Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T17:33:35.663Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Geological age by instrumental analysis: the 29th Hallimond Lecture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

W. Compston
W. Compston*
Affiliation:
Research School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The need in geology for in situ U-Pb age determinations of minerals is illustrated by two examples: the internal age dispersion developed within the zircon SL13 shortly after original crystallization, and the occurrence within minerals of old cores and later overgrowths. SL13 contains rare μm-sized patches of unsupported radiogenic Pb and a mainly bimodal distribution of 206Pb/238U ages otherwise. Both observations are consistent with original crystallization at 580 Ma and Pb loss at 565 Ma. Age precision is controlled by the ions counted for radiogenic Pb, and varies with instrumental sensitivity, age and U contents of the target. Laser-ablation ICPMS has similar spatial resolution and sensitivity to SIMS but consumes more sample because of much greater hole-depth in practice. Like SIMS, the measured Pb+/U+ is biased and also changes with depth so comparison with a standard mineral is necessary. Analyses of reference zircons reported here indicate that the reproducibility of Pb/U ages by ICPMS is limited by residual bias, not ion counting errors. For multipurpose ICPMS at least, the Hg background at mass 204 prohibits the measurement of 204Pb for common Pb estimation. A third micro-analytical method, ‘CHIME’, and future developments in SIMS and ICPMS are discussed briefly.

Keywords

zirconage determinationSIMSICPMS
Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 63 , Issue 3 , June 1999 , pp. 297 - 311
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bowles, J.F.W. (1990) Age dating of individual grains of uraninite in rocks from electron microprobe analyses. Chem. Geol., 83, 47–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chappell, B.W., and White, A.J.R. (1974) Two contrasting granite types. Pacific Geol., 8, 173–4.Google Scholar
Compston, W., Williams, I.S. and Meyer, C. (1984) U- Pb geochronology of zircons from lunar breccia 73217 using a sensitive high mass-resolution ion microprobe. Proc. 14th Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf.: J. Geophys. Res. 89, B525–34.Google Scholar
Claoué-Long, J.C., Compston, W., Roberts, J. and Fanning, C.M. (1996) Two carboniferous ages: a comparison of SHRIMP zircon dating with conventional zircon ages and 40Ar/39Ar analysis. SEPM Special Publication.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eldridge, S., Compston, W., Williams, I.S., Walshe, J.L. and Both, R.A. (1987) In situ microanalysis for 34S/32S using the ion microprobe SHRIMP. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. and Ion Processes, 76, 65–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, A.N., Lee, D.-C., Christensen, J.N., Rahkämper, M., Yi, W., Luo, Z., Hall, C.M., Ballentine, C.J., Pettke, T. and Stirling, C. (1998 a) Applications of multiple collector ICPMS to cosmochemistry, geochemistry and paleoceanography. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 62, 919–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, A.N., Christensen, J.N., Lee, D.-C., Rahkämper, M., Hall, C.M., and Luo, X. (1998 b) Multiple Collector ICP-MS. Inorganic Mass Spectrometry: Fundamentals and Applications. (Barshick, C.B., Duckworth, D.C. and Smith, D.H., eds). Marcel Dekker Inc. New York (in press).Google Scholar
Lee, J.K.W., Williams, I.S. and Ellis, D.J. (1997) Pb, U and Th diffusion in natural zircon. Nature, 390, 159–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattinson, J.M., Graubard, C.M., Parkinson, D.L. and McClelland, W.C. (1996) U-Pb Reverse Discordance in Zircons: the role of fine-scale oscillatory zoning and sub-micron transport of Pb. Earth Processes: Reading the Isotopic Code. Geophysical Monograph 95, 355–370. American Geophysical Union.Google Scholar
Montel, J.-M., Foret, S., Veschambre, M., Nicollet, C. and Provost, A. (1996) Electron microprobe dating of monazite. Chem. Geol., 131, 37–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paces, J.B. and Miller, J.D. (1989) Precise U-Pb ages of the Duluth Complex and related mafic intrusions. J. Geophys. Res., 98B, 13997–4013.Google Scholar
Sambridge, M.S. and Compston, W. (1994) Mixture modelling of zircon ages. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 128, 373–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverman, B.W. (1986) Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Chapman & Hall, London, 175 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, K. (1987) Discordant distribution of U and Pb in zircon of Naegi granite: a possible indication of Rn migration through radiation damage. Geochem. J., 21, 173–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, K. and Adachi, M. (1991) The South Kitakami terrane, Northeast Japan, revealed by the chemical Th-U-total Pb isochron ages of monazite, zircon and xenotime. Geochem. J., 25, 357–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, K., Adachi, M. and Tanaka, T. (1991) Middle Precambrian provenance of Jurassic sandstone in the Mino Terrane, central Japan: Th-U-total Pb evidence from an electron microprobe monazite study. Sedim. Geol., 75, 141–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, I.S. (1992) Some observations on the use of zircon U-Pb geochronology in the study of granitic rocks. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh, 83, 447–58.Google Scholar