Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Aeromagnetic anomaly map for India: the scientific need

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aeromagnetic methods are primarily used for regional geological mapping and in the exploration of natural resources such as oil and gas, minerals, and groundwater. They are also extremely useful in research studies on the internal structure and evolution of the earth, plate tectonics, and earthquakes. Such studies require the potential field aeromagnetic data to be digitally accessible. Aeromagnetic data coverage has already been completed and published for many countries and continents; digitally compiled anomaly maps were prepared and are being used in the exploration and exploitation of natural resources, disaster studies, and research activities. In contrast, India is not entirely covered by aeromagnetic surveying. But certain selected regions covering approximately 70% of the geographic land area of the country were covered with diverse technical specifications and the data is available in a number of disparate individual surveys and flying seasons, tied-up individually to their respective tie-line set up, largely non-digital and poorly archived. The gap areas include the Himalayas, Gangetic plains, Bengal basin, Deccan traps, and Aravalli mountains. The aeromagnetic coverage of these areas is also extremely important with regard to natural resources and hazards. Hence, the gap areas are also required to be covered and the whole data of the country need to be digitally linked together, on top priority, for generating a digitally compiled aeromagnetic anomaly map and database for India. The aeromagnetic data of approximately 48,400 km2 of area flown in three different blocks and time periods with varied survey specifications comprising parts of Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, and Karnataka states of southern India was digitally compiled and is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aitken AR, Betts PG (2008) High-resolution aeromagnetic data over central Australia assist Grenville-era (1300-1100 MA), Rodinia reconstructions. Geophys Res Lett 35:L01306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anand SP, Rajaram M (2002) Aeromagnetic data to probe the Dharwar craton. Curr Sci 83:162–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Babu Rao V, Atchuta Rao D, Rama Rao C, Sarma BSP, Bhaskara Rao DS, Veeraswamy K, Sarma MRL (1987) Some salient results of interpretation of aeromagnetic data over Cuddapah basin and adjoining terrain, South India. Memoirs Geol Soc India 6:295–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballukraya PN, Kalimuthu R (2010) Quantitative hydrogeological and geomorphological analyses for groundwater potential assessment in hard rock terrains. Curr Sci 98:253–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks D, Rohr-Torp E, Skarphagen H (1994) Groundwater resources in hard rock: experiences from the Havaler study, SE Norway. Appl Hydrogeol 2:33–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barritt SD (1993) The African magnetic mapping project. ITC J 2:122–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastia R, Reeves C, Pundarika Rao D, D’Silva K, Radha Krishna M (2010) Paleogeographic Re-construction of East Gondwana and evolution of the Indian continental margin. DCS-DST News, 8 p

  • Berger Z, Fortin D and Wang X (2004) High-resolution aeromagnetic (HRAM) surveys: exploration applications from the western Canada sedimentary basin – exploration in highly deformed terrains using fixed-wing aircraft and helicopter-mounted systems, American Association of Petroleum Geology, Search and Discovery Article, 40123.

  • Blakely RJ (1995) Potential theory in gravity and magnetic applications, xix +, 441 p

  • Boyd D (1969) The contribution of airborne magnetic survey to geological mapping, Mining and Groundwater Geophysics 1967. Geol Surv Canada Econ Geol Rep 26:213–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd DM, Isles DJ (2007) Geological interpretation of airborne magnetic surveys-40 years on. In: Milkereit B (ed) Exploration 07: Fifth Decennial International Conference on Mineral Exploration, Proceedings, pp 491–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekhar P (1997) Digital aeromagnetic compilation over parts of southern India, Research Project Report, Department of Exploration Geophysics, ITC, The Netherlands, 28 p

  • Chandrasekhar P (2010) Integration of high resolution satellite data and electrical resistivity technique for groundwater exploration and exploitation over parts of Mahbubnagar district, A. P., India. J Indian Geophys Union 14:211–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekhar P, Seshadri K (2013) Analysis of remote sensing and aeromagnetic data for identification of the causative factors for the recent micro-seismicity observed in Vanasthalipuram area of Ranga Reddy district, Andhra Pradesh, India. Curr Sci 104:502–508

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekhar P, Erren H, Reeves CV (2000) Digitally compiled aeromagnetic map over a part of south India. Visakha Sci J Andhra Pradesh Acad Sci 4:157–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekhar P, Martha TR, Venkateswarlu N, Subramanian SK, Kamaraju MVV (2011) Regional geological studies over parts of Deccan Syneclise using remote sensing and geophysical data for understanding hydrocarbon prospects. Curr Sci 100:95–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekhar P, Chandra Mouli K, Rao DP, Dadhwal VK (2018) Subsurface geological structure and tectonics as evidenced from integrated interpretation of aeromagnetic and remote sensing data over Kutch sedimentary basin, western India. Curr Sci 114:174–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan and Cowan (1991) Analytical techniques in interpretation of aeromagnetic data. Explor Geophys 22:81–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan DR, Bigent M (1995) Aeromagnetic gradiometers-a perspective. Explor Geophys 26:241–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh D, Ramesh Acharya G (2006) Structural features of Bundelkhand Granite Complex for geology and structure. J Geol Soc India 68:949–958

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardwick CD (1996) Aeromagnetic gradiometry in 1995. Explor Geophys 27:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinze WJ, Zietz I (1985) The composite magnetic anomaly map of the conterminous United States: the utility of regional gravity and magnetic anomaly maps, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Hinze WJ (ed)

  • Isles DJ, Rankin LR (2013) Geological interpretation of aeromagnetic data, Published by The Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists, p 357

  • Kamaraju MVV, Chandrasekhar P, Suryanarayana M, Bhattacharya A (2003) Analysis of horizontal derivatives of aeromagnetic data in conjunction with satellite data for ground water exploration. National Symposium of Applied Geochemistry in Exploration for Minerals and Oil, AMD, Abstract Volume, Sept 10-11, pp. 51-52

  • Kowalik WS, Glenn WE (1987) Image processing of aeromagnetic data and integration with Landsat images for improved structural interpretation. ITC J 4:305–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Oldenburg DW (1996) 3-D inversion of magnetic data. Geophysics 61:394–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod IN, Jones K, Fan Dai T (1993) 3-D analytic signal in the interpretation of total magnetic field data at low magnetic latitudes. Explor Geophys 24:679–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathew MP, Ramachandra HM, Gouda HC, Singh RK, Ramesh Acharya G, Murthy CVVS, Rao KS (2001) IGRF corrected regional aeromagnetic anomaly map of parts of peninsular India-potential for mapping and mineral exploration. GSI Spec Publ 58:395–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Milligan PR, Gunn PJ (1997) Enhancement and presentation of airborne geophysical data. AGSO J Aust Geol Geophys 17:63–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Murthy BSR (2007) Airborne geophysics and the Indian scenario. J Indian Geophys Union 11:1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • NRSA Tech. Rep. No. NRSA.AD.44.TR-1/1998 (1998) Aeromagnetic survey–interpretation with IRS data in structural mapping for hydrocarbon exploration over Kutch Basin, Gujarat. Restricted, 112 p

  • NRSA Tech. Rep. No. NRSA:AS&DM:93/2006 (2006) High Resolution Aeromagnetic (HRAM) survey conducted over block 6 covering parts of Punjab, Haryana, Uttaranchal and Uttar Pradesh. Restricted, 67 p

  • Prasanti Lakshmi M, Ram Babu HV (2002) Basement structure of the southwestern part of the Cuddapah basin from aeromagnetic anomalies. Curr Sci 82:1378–1381

    Google Scholar 

  • Proceedings of the Workshop on Airborne Geophysics; AEG; Hyderabad (1997) Editor: Colin V. Reeves; (AEG Publication No.36)

  • Qui S (1994) An analytical signal approach to the interpretation of total field magnetic anomalies. Geophys Prospect 42:665–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajaram M, Anand SP (2003) Central Indian tectonics revisited using aeromagnetic data. E-Letter Earth Planets Space 55:1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajaram M, Anand SP, Balakrishna TS (2006) Composite magnetic anomaly map of India and its contiguous regions. J Geol Soc India 68:569–576

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajeevan M (2016) Earth sciences for societal and economic benefits. Curr Sci III 2:1891–1892

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajendra S, Murthy CVVS, Gouda HC, Singh RK (2006) Analysis of aeromagnetic data over part of Bundelkhand Granite Complex delineated by aeromagnetic expression around Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh. J Geol Soc India 68:949–958

    Google Scholar 

  • Rama Rao BS, Murthy IVR (1978) Gravity and magnetic methods of prospecting. Arnold– Heinemann publishers, 390 p

  • Ramachandra Rao MB (1987) Outlines of geophysical prospecting-a manual for geologists. Dev Dutt publishers, EBD Educational Pvt. Ltd., Dehradun, 403 p

  • Ramachandra HM, Mathew MP, Ramesh Acharya G, Gouda HC, Singh RK (2001) Aeromagnetic anomaly interpretation and correlation with geological features of central India. GSI Spec Publ 64:163–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao DP (2000) Modern trends in mineral exploration and environmental studies. UGC sponsored DRS programme (Phase III), Dept. of Geophysics, Osmania University, 12 p

  • Rao DP, Bhattacharya A, Navalgund RR, Sengupta S, Roy AK, Masthan B, Hegde VS, Suryanarayana M (1992) Oil field detection through remote sensing. NRSA Technical Report, Restricted, 11 p

  • Reddy AGB, Mathew MP, Singh B, Naidu PS (1988) Aeromagnetic evidence of crustal structure in the granulite terrain of Tamil Nadu-Kerala. J Geol Soc India 32:368–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves CV (1992) New horizons in airborne geophysical mapping. Explor Geophys 23:273–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeves CV (1994) Towards a magnetic anomaly map of reconstructed Gondwana. Ninth Int Gondwana Symp 2:963–969

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves (2005) Aeromagnetic surveys-principles, practice and interpretation. Published by Geosoft, 155 p

  • Reeves (2009) Re-examining the evidence from plate-tectonics for the initiation of Africa’s passive margins. Geological Society of Houston/Petroleum Exploration Society, Great Britain, London, Sept. 9-10, 4 p

  • Reeves CV, Sahu BK, de Wit MJ (2002) A re-examination of the paleo-position of Africa’s eastern neighbours in Gondwana. J Afr Earth Sci 34:101–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid AB, Allsop JM, Gransee H, Millet AJ, Somerton IW (1990) Magnetic interpretation in three dimensions using Euler deconvolution. Geophysics 55:80–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roest WR, Verhoef J, Pilkington M (1992) Magnetic interpretation using the 3-D analytic signal. Geophysics 57:116–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singhal BBS (2007) Nature of hard rock aquifers: hydrogeological uncertainties and ambiguities, Groundwater Dynamics in Hard Rock Aquifers. Edited by Shakeel Ahmed, R. Jayakumar and Abdin Salih, 20-39

  • Suryanarayana M, Bhattacharya A, Rao DP (1992) Image processing of aeromagnetic data and its integration with satellite image for improved geological interpretation-a case study of Orissa, India. J Assoc Explor Geophys XIII 3:117–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Suryanarayana M, Bhattacharya A, Kamaraju MVV (1996) Aeromagnetic surveys in India by NRSA - a review, in C. V. Reeves (edit.) Proc. of workshop on Airborne Geophysics, AEG-ITC Joint Publication, 77-84

  • Tiwari VM, Singh B, Arora K, Kumar S (2010) The potential of satellite gravity and gravity gradiometry in deciphering structural setting of the Himalayan Collision Zone. Curr Sci 99:1795–1800

    Google Scholar 

  • Zevan H, Pous J (1991) A new 3-D inversion algorithm for magnetic total field anomalies. Geophys J Int 104:583–591

    Google Scholar 

  • Zonenshain LP, Verhoef J, MacNab R, Meyers H (1991) Magnetic imprints of continental accretion in the USSR. EOS 72:305–310

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the GSI, ONGC, DGH, AMD, and NPOL for funding aeromagnetic projects. Chandrasekhar would like to thank Dr. D.P. Rao, former Director, NRSC, for technical guidance and Director, NRSC, and DD (MSA), NRSC for encouragement. Thanks to all the three anonymous reviewers for their critical observation which has helped in improving the quality of the manuscript significantly.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chandrasekhar Patibandla.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Mehdi Eshagh

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Patibandla, C., Dadhwal, V.K. Aeromagnetic anomaly map for India: the scientific need. Arab J Geosci 13, 433 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-05453-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-05453-0

Keywords

Navigation