Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical study on the response of the Earth’s magnetosphere-ionosphere system to a super solar storm

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Science China Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the approaching of the 24th solar cycle peak year (2012–2014), the impacts of super solar storms on the geospace environment have drawn attentions. Based on the geomagnetic field observations during Carrington event in 1859, we estimate the interplanetary solar wind conditions at that time, and investigate the response of the magnetosphere-ionosphere system to this extreme solar wind conditions using global 3D MHD simulations. The main findings include: 1) The day-side magnetopause and bow shock are compressed to 4.3 and 6.0 Re (Earth radius), and their flanks are also strongly compressed. The magnetopause shifts inside the geosynchronous orbit, exposing geosynchronous satellites in the solar wind in the magnetosheath. 2) During the storm, the region-1 current increases by about 60 times, and the cross polar potential drop increases by about 80 times; the reconnection voltage is about 5 to 6 times larger than the average storms, which means a larger amount of the solar wind energy enters the magnetosphere, resulting in strong space weather phenomena.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cliver E W, Svalgaard L. The 1859 solar-terrestrial disturbance and the current limits of extreme space weather activity. Solar Phys, 2004, 224: 407–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Clauer C R, Siscoe G. The great historical geomagnetic storm of 1859: A modern look. Adv Space Res, 2006, 38: 117–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Green J L, Boardsen S. Duration and extent of the great auroral storm of 1859. Adv Space Res, 2006, 38: 130–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Odenwald S, Green J, Taylor W. Forecasting the impact of an 1859-calibre superstorm on satellite resources. Adv Space Res, 2006, 38: 280–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shue J H, Chao J K, Fu H C, et al. A new functional form to study the solar wind control of magnetopause size and location. J Geophys Res, 1997, 102: 9497–9511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lin R L, Zhang X X, Liu S Q, et al. A three-dimensional asymmetric magnetopause model. J Geophys Res, 2010, 115, doi: 10.1029/ 2009JA014235

  7. Shue J H, Song P, Russell C T, et al. Magnetopause location under extreme solar wind conditions. J Geophys Res, 1998, 103: 17691–17700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Guo X C, Wang C, Hu Y Q, et al. Bow shock contributions to region 1 field-aligned current: A new result from global MHD simulations. Geophys Res Lett, 2008, 35: L03108, doi: 10.1029/2007GL032713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ridley A J, De Zeeuw D L, Manchester W B, et al. The magnetospheric and ionospheric response to a very strong interplanetary shock and coronal mass ejection. Adv Space Res, 2006, 38: 263–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Powell K, Roe P, Linde T, et al. A solution-adaptive upwind scheme for ideal magnetohydrodynamics. J Comput Phys, 1999, 154: 284–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tsurutani B T, Gonzalez W D, Lakhina G S. The extreme magnetic storm of September 1–2, 1859. J Geophys Res, 2003, doi: 10.1029/2002JA009504

  12. Li X L, Temerin M, Tsurutani B T, et al. Modeling of 1–2 September 1859 super magnetic storm. Adv Space Res, 2006, 38: 273–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Temerin M, Li X. A new model for the prediction of Dst on the basis of the solar wind. J Geophys Res, 2002, 107: 1472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang C, Li H, Richardson J D, et al. Interplanetary shock characteristics and associated geosynchronous magnetic field variations deduced from sudden impulses observed on the ground. J Geophys Res, 2010, 115, doi: 10.1029/2009JA014833

  15. Hu Y Q, Guo X C, Wang C. On the ionospheric and reconnection potentials of the earth: Results from global MHD simulations. J Geophys Res, 2007, 112, doi: 10.1029/2006JA012145

  16. Li H, Wang C, Kan J R. Mid-day magnetopause shifts earthward of geosynchronous orbit during geomagnetic superstorms with Dst <−300 nT. J Geophys Res, 2010, 115: A08230, doi: 10.1029/2009JA014612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liou K, Wu C C, Lepping R P, et al. Midday sub-auroral patches (MSPs) associated with interplanetary shocks. Geophys Res Lett, 2002, 29: 16–20

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fedder J A, Lyon J G, Slinker S P, et al. Topological structure of the magnetotail as a function of interplanetary magnetic field direction. J Geophys Res, 1995, 100: 3613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Siscoe G L, Erickson G M, Sonnerup B U O, et al. Hill model of transpolar potential saturation: Comparisons with MHD simulations. J Geophys Res, 2002, 107, doi: 10.1029/2001JA000109

  20. Hill T W, Dessler A J, Wolf R A. Mercury and Mars: The role of ionospheric conductivity in the acceleration of magnetospheric particles. Geophys Res Lett, 1976, 3: 429–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hill T W. Magnetic coupling between solar wind and magnetosphere: Regulated by ionospheric conductance? Eos Trans AGU, 1984, 65: 1047

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chi Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, C., Li, H., Guo, X. et al. Numerical study on the response of the Earth’s magnetosphere-ionosphere system to a super solar storm. Sci. China Earth Sci. 55, 1037–1042 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-012-4405-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-012-4405-4

Keywords

Navigation