Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/216646
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
SHARE CORE BASE | |
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE | |
Título: | Global Deep-Sea Biodiversity Research Trends Highlighted by Science Mapping Approach |
Autor: | Costa, Corrado; Fanelli, Emanuela CSIC ORCID; Marini, Simone; Danovaro, Roberto; Aguzzi, Jacopo CSIC ORCID | Palabras clave: | Deep-sea biodiversity Terms mapping Scopus, bibliometric VOSviewer Publications trend |
Fecha de publicación: | jun-2020 | Editor: | Frontiers Media | Citación: | Frontiers in Marine Science 7: 384 (2020) | Resumen: | The scientific literature available on deep-sea biodiversity is ample and covers a wide array of objectives, geographic areas, and topics. It also explores the links between ecosystem functioning and productivity as well as modeling, management, and exploitation. New statistical analytical tools now allow the comprehensive monitoring of the status of deep-sea research to highlight global research topics and their trends, which deserve further development and economic investments. Here, we used a science mapping approach to provide a global and systematic bibliometric synthesis of these current research topics and their trends to identify the size, growth, trajectory, and geographic distribution of scientific efforts as well as to highlight the emerging topics. A total of 1287 deep-sea biodiversity publications were retrieved from the Scopus database from 1993 to the present. Both established and emerging research topics were identified: (i) biogeochemical, microbial, and molecular analyses; (ii) biodiversity assessments; (iii) ecosystem conservation and management; and, finally, (iv) zoology and taxocoenosis. The temporal change in research activity (which was assessed by subdividing publications into blocks from 1993 to 2010 and 2011 to 2019) demonstrated that the ¿biogeochemical, microbial, and molecular analyses¿ cluster was not present from 1993 to 2010 since it was included in the cluster for ¿biodiversity assessments,¿ which it eventually diverged from in the following couple of decades. The United States took the dominant role in research, followed by the United Kingdom; Germany and France were also evidenced. China was particularly associated with the United States | Descripción: | 17 pages, 7 figures, supplementary material https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2020.00384/full#supplementary-material.-- All datasets generated for this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material | Versión del editor: | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00384 | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/216646 | DOI: | 10.3389/fmars.2020.00384 | Identificadores: | doi: 10.3389/fmars.2020.00384 e-issn: 2296-7745 |
Aparece en las colecciones: | (ICM) Artículos |
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Costa_et_al_2020.pdf | 4,64 MB | Unknown | Visualizar/Abrir | |
Costa_et_al_2020_Data_1.PDF | 244,81 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizar/Abrir | |
Costa_et_al_2020_Data_2.PDF | 328,11 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizar/Abrir | |
Costa_et_al_2020_Data_3.PDF | 6,86 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizar/Abrir |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
31
checked on 22-abr-2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
29
checked on 25-feb-2024
Page view(s)
138
checked on 27-abr-2024
Download(s)
317
checked on 27-abr-2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Altmetric
Este item está licenciado bajo una Licencia Creative Commons