Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/263680 
Autor:innen: 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
1995
Quellenangabe: 
[Journal:] International Journal of Social Economics [ISSN:] 0306-8293 [Volume:] 22 [Issue:] 6 [Publisher:] Emerald Publishing [Place:] Bingley [Year:] 1995 [Pages:] 3-16
Verlag: 
Emerald Publishing, Bingley
Zusammenfassung: 
Economists are divided about population growth: the pessimism of neo-Malthusians contrasts strongly with the optimism of cornucopians. Despite their differences, both schools of thought reject economic orthodoxy and prefer evolutionary forms of theory. Their interpretations of evolution are different: the neo-Malthusians appeal to the entropy law, whereas the cornucopians emphasise human creativity expressed through markets. This paper argues that both schools are right to adopt an evolutionary outlook, but that they are too restrictive in their conception of evolution. A more complete evolutionary view, which allows properly for social institutions, could give a more balanced account of population growth.
Schlagwörter: 
population growth
neo-Malthusians
cornucopians
economic evolution
markets
institutions
JEL: 
B52
B53
J10
J11
Q56
Q57
DOI der veröffentlichten Version: 
Dokumentart: 
Article
Dokumentversion: 
Accepted Manuscript (Postprint)
Erscheint in der Sammlung:

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.