Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Changes in frequency–size relationship from small to large earthquakes

Abstract

THE constant 'b value' observed in frequency–magnitude distributions of earthquakes has been taken as an indication of self-similarity at all magnitudes. Hence, earthquake properties should scale uniformly in the same way from small to large earthquakes. It has often been observed, however, that the seismic moment released in small earthquakes scales differently with rupture length than it does for large events1,2, where the crossover between small and large events is defined at a rupture dimension equal to the down-dip width of the seismogenic zone. A possible explanation for this contradiction is that frequency–size distributions are biased by small earthquakes. Small events dominate most global earthquake catalogues because of the short time-period covered. Another source of bias in size distributions is the saturation of earthquake magnitudes for large events. Here we correct biases in calculations of b values and present evidence for a change in b value in frequency–size distributions. We find that a break in self-similarity, from small to large earthquakes, occurs at a point where the dimension of the event equals the down-dip width of the seismogenic layer.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Scholz, C. H. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 72, 1–14 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shimazaki, K. in Earthquake Source Mechanics. AGU Geophys. Monogr. 37 (eds Das, S., Boatwright, J. & Scholz, C.) 209–216 (American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gutenberg, B. & Richter, C. Seismicity of the Earth and Associated Phenomena, 2nd edn, 310 (Princeton University Press, 1956).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rydelek, P. A. & Sacks, I. S. Nature 337, 251–253 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Boatwright, J. & Choy, G. J. geophys. Res. 94, 15541–15553 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rundle, J. B. J. geophys. Res. 94, 12337–12342 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pacheco, J. F. & Sykes, L. R. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. (submitted).

  8. Abe, K. Phys. Earth planet. Inter. 27, 72–92 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Press, W., Flannery, B., Teukolsky, S. & Vetterling, W. Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing, 735 (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1988).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Geller, R. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 66, 1501–1523 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Akaike, H. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control AC-19, 716–723 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rundle, J. B. & Kanamori, H. J. geophys. Res. 92, 2606–2616 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kanamori, H. & Anderson, D. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 65, 1073–1095 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sykes, L. R. J. geophys. Res. 76, 8021–8041 (1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sykes, L. R. & Quittmeyer, R. C. Earthquake Prediction: An International Review, Maurice Ewing Ser. 4 (eds Simpson, D. & Richards, P.) 217–247 (American Geophysical Union, Washington DC, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Frohlich, C. Ann. Rev. Earth planet. Sci. 17, 227–254 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Marone, C. & Scholz, C. Geophys. Res. Lett. 15, 621–624 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Chinnery, M. A. & North, R. G. Science 190, 1197–1198 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Davison, F. & Scholz, C. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 75, 1349–1362 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Scholz, C. H. in Spontaneous Formation of Space-Time Structures and Criticality (eds Riste, T. & Sherrington, D.) 41–56 (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1991).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pacheco, J., Scholz, C. & Sykes, L. Changes in frequency–size relationship from small to large earthquakes. Nature 355, 71–73 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1038/355071a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/355071a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing