File(s) not publicly available
The ‘Go's and the ‘No-Go's of response-inhibition training to food: lessons learned from trials
journal contribution
posted on 2023-02-15, 03:06 authored by NS Lawrence, L Porter, Petra StaigerPetra StaigerHigh food-reward sensitivity and low inhibitory control are modifiable targets for overeating interventions. Our review of 16 food-related response-inhibition training (RIT) trials identified key elements linked to effectiveness, including recruiting from at-risk populations (i.e. those with overweight or heightened snacking behaviour), and designing intervention tasks to support bottom-up, associative (food-inhibition) learning. The optimal comparison condition depends on the research question, but the most consistent training effects have been seen relative to generalised (non-food) RIT. Trial outcomes should prioritise objective and validated measures (e.g. weight loss and explicit food devaluation). Future trials should consider unanswered questions such as training schedules and timing, and whether training people to ‘go’ to healthy foods can increase their appeal.
History
Journal
Current Opinion in Behavioral SciencesVolume
48Article number
101229Publisher DOI
ISSN
2352-1546eISSN
2352-1546Language
EnglishPublisher
ELSEVIERUsage metrics
Keywords
Science & TechnologySocial SciencesLife Sciences & BiomedicineBehavioral SciencesNeurosciencesPsychology, ExperimentalNeurosciences & NeurologyPsychologyRANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALEATING BEHAVIORWEIGHT-LOSSGO/NO-GOMECHANISMSATTENTIONOBESITYCONSUMPTIONNutritionClinical ResearchBehavioral and Social SciencePreventionObesityClinical Trials and Supportive ActivitiesCardiovascular2 Zero HungerPsychology not elsewhere classified
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC