File(s) under permanent embargo
Retailers' use of shipping cost strategies: Free shipping or partitioned prices?
journal contribution
posted on 2012-04-01, 00:00 authored by T Frischmann, O Hinz, Bernd SkieraBernd SkieraThe Internet has radically reduced the cost of collecting and distributing information. Consequently, researchers initially predicted that the resulting price transparency would drive prices toward a single market price. However, this has largely not happened, partly because retailers use shipping costs to make prices less comparable. Using data on 517,048 offers of 895 retailers from a leading European price comparison site, we show that retailers pursue two different shipping cost strategies. Both strategies lead to higher gross product prices, which are the sum of net product price and shipping costs and thus try to capture consumer surplus. These strategies are conflicting, however, and target different consumer segments: Some retailers charge high shipping costs and thereby try to exploit consumers' biased perceptions of partitioned prices, while other retailers offer "free shipping" to attract consumers and exploit their so-called zero-risk bias. Consumers realize the lowest gross product prices by ordering at retailers that charge moderate shipping costs. © 2012 M.E. Sharpe, Inc. All rights reserved.
History
Journal
International Journal of Electronic CommerceVolume
16Issue
3Pagination
65 - 88Publisher DOI
ISSN
1086-4415Publication classification
C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal; C Journal articleCopyright notice
2012, M.E. SharpeUsage metrics
Keywords
Social SciencesScience & TechnologyTechnologyBusinessComputer Science, Software EngineeringBusiness & EconomicsComputer ScienceElectronic commercee-tailprice comparisonpricingshipping costsYOUR-OWN-PRICEELECTRONIC MARKETSE-COMMERCEINTERNETCONSUMERDISPERSIONBEHAVIORONLINECOMPETITIONDECISIONSInformation Systems
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC