Elsevier

Precambrian Research

Volume 48, Issue 3, October 1990, Pages 195-202
Precambrian Research

Preface
Majorite fractionation and genesis of komatiites in the deep mantle

https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-9268(90)90008-EGet rights and content

Abstract

Melting experiments of the primitive mantle indicate that majorite fractionation is the key process to determine the geochemical nature of magmas generated in the deep upper mantle and the transition zone. A model of petrogenesis of komatiite magma is presented by using the melting relations of the primitive mantle and the partitioning data of lithophile elements between majorite and the liquid. Alumina-depleted komatiite, generally observed in the early Archean, can be generated by any degree of partial melting at depths from 450 to 650 km. This type of komatiite is also generated by a relatively low degree of partial melting at depths from 180 to 450 km. Alumina-enriched komatiite can be generated by remelting of the residual mantle after separation of alumina-depleted komatiite. Alumina-undepleted komatiite generally observed in the late Archean can not be formed by a low degree of partial melting of the primitive mantle at any depths. This type of komatiite can be generated only by a high degree of partial melting of the mantle at the depths shallower than 450 km. As an alternative model, the alumina-depleted komatiite can be formed by a high degree of partial melting of the Archean upper mantle depleted in majorite. Such heterogeneity in the Archean upper mantle was generated by a global melting event succeeding the accretion of the earth, and erased by convection by the later Archean. Hf-isotope data seem to favour the former model of the petrogenesis of komatiite, i.e., single stage melting of the primitive mantle at various depths.

References (26)

  • T. Irifune et al.

    Phase transformations in primitive MORB and pyrolite compositions to 25 GPa and some geophysical implications

  • E. Ito et al.

    Melting of peridotite at uppermost lower mantle conditions

    Nature

    (1987)
  • E. Jagoutz et al.

    The abundance of major, minor and trace elements in the earth's mantle as derived from ultramafic nodules

  • Cited by (49)

    • <sup>182</sup>W and HSE constraints from 2.7 Ga komatiites on the heterogeneous nature of the Archean mantle

      2018, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
      Citation Excerpt :

      Due to the rather wide geographical distribution and specific geochemical features of these lavas, Barley et al. (2000) coined the term Karasjok-type komatiites after the locality in Norway where they were first described by Barnes and Often (1990). The majority of models proposed to account for the origin of the Karasjok-type komatiites (Capdevila et al., 1999; Tomlinson et al., 1999; Barley et al., 2000) involve deep, high-degree anhydrous melting in mantle plumes in equilibrium with residual majorite garnet, typical of Al-depleted komatiites (Ohtani, 1984, 1990; Herzberg and Ohtani, 1988). This is consistent with estimates of the pressure of melting for the BCF to be between 10 and 14 GPa (Herzberg and O'Hara, 2002), which is similar to that of the Barberton komatiites.

    • Earth's Oldest Rocks

      2018, Earth's Oldest Rocks
    • Petrogenesis of 3.15 Ga old Banasandra komatiites from the Dharwar craton, India: Implications for early mantle heterogeneity

      2017, Geoscience Frontiers
      Citation Excerpt :

      In this modelling the residue is taken to be garnet free indicating that the melting is at pressures lower than 5 GPa (Takahashi and Scarfe, 1985) where garnet is not a stable phase. However, this does not preclude the possibility of earlier episodes of melting at deeper depths leaving garnet as residue, consistent with the suggestion that AUK are generated after extraction of ADK in Archean (Ohtani, 1990; Robin-Popieul et al., 2012). We do see contribution of the deeper melts in our samples in terms of slight negative trend of (Gd/Yb)N versus Al2O3/TiO2.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text