Variations in sediment properties, Skeffling mudflat, Humber Estuary, UK
Introduction
The stability of intertidal cohesive sediments is influenced by a large number of interacting physical and biological parameters (Paterson, 1997; Burt et al., 1997; Black et al., 1998b; Black and Paterson, 1998a). In many natural intertidal systems, biological activity can be the primary control on sediment stability with variation in stability directly linked to spatial and temporal variation in benthic biota (Kornman and de Deckere, 1998; Widdows et al., 1998; Paterson, 1989; Sutherland et al., 1998; Tolhurst et al., 1999). The natural variation or “patchiness” of benthic systems can vary at several spatial scales (Reise, 1985; Thrush, 1991) and recognition of the potential importance of small-scale variation led to the development of techniques and devices capable of measuring the variation of properties (Black & Paterson, 1997; Harper et al., 1997; Wiltshire et al., 1997; Taylor and Paterson, 1998; Black et al., 1999). Cone penetrometry and other surrogate methods (Hansbo, 1957; Kravitz, 1970) have been used to determine sediment stability while some in situ erosion devices, such as the Cohesive Strength Meter (CSM) system (Paterson, 1989; Tolhurst et al., 1999) are capable of measuring small-scale spatial and temporal variation in sediment stability. These techniques can now be combined to relate physical and biochemical parameters at similar scales for the first time. It has been shown that micro-scale analysis of biochemical and sediment properties reveals information missed by coarse sampling methods (Davison et al., 1997; Wheatcroft and Butman, 1997) and that related correlations can be improved (Paterson et al., 1998). This paper examines the relationship between biological and physical parameters and sediment stability over an intertidal transect on the Humber Estuary and includes examination of the bed forms, crest/trough formation characteristic of some stations (Black and Paterson, 1998a; Dyer, 1998). Measurements of biochemical sediment properties were made on two spatial scales (μm and mm) to determine which was most relevant to sediment stability.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
The Skeffling mudflat on the Humber estuary is about 5 km wide with a 1 : 1000 slope with a tidal range of about 6 m. Details of the site and the stations used can be found in Black and Paterson (1998a) and Dyer (1998). Measurements of sediment properties were made at four stations A, B, C and D located 200, 580, 1550 and 2180 m from the shore, respectively. A crest/trough system of bedforms develops seawards of station A, covering a large proportion of the mudflats, only the extreme upper shore
Macrobenthos
Two species, Macoma balthica and Streblospio shrubsolii were found at all stations (Table 1). High densities of Oligochaeta were found at stations A and B. Nereis diversicolor and Retusa alba were the dominant predators at these stations, while Nephtys hombergii was dominant at stations C and D. The total density and number of species decreased along the transect from station A to D. The biomass also decreased towards the sea. Biomass was dominated by three species: Macoma balthica, Nereis
Correlation with erosion threshold
Only cryolander Chl a was significantly correlated with the erosion threshold (Table 2). This suggests that the photosynthetic biomass (diatoms) was significant in controlling sediment stability. From the literature (Holland et al., 1974; Yallop et al., 1994; Paterson, 1997), the secretion of EPS would be the expected mechanism for this effect. The total EPS content of the sediments was not measured but only the colloidal form that has been shown to represent diatom biomass most strongly (
Conclusion
This study has shown that the temporal and spatial variability of sediment properties (stability, erosion rate) on a macro- and micro-scale are clearly significant. This variation is related to sediment bedform and is influenced by the organisms inhabiting the bed. In addition, there is a clear temporal signal that can be affected by local climatic conditions (e.g. rain). Rain reduces sediment stability and therefore the variation between bedform features. However, this effect was short-lived
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by the European Commission Mast 3 programme under the “INTRMUD” award (MAS3-CT95-0022). The participation of T.J. Tolhurst was under the auspices of a studentship award from the University of St Andrews. The work of Prof. K. Dyer in co-ordination of the INTRMUD project was much appreciated and the valuable comments of Dr. C. Amos and two anonymous reviewers on the manuscript.
References (33)
- et al.
Microspatial variation in carbohydrate concentrations with depth in the upper millimetres of intertidal cohesive sediments
Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science
(1998) Spatial patterns in soft-bottom communities
Trends in Ecology and Evolution
(1991)- et al.
Measuring the in situ erosion shear stress of intertidal sediments with the Cohesive Strength Meter (CSM)
Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science
(1999) - et al.
A comparison and measurement standardisation of four in situ devices for determining the erosion shear stress of intertidal sediments
Continental Shelf Research
(2000) - et al.
Spatial and temporal variability in aggregated grain-size distributions, with implications for sediment dynamics
Continental Shelf Research
(1997) - et al.
Comparative structure, primary production and biogenic stabilization of cohesive and non-cohesive marine sediments inhabited by microphytobenthos
Estuarine, Coastal Shelf Science
(1994) - et al.
Measurement of the erosion potential of cohesive marine sedimentsa review of current in situ technology
Journal of Marine Environmental Engineering
(1997) - et al.
LISP-UK Littoral Investigation of sediment properties. An introduction
- Black, K.S., Paterson, D.M., Cramp, A., 1998b. Sedimentary Processes in the Intertidal Zone. Geological Society,...
- et al.
Sediment micro-fabric of oil rig drill spoil heapspreliminary observations using low-temperature scanning electron microscopy
Environmental Science and Technology
(1999)
Dissolved metals in surface sediment and a microbial mat at 100 μm resolution
Nature
Cryoscanning electron microscopy and high resolution scanning electron microscopy of organic matter and organomineral associations in modern microbial sediments
Geomaterials, Petrology and Sedimentology
Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances
Analytical Chemistry
The typology of intertidal mudflats
A new approach to the determination of the shear strength of clay by the fall-cone test. Proceedings of the Royal Swedish
Geotechnology Institute
Cited by (143)
Shear strength and erosion resistance of salt marsh substrates: Which method to use?
2023, Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf ScienceSeasonal changes in sediment erodibility associated with biostabilization in a subarctic intertidal environment, St. Lawrence Estuary, Canada
2020, Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf ScienceCitation Excerpt :Testing different grain size parameters (mean and median particle size, and sand, silt, clay, or mud (silt + clay) fractions) did not improve this relationship, which was similar for another dataset taken in summer 2016 in the same marsh (Waqas et al., 2019). These findings are unlike several studies in which particle size was correlated to sediment erodibility, using mean/median grain size (Paterson et al., 2000; Grabowski et al., 2012; Jesse et al., 1998), clay (Grabowski et al., 2010), or mud content (Dickhudt et al., 2011). For example, Dickhudt et al. (2009) found a positive correlation between τcrit and mud volume fraction for estuarine sediments.
The heterogeneity of mudflat erodibility
2019, GeomorphologyCitation Excerpt :Other studies have used an alternative approach: an undisturbed sediment core is placed in an erosion device, and a controlled forcing is imposed on the sediment surface (e.g., Gust and Morris, 1989; Schünemann and Kühl, 1993; Austen et al., 1999; Bohling, 2009; Dickhudt et al., 2009; van Maren et al., 2009). In addition, in situ annular flumes have been used directly on sediment beds (Amos et al., 1992; McNeil et al., 1996; Widdows et al., 1998; Houwing, 1999; Tolhurst et al., 1999; Paterson et al., 2000; Neumeier et al., 2006; Ravens, 2007). These devices aimed to determine the resuspension characteristics, but were always difficult to operate and time-consuming (Le Hir et al., 2008).
Coupling between tidal mudflats and salt marshes affects marsh morphology
2019, Marine GeologyFactors affecting the spatial and temporal distribution of E. coli in intertidal estuarine sediments
2019, Science of the Total Environment