Geophysical models for the tectonic framework of the Lake Vostok region, East Antarctica
Introduction
East Antarctica, the size of the conterminous United States, remains the largest unexplored part of the Earth’s crust. Our present understanding of the tectonic development of East Antarctica is mostly derived from remote sensing information and from the geological record as preserved in sparse rock outcrops along the perimeter of the Antarctic continent (Fig. 1). Knowledge of geological structures from the surrounding continents, such as Australia, southern Africa, and South America, complements the limited geologic information of East Antarctica. To date, geophysical mapping of the ice-covered continent’s interior was limited to reconnaissance expeditions during the International Geophysical Year in 1957, isolated over-ice traverses, and aerogeophysical profiling projects funded by the United States, the United Kingdom, Denmark, and Russia during the 1970s (e.g. [1]). Progress towards a detailed structural framework of East Antarctica is slow because of its remoteness and harsh climatic conditions.
The East Antarctic craton formed part of the Paleozoic/Mesozoic supercontinent Gondwana until the middle Jurassic to Cretaceous breakup of Africa, East Antarctica, India and Australia (e.g. [2], [3]). Sparse outcrops along the perimeter consist of mainly Precambrian metamorphic and intrusive rocks (e.g. [4] and references herein). Evidence for post-breakup tectonic activity in the interior of the Precambrian East Antarctic craton is not known (e.g. [5]). The East Antarctic craton is generally considered to be aseismic, although the large East Antarctic ice sheet may suppress seismic activity. Seismometer distribution within the Antarctic continent is also a problem. Within the interior of East Antarctica the most prominent subglacial landforms are the Gamburtsev Subglacial Mountains with peaks ranging up to 3500 m, and the Aurora Subglacial Basin at −1000 m (Fig. 1). Midway between these two physiographic features is Lake Vostok, the largest subglacial lake on Earth. The tectonic framework of the Lake Vostok region was the focus of a geophysical survey carried out during the austral summer of 2000/01. The data set consists of broadband seismic recordings and aerogeophysical measurements. The aerogeophysical data include gravity, magnetics, ice-penetrating radar and laser altimeter measurements. The nearest rock outcrops to our study area are over 800 km away in the Transantarctic Mountains and 1200 km along the coast (Fig. 1). Our goal is to derive a conceptual tectonic model for the Lake Vostok region based on geophysical data.
Section snippets
Data sets
The aerogeophysical data were acquired by the US National Science Foundation’s Support Office for Aerogeophysical Research (SOAR) using a ski-equipped De Havilland Twin Otter aircraft as survey platform. The survey consisted of a main grid for detailed mapping of the subglacial lake (discussed in [6]) and 12 regional lines, extending well outside of the main grid between 180 and 440 km (Fig. 2). The extent of the regional lines was limited by the range of the survey aircraft. Flight elevations
Geophysical constraints on the crustal structure of the Lake Vostok region
Previous models for the crustal and lithospheric structure of East Antarctica have been derived from teleseismic body waves and the dispersion of surface waves (e.g. [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]). The radial and lateral resolutions of these studies are poor (≥2°×2°) because of a lack of both permanent seismic observatories and intraplate seismicity within East Antarctica. The closest teleseismic sources are located along the Antarctic plate margin. Inversion of satellite gravity measurements
Conceptual tectonic models from gravity modelling
The regional gravity anomaly plays an important role in understanding the nature of the boundary beneath Lake Vostok. The gravity of the entire region is characterized by a positive–negative dipole, with the maximum just to the east of the lake and the minimum 150–250 km west of the lake (Fig. 6, Fig. 7). Superimposed on this long wavelength anomaly is an intermediate wavelength positive anomaly immediately west of Lake Vostok. A third characteristic of the observed gravity is a narrow minimum
Seismic activity
The broadband seismic data include the first-ever proximal recording of an earthquake and aftershock in the interior of East Antarctica. Prior to these events, only three earthquakes had been reported in the vicinity of Lake Vostok [29] (Fig. 1, Fig. 2). Near-absent seismicity, however, might be an artifact of the biased distribution of recording stations on the continent. In addition, continental ice sheets also have a tendency to suppress seismic activity [30]. On January 5, 2001, we recorded
Conclusions
Analysis of a recent geophysical survey in the interior of East Antarctica suggests a possible tectonic boundary along the eastern margin of Lake Vostok. We have developed a conceptual tectonic model for the Lake Vostok region that is consistent with the geophysical constraints from three independent data sets: seismological, magnetic, and gravimetric. A distinct change in the aeromagnetic anomaly across Lake Vostok defines a westward dipping boundary between two major crustal blocks. Depth to
Acknowledgements
We thank the Support Office for Aerogeophysical Research for acquisition and reduction of the aerogeophysical data. Ron Sweeney, Vicky Rystrom and Carol Finn (USGS, Denver) helped reducing the magnetic data. Christian Müller (Alfred Wegener Institute) and Wen-Xuan ‘Wayne’ Du (Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory) helped locating the earthquake. Won-Young Kim, the Lamont-Doherty Cooperative Seismographic Network, and the PASSCAL Instrument Center provided equipment for the seismic survey. Art
References (41)
A review of tectonic events in the East Antarctic Shield and their implications for Gondwana and earlier supercontinents
J. Afr. Earth Sci.
(2000)- et al.
Ice cover, landscape setting, and geological framework of Lake Vostok, East Antarctica
Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.
(2003) - et al.
Numerical modelling of lithosphere shortening; application to the Laramide orogenic province, western USA
Tectonophysics
(1993) - C.R. Bentley, Configuration and structure of the subglacial crust, in: R.J. Tingey (Ed.), The Geology of Antarctica,...
- C. Craddock, Antarctica and Gondwanaland, in: C. Craddock (Ed.), Antarctic Geoscience, International Union of...
- R.J. Tingey, The Geology of Antarctica, Oxford University Press, Oxford,...
Tectonics of Antarctica; a review
Am. J. Sci. Tecton. Mt. Ranges
(1975)- T.G. Richter, J.W. Holt, D.D. Blankenship, Airborne Gravimetry over the Antarctic Ice Sheet, in: International...
Eötvös corrections for airborne gravimetry
J. Geophys. Res.
(1968)- G. Roult, D. Rouland, J.P. Montagner, Antarctica II; Upper-mantle structure from velocities and anisotropy, In: J.P....
CRUST 5.1: A global crustal model at 5 degrees×5 degrees
J. Geophys. Res.-Solid Earth
Structure of the upper mantle under the Antarctic Plate from surface wave tomography
Geophys. Res. Lett.
Crustal and upper mantle structure beneath Antarctica and surrounding oceans
J. Geophys. Res. B Solid Earth Planets
Antarctic crustal modeling from the spectral correlation of free-air gravity anomalies with the terrain
J. Geophys. Res.-Solid Earth
Modeling crustal structure through use of converted phases in teleseismic body-wave forms
Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.
Receiver functions from multiple-taper spectral correlation estimates
Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.
P-SH conversions in a flat-layered medium with anisotropy of arbitrary orientation
Geophys. J. Int.
The temperature dependence of seismic waves in ice
J. Glaciol.
Cited by (81)
Antarctica ice sheet basal melting enhanced by high mantle heat
2022, Earth-Science ReviewsCitation Excerpt :The anomaly is constrained by a limited dataset (Supplementary Fig. S1) and its lateral extent is unknown due to poor seismic coverage for the Moho depth, which is based on interpolations in the eastern and southern directions from Lake Vostok (Supplementary Fig. S4). Based on a joint analysis of aeromagnetic, gravity and seismic receiver-function data, the Lake Vostok region was interpreted as a 400-km-wide, more than 10-km-deep sedimentary basin with the Moho at a ca. 30 km depth (Studinger et al., 2003). Compared to a typical cratonic crust with a ca. 40 km thick crystalline basement, the inferred crustal structure at the Lake Vostok region suggests a ca. 50% crustal thinning, consistent with the calculated strong lithosphere thinning (Fig. 3).
Cenozoic extension along the reactivated Aurora Fault System in the East Antarctic Craton
2017, TectonophysicsCitation Excerpt :The assumed depth of the basal detachment of the Aurora Fault is about 34 km, possibly corresponding to the base of the crust and is similar to the proposed depth of basal detachment of the Vostok and Adventure Faults (Cianfarra and Salvini, 2013; Cianfarra and Salvini, 2016a). At the same depth Studinger et al. (2003) on the basis of gravity data modelling, placed in the Vostok area a density contrast corresponding to the crust-mantle boundary. The Aurora Fault System overprints Precambrian tectonic boundaries representing a weakness corridor during successive Phanerozoic tectonics.
- 1
Present address: Ocean Research Institute, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 164-8639, Japan.