Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/216646
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

Global Deep-Sea Biodiversity Research Trends Highlighted by Science Mapping Approach

AutorCosta, Corrado; Fanelli, Emanuela CSIC ORCID; Marini, Simone; Danovaro, Roberto; Aguzzi, Jacopo CSIC ORCID
Palabras claveDeep-sea biodiversity
Terms mapping
Scopus, bibliometric
VOSviewer
Publications trend
Fecha de publicaciónjun-2020
EditorFrontiers Media
CitaciónFrontiers in Marine Science 7: 384 (2020)
ResumenThe scientific literature available on deep-sea biodiversity is ample and covers a wide array of objectives, geographic areas, and topics. It also explores the links between ecosystem functioning and productivity as well as modeling, management, and exploitation. New statistical analytical tools now allow the comprehensive monitoring of the status of deep-sea research to highlight global research topics and their trends, which deserve further development and economic investments. Here, we used a science mapping approach to provide a global and systematic bibliometric synthesis of these current research topics and their trends to identify the size, growth, trajectory, and geographic distribution of scientific efforts as well as to highlight the emerging topics. A total of 1287 deep-sea biodiversity publications were retrieved from the Scopus database from 1993 to the present. Both established and emerging research topics were identified: (i) biogeochemical, microbial, and molecular analyses; (ii) biodiversity assessments; (iii) ecosystem conservation and management; and, finally, (iv) zoology and taxocoenosis. The temporal change in research activity (which was assessed by subdividing publications into blocks from 1993 to 2010 and 2011 to 2019) demonstrated that the ¿biogeochemical, microbial, and molecular analyses¿ cluster was not present from 1993 to 2010 since it was included in the cluster for ¿biodiversity assessments,¿ which it eventually diverged from in the following couple of decades. The United States took the dominant role in research, followed by the United Kingdom; Germany and France were also evidenced. China was particularly associated with the United States
Descripción17 pages, 7 figures, supplementary material https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2020.00384/full#supplementary-material.-- All datasets generated for this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material
Versión del editorhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00384
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/216646
DOI10.3389/fmars.2020.00384
Identificadoresdoi: 10.3389/fmars.2020.00384
e-issn: 2296-7745
Aparece en las colecciones: (ICM) Artículos




Ficheros en este ítem:
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

31
checked on 22-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

29
checked on 25-feb-2024

Page view(s)

138
checked on 27-abr-2024

Download(s)

317
checked on 27-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Este item está licenciado bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons