercury methylation in freshwater sediments. Environ Sci Technol 26:2281–2287

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk F, Sonderer T, Scholz RW, Nowack B (2009) Modeled environmental concentrations of engineered nanomaterials (TiO2, ZnO, Ag, CNT, fullerenes) for different regions. Environ Sci Technol 43:9216–9222

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Handy RD, Owen R, Valsami-Jones E (2008) The ecotoxicology of nanoparticles and nanomaterials: current status, knowledge gaps, challenges, and future needs. Ecotoxicology 17:315–325

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • King JK, Kostka JE, Frischer ME, Saunders FM, Jahnke RA (2001) A quantitative relationship that demonstrates mercury methylation rates in marine sediments are based on the community composition and activity of sulfate-reducing bacteria. Environ Sci Technol 35:2491–2496

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kiser M, Westerhoff P, Benn T, Wang Y, Perez-Rivera J, Hristovski K (2009) Titanium nanomaterial removal and release from wastewater treatment plants. Environ Sci Technol 43:6757–6763

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu G, Cai Y, O’Driscoll N (2011) Environmental chemistry and toxicology of mercury. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lomer MC, Thompson RP, Commisso J, Keen CL, Powell JJ (2000) Determination of titanium dioxide in foods using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry. Analyst 125:2339–2343

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • López-Muñoz M, Aguado J, Arencibia A, Pascual R (2011) Mercury removal from aqueous solutions of HgCl2 by heterogeneous photocatalysis with TiO2. Appl Catal B Environ 104:220–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo Z, Wang Z, Li Q, Pan Q, Yan C, Liu F (2011) Spatial distribution, electron microscopy analysis of titanium and its correlation to heavy metals: occurrence and sources of titanium nanomaterials in surface sediments from Xiamen Bay, China. J Environ Monitor 13:1046–1052

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miranda C, Yáñez J, Contreras D, Garcia R, Jardim WF, Mansilla HD (2009) Photocatalytic removal of methylmercury assisted by UV-A irradiation. Appl Catal B Environ 90:115–119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miranda C, Yanez J, Contreras D, Zaror C, Mansilla HD (2013) Phenylmercury degradation by heterogeneous photocatalysis assisted by UV-A light. J Environ Sci Heal A 48:1642–1648

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nohynek GJ, Lademann J, Ribaud C, Roberts MS (2007) Grey goo on the skin? Nanotechnology, cosmetic and sunscreen safety. Crit Rev Toxicol 37:251–277

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pak KR, Bartha R (1998) Mercury methylation and demethylation in anoxic lake sediments and by strictly anaerobic bacteria. Appl Environ Microb 64:1013–1017

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Popov A, Priezzhev A, Lademann J, Myllylä R (2005) TiO2 nanoparticles as an effective UV-B radiation skin-protective compound in sunscreens. J Phys D Appl Phys 38:2564

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Priester JH, Ge Y, Chang V, Stoimenov PK, Schimel JP, Stucky GD (2013) Assessing interactions of hydrophilic nanoscale TiO2 with soil water. J Nanopart Res 15:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reijnders L (2006) Cleaner nanotechnology and hazard reduction of manufactured nanoparticles. J Clean Prod 14:124–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao D, Kang Y, Wu S, Wong MH (2012) Effects of sulfate reducing bacteria and sulfate concentrations on mercury methylation in freshwater sediments. Sci Total Environ 424:331–336

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • The Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies (2013) Analysis: this is the first publicly available on-line inventory of nanotechnology-based consumer products

  • USEPA (2009) Targeted national sewage sludge survey sampling and analysis technical report. United States Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC

  • Wang H, Zhou S, Xiao L, Wang Y, Liu Y, Wu Z (2011) Titania nanotubes—a unique photocatalyst and adsorbent for elemental mercury removal. Catal Today 175:202–208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Wang D, Li C, Zhang C, Liang L, Zhou X (2015) Effects of nano-TiO2 on release and speciation changes of aluminum, iron and manganese in soil. J Soil Water Conserv 2:238–241 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41173116), the National Key Basic Research Program of China (973 Program 2013CB430004), and the Scientific Research Project of Sichuan Provincial Department of Education (16ZB0298).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Neijiang Normal University, Neijiang, 641112, China

    Jinyang Zhang

  2. College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, China

    Jinyang Zhang, Chuxian Li, Dingyong Wang, Cheng Zhang, Li Liang & Xiong Zhou

  3. Chongqing Key Laboratory of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Chongqing, 400715, China

    Dingyong Wang & Cheng Zhang

Authors
  1. Jinyang Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chuxian Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dingyong Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Cheng Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Li Liang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xiong Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dingyong Wang.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Ian Foster

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, J., Li, C., Wang, D. et al. The effect of different TiO2 nanoparticles on the release and transformation of mercury in sediment. J Soils Sediments 17, 536–542 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-016-1580-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-016-1580-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation