Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://repository.uniminuto.edu/handle/10656/9259| Title: | Being and gift. Eckhart and Heidegger: desire nothing, knowing nothing, being nothing Ser y don. Eckhart y Heidegger: querer nada, saber nada, ser nada |
| Publisher: | Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios - UNIMINUTO |
| Description: | The article looks for identifying some points of confluence between the Eckhart and Heidegger thought and, in turn, identifying the influence of the first author in the second. Castañeda compares the approach made by both philosophers about ideas such as God and being and freedom.For both authors God as much as the being are unspeakable and unmentionable realities. However it is necessary to think about being and finding God but thinking about being is, in turn, thinking about nothing. In Eckhart and Heidegger God or being given means assuming an attitude of detachment and serenity in order to let secrets out, renounce to any desire, to shed of every thought and representative calculation. In this regard, both authors propose an experience of truth that is not necessarily based on rational arguments and reasons, “It does not require a reason to be.” However, in Heidegger being and entity are deeply intertwined while in Eckhart God does not need to be recognized by man as he is the cause of itself, independent of man. El artículo pretende identificar algunos de los puntos de confluencia entre el pensamiento de Eckhart y el de Heidegger y, a su vez, algunos puntos de influencia del primer autor en el segundo. Castañeda compara el abordaje que ambos filósofos hacen de ideas como el darse de Dios y del ser, el desprendimiento y la libertad.Para ambos autores tanto Dios como el ser son realidades inexpresables e innombrables. No obstante es necesario pensar el ser y encontrar a Dios pero pensar el ser es pensar a su vez en la nada. En Eckhart y Heidegger el darse de Dios o del ser implica asumir una actitud de desprendimiento y serenidad para dejar salir lo oculto, renunciar por completo a toda voluntad, despojarse del pensar representativo y de todo cálculo. Al respecto, los dos autores proponen una experiencia de verdad que no se basa necesariamente en fundamentaciones racionales y causales, “no se requiere un porqué para poder ser”. Sin embargo, para Heidegger ser y ente están profundamente imbricados mientras para Eckhart Dios no necesita ser reconocido por el hombre ya que él es causa de sí mismo, independientemente del hombre. |
| URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/10656/9259 |
| Other Identifiers: | https://revistas.uniminuto.edu/index.php/POLI/article/view/199 10.26620/uniminuto.polisemia.5.7.2009.61-72 |
| Appears in Collections: | Polisemia |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.