Abstract
Water quality is a very important factor for drinking, irrigation, and industry usage. Sodium adsorption rate (SAR) is one of the water quality parameters, which has a vital role in irrigation because of decreasing infiltration in the soil. For future planning of irrigation, forecasting of SAR is necessary. We applied radial basis function (RBF), adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system-grid partitioning (ANFIS-GP), ANIFIS-SC (SC is subtractive clustering), and ANFIS-FCMC (FCMC is fuzzy c-means clustering), to predict SAR of Aras, Sefid-Rud, Karun, and Mond Rivers, which cover part of the north, northwest, southwest, and south of Iran. We used 15 years’ monthly data, including discharge, pH, chloride (Cl), sulfate (SO4), bicarbonate (HCO3), and electrical conductivity (EC), as input to neural networks. The RBF neural network reached proper results of SAR prediction in training and testing in the Aras, Sefid-Rud, Karun, and Mond Rivers, in which the mean square error (MSE) for training was between 0.000255 and 0.0017 and coefficient of determination (R2) of testing varies between 0.902 and 0.96 using normalized data. ANFIS-GP did not reach the proper model performance (R2 were between 0–0.21 and 0.55 and index of agreement were between 0.55 and 0.88) for the four rivers in comparison with ANFIS-SC and ANFIS-FCMC, since ANFIS-GP may need a long time of processing to analyze numerous combinations of the membership function. The normalization of input data of ANFIS-FCMC improved the performance of the model of the four rivers slightly. However, the normalization of input data of ANFIS-FCMC for SAR prediction of the Aras River did not improve the performance of the model (R2 = 0.48 and index of agreement = 0.44). We could state that variable processing via normalization might not necessarily improve ANFIS model performance. The training of ANFIS did not reach appropriate results for the Mond River because of scattering data. We may state that ANFIS is not a proper method for using scatter data. The results of sensitivity in Sefid-Rud River use the RBF neural network indicated that the electrical conductivity had a maximum effect (19.8%) and the discharge (13%) had the minimum effect on SAR prediction.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aboukarima AM, Al-Sulaiman MA (2018) Effect of sodium adsorption ratio and electrical conductivity of the applied water infiltration in a sandy-loam soil. Water SA 44(1):105–110
Adnan RM, Yuan X, Kisi O, Muhammad Adnan M, Mehmood (2018) A stream flow forecasting of poorly gauged mountainous watershed by least square support vector machine, fuzzy genetic algorithm and M5 model tree using climatic data from nearby station. Water Resour Manag 32:4469–4486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-2033-2
Adnan RM, Liang Z, Yuan X, Kisi O, Muhammad Akhlaq M, Li B (2019a) Comparison of LSSVR, M5RT, NF-GP, and NF-SC models for predictions of hourly wind speed and wind power based on cross-validation. Energies 12(2):329. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12020329
Adnan RM, Liang Z, El-Shafie A, Zounemat-Kermani M, Kisi O (2019b) Prediction of suspended sediment load using data-driven models. Water 11(2060):1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11102060
Adnan RM, Liang Z, Trajkovic S, Zounemat-Kermani M, BinquanLi B, Kisi O (2019c) Daily streamflow prediction using optimally pruned extreme learning machine. J Hydrodyn 577:123981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.123981
Adnan RM, Malik A, Kumar A, Singh Parmar K, Kisi O (2019d) Pan evaporation modeling by three different neuro-fuzzy intelligent systems using climatic inputs, Arabian. J Geosci 12:606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-019-4781-6
Adnan RM, Liang Z, Heddam S, Zounemat-Kermani M, Kisi O, Li B (2020a) Least square support vector machine and multivariate adaptive regression splines for streamflow prediction in the mountainous basin using hydro-meteorological data as inputs. J Hydrodyn 586:124371
Adnan RM, Chen Z, Yuan X, Kisi O, El-Shafie A, Kuriqi A, Ikram M (2020b) Reference evapotranspiration modeling using new heuristic methods. Entropy 22:547. https://doi.org/10.3390/e22050547
Asadi M, Guo H, McPhedrwn K (2020) Biogas production estimation using the data-driven approach for cold region municipal wastewater anaerobic digestion. J Environ Manag 253:109708. https://doi.org/10.1016/jenvman
Asadollahfardi G, Hemati A, Moradinejad S, Asadollahfardi R (2013) Sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) prediction of the Chalghazi River using artificial neural network (ANN) Iran. Curr World Environ 8(2):169–178. https://doi.org/10.12944/CWE.8.2.02
Asadollahfardi G, Homayoun Aria S, Abaei M (2016) Modeling dissolved oxygen (DO) in lake and reservoir. J Adv Environ Res 5-3:153–167. https://doi.org/10.12989/aer.2016.5.3.153
Azad A, Karami H, Farzin S, Saeedin A, Kashi H, Sayyahi F (2017) Prediction of water quality parameters using ANFIS optimized by intelligence algorithms. Case Study: Gorganrood River 22:2206–2213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-1703-6
Beltramo T, Ranzan C, Hinrichs J, Hitzmann B (2016) Artificial neural network prediction of the biogas flow rate optimized with an ant colony algorithm. Biosyst Eng 143:68–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2016.01.006
Benmouiza K, Cheknane A (2019) Clustered ANFIS network using fuzzy c-means, subtractive clustering, and grid partitioning for hourly solar radiation forecasting. Theor Appl Climatol 137:31–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-018-2576-4
Borji M, Malekian A, Salajegheh A, Ghadimi M (2016) Multi-time-scale analysis of hydrological drought forecasting using support vector regression (SVR) and artificial neural networks (ANN). Arabian J of Geos 9(19):725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-016-2750-x
Cakmakci M (2007) Adaptive neuro-fuzzy modeling of anaerobic digestion of primary sedimentation sludge. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 30(50):349–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-007-0131-2
Choubin B, Malekian A (2017) Combined gamma and M-test-based ANN and ARIMA models for groundwater fluctuation forecasting in semiarid regions. Environ Earth Sci 76(15):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6870-8
Choubin B, Khalighi-Sigaroodi S, Malekian A, Kisi Ö (2016) Multiple linear regression, multi-layer perceptron network, and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for forecasting precipitation based on large-scale climate signal. Hydrol Sci J 61(6):1001–1009. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2014.966721
Dawson CW, Wibly RL (2001) Hydrological modeling using artificial neural networks. Prog Phys Geogr 25(80):81–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913330102500104
El-Morsy EA, Malik M, Letey J (1991) Interaction between water quality and polymer treated on infiltration rate and clay migrations. Soil Technol 493:221–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/0933-3630(91)90003-6
Elshorbagy A, Corzo G, Srinivasulu S, Solomatine DP (2010) Experimental investigation of the predictive capabilities of data-driven modeling techniques in hydrology-part 1: concepts and methodology. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 14(10):1931–1941. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-1931-2010
Emdad MR, Raine SR, Smith RJ, Fardad H (2004) Effect of water quality on soil structure and infiltration under furrow irrigation. Irrig Sci 23:55–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-004-0093-y
Güler I, Übeyli ED (2005) Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for classification of EEG signals using wavelet coefficients. J Neurosci Methods 148:113–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2005.04.013
Heddam S, Bermad A, Dechemi N (2012) ANFIS-based modeling for coagulant dosage in drinking water treatment plant: a case study. Environ Monit Assess 184(4):1953–1971. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-2091-x
Jang J-S (1993) ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 23:665–685. https://doi.org/10.1109/21.256541
Karimi S, Jabbarian Amiri B, Malekian A (2019) Similarity metrics-based uncertainty analysis of river water quality models. Water Resour Manag:An International Journal - Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA) 33(6):1927–1945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02205-y
Keikhosravi MS, Masoodian SA, Balling RC, Svoma BM (2017) Spatial and temporal variations of snow cover in the Karun River Basin, Iran,2003–2015. Water 9(965):1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9120965
Kohonen T (1984) Self-organization, and associative memory. Springer-Verlag, New York
Krause P, Boyle D, Base F (2005) Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment. Adv Geosci J 5:89–97. https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-5-89-2005
Maier HR, Jain A, Dandy GC, Sudheer KP (2010) Methods used for the development of neural networks for the prediction of water resource variables in river systems: current status and future directions. Environ Model Softw 25:891–909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.02.003
Mathevet T, Michel C, Andreassian V, Perrin C (2006) Abounded version of Nash-Sutcliffe criterion for better model assessment on large sets of basins, large sample basin experiments for hydrological model parameterization results of the model parameter experiment- MOPEX IAHS Publ 307.2006
Mirzaei M, Jafari A, Gholamalifard M, Azadi H, Shooshtari S J, Moghaddam S M, Gebrehiwot K, Witlox F (2019) Mitigating environmental risks: modeling the interaction of water quality parameters and land use cover. Land use policy In Press https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.12.014
Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I-A discussion of principles J. Hydro. 27(3):282–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6
Qdais HA, Hani KB, Shatnawi N (2010) Modeling and optimization of biogas production from a waste digester using artificial neural network and genetic algorithm. Resour Conserv Recycl 54:359–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.08.012
Sajedi-Hosseini F, Malekian A, Choubin B, Rahmati O, Cipullo S, Coulon F (2018) Pradhan B (2018)A novel machine learning-based approach for the risk assessment of nitrate groundwater contamination. Sci Total Environ 644:954–962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.054
Salahi A, Mohammadi T, Behbahani RM, Hemmati M (2015) Asymmetric polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes for oily wastewater treatment: synthesis, characterization, ANFIS modeling, and performance. J Environ Chem Eng 3:170–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2014.10.021
Sattari MT, Frkhondeh A, Patrick Abraham J (2018) Estimation of sodium adsorption ratio indicator using data mining method: a case study in Urmia Lake. Environ Sci PolluRes 255:4776–4786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0844-y
Sattari MT, Feizi H, Colak MS, Ozturk A, Apaydin H, Ozturk F (2020) Estimation of sodium adsorption ratio in a river with kernel-based and decision-tree models. Environ Monit Assess 192:575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08506-9
Shainberg I, Lete J (1984) The response of soils to sodic and saline conditions. Hilgardia 52(2):21–57. https://doi.org/10.3733/hilg.v52n02p057
Singh B (2019) Prediction of sodium absorption rate using the data-driven model: a case study in Iran. Ecol Landscapes 4:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/24749508.2019.1568129
Sivanandam SN, Sumathi S, Deepa SN (2007) Introduction to fuzzy logic using MATLAB. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg
Song XM (1996) Radial basis function networks for empirical modeling of the chemical process. University of Helsinki, MSc thesis
Suarez DL, Wood JD, Lesch S (2008) Infiltration into cropped soils: Effect of rain and sodium adsorption ratio impacted irrigation water. J Environ Qual 37(5):169–179. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2007.0468
The Math Works I (2018) Fuzzy logic toolbox user’s guide. Natick, New York
Wali WA, Al-Shamma'a AI, Hassan KH, Cullen JD (2012) Online genetic-ANFIS temperature control for advanced microwave biodiesel reactor. J Process Control 22:1256–1272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2012.05.013
Willmott C, Matsuura K (2005) Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing average model performance. Climate Research J 30:79–82. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr030079
Wu W, Dandy GC, Maier HR (2014) Protocol for developing ANN models and its application to the assessment of the quality of the ANN model development process in drinking water quality modeling. Environ Model Soft J 54:108–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.12.016
Yaseen ZM, Ramal MM, Diop L, Jaafar O, Demir V, Kisi O (2018) Hybrid adaptive neuro-fuzzy models for water quality index estimation. Water Resour Manag 32:2227–2245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-1915-7
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Broder J. Merkel
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rahnama, E., Bazrafshan, O. & Asadollahfardi, G. Application of data-driven methods to predict the sodium adsorption rate (SAR) in different climates in Iran. Arab J Geosci 13, 1160 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-06146-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-06146-4