Skip to main content
Log in

Cadmium and arsenic adsorption in aqueous systems in the presence of monosilicic acid

  • Published:
Moscow University Soil Science Bulletin Aims and scope

Abstract

The effect of different concentrations of monosilicic acid on the sorption capacity of quartz sand, diatomite, zeolite, and brown coal with respect to cadmium and arsenic has been studied in laboratory conditions. The applicability of different adsorption models, including exponential, semilogarithmic, and linear dependences, as well as the Langmuir and Freundlich equations, has been compared. An increase in monosilicic acid concentration from 0 to 2 mM increased the sorption capacity of all materials. It has been suggested that either the interaction of monosilicic acid with a pollutant takes place directly in the solution followed by sorption of the reaction products on the surface or in the pores of the sorbent, or first adsorption of the monosilicic acid by the sorbent occurs followed by interaction of the sorbed silicic acid with cadmium and arsenic; it is also possible that both process proceed in parallel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aptikaev, R.S., Arsenic compounds in soils of nature and anthropogenic landscapes, Cand. Sci. (Biol.) Dissertation, Moscow, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vodyanitskii, Yu.N., Arsenic transformations in polluted soils, Agrokhimiya, 2013, no.4.

  3. Vodyanitskii, Yu.N., Natural and technogenic compounds of heavy metals in soil, Eurasian Soil Sci., 2014, vol. 47, no.4.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Vodyanitskii, Yu.N., Ladonin, D.V., and Savichev, A.T., Zagryaznenie pochv tyazhelymi metallami (Soil Pollution by Heavy Metals), Moscow, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goncharuk, V.V., Soboleva, N.M., and Nosonovich, A.A., Physicochemical aspects of soil and hydrosphere pollution by heavy metals, Khim. Interesah Ustoich. Razvit., 2003, vol. 11, no.6.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ladonin, D.V., Heavy metal compounds in soil: problems and methods of study, Eurasian Soil Sci., 2002, vol. 35, no.6.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ladonin, D.V., The effect of iron and clay minerals on the adsorption of copper, zinc, lead, and cadmium in the nodular horizon of podzolic soil, Eurasian Soil Sci., 2003, vol. 36, no.10.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Motuzova, G.V., Aptikaev, R.S., and Karpova, E.A., Fractionation of soil arsenic compounds, Eurasian Soil Sci., 2006, vol. 39, no.4.

    Google Scholar 

  9. SanPiN (Sanitary Regulations) no. 2.1.4.1074-01: Drinking Water. Hygienic Norms for Water Quality of Centralized Drinking Water Supply Systems. Quality Control, Moscow: Minist. Health Russ. Fed., 2015.

  10. Arsenic: Environmental Chemistry, Health Threats and Waste Treatment, Kevin, H.K., Ed., Chichester, 2009.

  11. Bocharnikova, E.A. and Matichenkov, V.V., Influence of plant association on the silicon cycle in the soil-plant ecosystem, Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res., 2012, vol. 10, no.4.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Contaminant geochemistry and Kd values, in Understanding Variation in Partition Coefficient, Kd, Values, vol. 2: Geochemistry and Available Kd Values for Selected Inorganic Contaminants, Washington: U.S. Environ. Prot. Agency, 1999, ch.5.

  13. Conway, G.R. and Pretty, J.N., Unwelcome Harvest: Agriculture and Pollution, London, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dresler, S., Wojcik, M., Bednarek, W., et al., The effect of silicon on maize growth under cadmium stress, Rus. J. Plant Physiol., 2015, vol. 62, no. 1. doi 10.1007/ s11270-012-1378-z

    Google Scholar 

  15. Esfahani, A.R., Firouzi, A.F., Sayyad, G., and Kiasat, A., Isotherm study of cadmium adsorption onto stabilizedzerovalent iron nanoparticles, Agron. Plant Prod., 2013, vol. 4, no.12.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Frimmel, F.H. and Huber, L., Influence of humic substances on the aquatic adsorption of heavy metals on defined mineral phases, Environ. Int., 1996, vol. 22, no. 5. doi 10.1016/0160-4120(96)00040-2

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jordan, N., Lomenech, C., Marmier, N., et al., Sorption of selenium (IV) onto magnetite in the presence of silicic acid, Colloid Interface Sci., 2009, vol. 329, no. 1. doi 10.1016/j.jcis.2008.09.052

    Google Scholar 

  18. Komárek, M., Vanek, A., and Ettler, V., Chemical stabilization of metals and arsenic in contaminated soils using oxides -a review, Environ. Pollut., 2013, vol. 172, pp. 9–22. doi 10.1016/j.envpol.2012.07.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kumpiene, J., Lagerkvist, A., and Maurice, C., Stabilization of As, Cr, Cu, Pb and Zn in soil using amendments–a review, Waste Manage, 2008, vol. 28, no. 1. doi 10.1016/j.wasman.2006.12.012

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lindsay, W.L., Chemical Equilibria in Soil, New York, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mamindy-Pajany, Y., Hurel, C., Marmier, N., and Roméo, M., Arsenic (V) adsorption from aqueous solution onto goethite, hematite, magnetite and zero-valent iron: effects of pH, concentration and reversibility, Desalination, 2011, vol. 281, pp. 93–99. doi 10.1016/ j.desal.2011.07.046

    Google Scholar 

  22. McBride, M.B., Simon, T., Tam, G., and Wharton, S., Lead and arsenic uptake by leafy vegetables grown on contaminated soils: effects of mineral and organic amendments, Water, Air Soil Pollut., 2013, vol. 224, no. 1. doi 10.1007/s11270-012-1378-z

    Google Scholar 

  23. Moreno-Jiménez, E., Esteban, E., and Peñalosa, J.M., The fate of arsenic in soil-plant systems, Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 2012, vol. 215, pp. 1–37. doi 10.1007/978-1-4614-1463-6_1

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pehlivan, E. and Arslan, G., Comparison of adsorption capacity of young brown coals and humic acids prepared from different coal mines in Anatolia, Hazard. Mater., 2006, vol. 138, no. 2. doi 10.1016/j.jhazmat. 2006.05.063

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shaheen, S.M. and Tsadilas, C.D., Influence of fly ash and sewage sludge application on cadmium and lead sorption by an acidic Alfisol, Pedosphere, 2010, vol. 20, no. 4. doi 10.1016/S1002-0160(10)60033-1

    Google Scholar 

  26. Schindler, P.W., Furst, B., Dick, R., and Wolf, P.O., Ligand properties of surface silanol groups. I. Surface complex formation with Fe3+,Cu2+, Cd3+, and Pb2+, Colloid Interface Sci., 1976, vol. 55, no. 2. doi 10.1016/ 0021-9797(76)90057-6

    Google Scholar 

  27. Su, C. and Puls, R.W., Arsenate and arsenite removal by zerovalent iron: effects of phosphate, silicate, carbonate, borate, sulfate, chromate, molybdate, and nitrate, relative to chloride, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2001, vol. 35, no. 22. doi 10.1021/es010768z

    Google Scholar 

  28. Swedlund, P.J. and Webster, J.G., Adsorption and polymerization of silicic acid on ferrihydrite, and its effect on arsenic adsorption, Water Res., 1999, vol. 33, no. 16. doi 10.1016/S0043-1354(99)00055-X

    Google Scholar 

  29. Vaculik, M., Pavlovic, A., and Lux, A., Silicon alleviates cadmium toxicity by enhanced photosynthetic rate and modified bundle sheath’s cell chloroplasts ultrastructure in maize, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety, 2015, vol. 120, pp. 66–73. doi 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.05.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to X. Ji.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ji, X., Liu, S., Hua, P. et al. Cadmium and arsenic adsorption in aqueous systems in the presence of monosilicic acid. Moscow Univ. Soil Sci. Bull. 72, 199–206 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147687417050040

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147687417050040

Keywords

Navigation